Shocking behaviour towards lesbians at Leeds 'pride' today

[MrsSnippyPants]

twitter.com/LilyLilyMaynard/status/1158020993006411779?s=20

I'm not on Twitter, so no I can't. Someone showed it to me. If you're on Twitter, go and have a look.

I have just looked up the logo that was on the T-shirt, and yes, it's a paedophilic symbol, according to the FBI.

I couldn't care less if you're pretending to not get it early. There are zillions of threads on here and any feminist site showing the infiltration of paedophilia using transgenderism as a Trojan horse.

Your faux scepticism is counter productive.

Keep going.

Go back to page 5 dick there were many posts on MAPs.

The only reason I asked for evidence recently as other little lies were exposed so wanted clarity on earlier ones.

Posters here seem to question everything TRAs/trans people say or do, but never what GC say/do. It makes for strange dynamics of people believing they are seeing truths no one else sees, when actually some of those truths are based on as much fiction as the ones they’re angry about.

Interesting stuff from a psychological perspective.

I, for one, would never want to conclude that some paedophiles have not associated themselves with Pride parades, especially when these parades are deliberately promoted as a "family-friendly" events. It would be a lowering of the child safeguarding boundary to do so.

Datun I’m not on twitter either but I’ve searched with no luck.

However if this is so blatantly exposed everywhere, whys no one been able to show it?

And what have MAPs got to do with transgenderism? They are not trying to do it under self ID, they’re open pedophiles?

I couldn't care less if you're pretending to not get it early

Nobody's pretending not to get anything at all (I'm not anyway, can't speak for others.
You do it lots - throw things out as fact then when people question it (I asked once to see your stats on another thread) you went no, shan't.
Now it's happening here as well - turns out they didn't have their own float at Leeds then as said, no evidence to say they were there at all but you seemed to want people to just straight away think they were.
Do you think people will just swallow everything you say as blind fact?
Maybe some do, but others will question.

However if this is so blatantly exposed everywhere, whys no one been able to show it?

"Except of course, us talking relentlessly about maps, nomaps Yaniv, Bradley and their incest rape, Fae and campaign to lower the age of extreme porn participants, the other Faye saying suck dick, get tits early, drag queen storytime, Desmond is amazing, Lactatia, the sweets and puppies at pride, promoted by mermaids, the furries, bronys, nappy fetishists and incarcerated rapers of children."

Don't you think you should investigate? If pedophiles are trying to infiltrate - and there seems to be a lot of evidence that they are, why would we NOT want to look into this?
Why would you want to cover it up?

How, oh how, can anyone keep saying there is no evidence?

it (I asked once to see your stats on another thread) you went no, shan't.

Lol. That was awesome. You spent the next 500 tweets outraged I wouldn't do your homework.

I have 1000 posts per page but I did go back.

Someone posted that they'd seen something on twitter, then a few posts later someone posted literally saying "where is the evidence"?

What I don't understand is why you're saying that people just blindly believed it without questioning it when a) it was questioned within a few posts and b) one of those few posts not questioning was by you.

We like evidence here. We ask for it a lot. We ask lots of questions.

How, oh how, can anyone keep saying there is no evidence?

OK, where's the evidence they were at Leeds like said?
Maybe I missed it?
Or if there's not any evidence for Leeds, any in the UK at all?

turns out they didn't have their own float at Leeds then as said, no evidence to say they were there at all but you seemed to want people to just straight away think they were.

How do we know that some or even all the men on that float were not paedophiles? We are coming to conclusions either way, aren't we?

We are told it was the "fetish" float because of how some of the men were attired [presumably in BDSM gear, furry costumes, and / or gimp suits]. Whatever it was, fetishes are paraphilic behaviours as is paedophilia.

Don’t deflect datun we’re talking about MAPs at Leeds. I know you’re trying to get emotions out so people forget the question but manipulation doesn’t work on me. Some of those things mentioned are awful, different discussion though.

this is how this whole thing sounds to me -

‘You’re being lied too everyone, come and live truth with me! And I too, will lie to you, but by then, you will be so convinced im right that you’ll never question my facts anyway!’

History does have strange ways of repeating itself.

Oh - have we forgotten to mention Aimee Challoner's fiance and his pedo and incest fantasies?

Lol. That was awesome. You spent the next 500 tweets outraged I wouldn't do your homework

Erm.... no, just was utterly bonkers (and still is!) that you can never back anything up, just expect people to blindly slurp up what you're saying.

I think this is a really intelligent and relevant post, worth repeating:

Arguing over whether the paedophiles had their own float, coat-tailed the fetish float, or just found each other and walked as a group, does not detract from the fact that paedophiles have been openly attending Prides across the UK/world and sharing about it on social media.

If I tell my neighbour a burglar is climbing through the window she left open I don't expect her to have a go because she thinks I'm criticising her need for fresh air.

Noticing safeguarding fails shouldn't be seen as criticism. If there was even a hint of suspicion that paedoohiles were exploiting 'my movement' I'd want to know about it and do something about it.

Thank you Spartacus.

Surely, we all agree there's enough evidence on twitter and other social media to prove that paedophiles are infiltrating pride (Peter Twatchell @ Brighton Pride etc)? So what if some people on here got some of their 'facts' wrong? Their general concerns and points still hold true and it seems we ALL agree with these concerns. Absolutely no good will come from this obsessive point scoring over the details. It's divisive and at this time, more than ever, we need to be united.

Accidental misgendering - not sure of 'gender' said fiance:
Oh - have we forgotten to mention Aimee Challoner's fiance and their pedo and incest fantasies?

You’re being lied too everyone, come and live truth with me! And I too, will lie to you, but by then, you will be so convinced im right that you’ll never question my facts anyway!’ History does have strange ways of repeating itself

Eek.
Good point

Don’t deflect datun we’re talking about MAPs at Leeds. I know you’re trying to get emotions out so people forget the question but manipulation doesn’t work on me. Some of those things mentioned are awful, different discussion though

All of this

You know - this thread has been really useful. I'd not really put it all together in my head before - but the evidence piling up is overwhelming.

Early - the point here surely is that displaying one's fetish is now more acceptable at Pride than being a same sex-attracted women. I've lost track but this fact seems to be indisputable and this, for me, is the bonkers thing.

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Pride supposed to be a celebration of same sex attraction?

does not detract from the fact that paedophiles have been openly attending Prides across the UK/world and sharing about it on social media

OK, fair enough, so if it's all out there in the UK, why does there seem to be no evidence? You'd think somebody somewhere could give an example

‘You’re being lied too everyone, come and live truth with me! And I too, will lie to you, but by then, you will be so convinced im right that you’ll never question my facts anyway!’

Given that the entire transgender ideology is a lie and its advocates can't seem to understand this, I'd rather not listen to any trans advocates or their allies tell me what is a lie and what is not, thanks.

Seems that Roses and Early are still just picking over which window was left open while the house is being ransacked.

Sorry all - the “maps at Pride” video I saw was date stamped 21 July, so could not have been Leeds Pride. I incorrectly assumed it was (it was on T today) and was wrong to mention here without verifying.

On the bright side, someone tweeted the footage to Stonewall asking them to condemn it, so maybe they will issue a statement “maps have no place at Pride” or similar.

Also, an official trans org said it was over 120 marchers who surrounded the lesbians chanting “no terfs at Pride.” This video shows it better.