Shocking behaviour towards lesbians at Leeds 'pride' today

[MrsSnippyPants]

twitter.com/LilyLilyMaynard/status/1158020993006411779?s=20

Are you not even a little bit concerned?
Cos I'm getting concerned about you.

@Earlywalker I cant even see the float in that picture.

The summary said float with weird flags.

But as I said

What do you call someone who gets kicks out of involving the general public, without their consent, in their sexual games?

What do you call someone who gets sexual kicks of display the fetish play infront of children?

Can you explain why you feel a fetish float has a place at pride?

Early no I’m pretty sure I was the first. And those that followed (including you) were responding to what I said.

The video of a man singing “I’d rather be a pervert than a trf” was* at Leeds, which may have confused the issue.

Are any of those people open and proud pedophiles that are accepted by the LGBT community as pedophiles?

PETER TATCHELL

Well, there were fetishists who were encouraging very small children into their tent to play with toys while they also sported erections in Lancaster, lesbians were physically assaulted at Leeds and Lancaster. but I'm sure there's no creep at all for paedophiles (whatever they call themselves, they're still paedophiles) into LGBT spaces. The ones at Lancaster have been supported and any protest against it vilified by local LGBTQIA+ groups, but again, I'm sure that doesn't mean that they're accepted, it's just an aberration.

Nothing to see, silly mummies overreacting again. Just not woke and cool enough.

It's such a shame Early and her friends weren't in Lancaster, because I'm super sure they'd have been all over telling those men off rather than clapping the display of VAWG about 20 yards away

Cowbag bitches?
Ah yes, I remember that thread - where it seems fine to use completely mysogynistic language and behaviour towards other women if you're so called GC.

Early and Roses I can understand why the vast majority of people on here and IRL would be concerned with the pedophiles infiltrating pride - Peter Twatchell's leading of Brighton pride, being one example - but I'm becoming increasingly suspicious of your ongoing desperate attempt to deny this is happening.

Why is your motivation behind trying to silence people who are trying to raise awareness about pedophiles presence at pride events and in the LGBT movement generally?

Come to think of it - jess Bradley - of the pedo and incest fantasies and flashing - what has happened? Has he been hung out to dry by the rest of the LBGT - or has it all been covered up?
What about the NSPCC guy wanking in toilets at work?

I'm not trying to silence anyone - it's always the same, when asked to back up you get pages of arguments of no shan't.
If there is evidence out there of in the UK then fair enough that's awful but why not just say and link to it in the first place? I's not asking to do homework or whatever, it's just the constant saying as fact from some that's a problem too.
It'd save all this pages of crap where you get into arguments for asking a bloody question lol

Definitely two before you 2be it was bytheway and floralbunting that I saw.

But yes your comment about no one objecting to the pedos but instead objecting to lesbians is what I responded too.

Why is your motivation behind trying to silence people who are trying to raise awareness about pedophiles presence at pride events and in the LGBT movement generally?

This is not my issue, I have said time and time again that we need to safeguard and keep pedophiles away from pride and ensure they are never accepted as a part of LGBT.

My issue is with people lying and saying that pedophiles are already accepted by the LGBT and pride community with no evidence for this.

wish do you really think I’d post a fake picture on here when there’s dozens of posters ready to pounce on me I assure you it is the float.

Interesting innit? The critics here on this thread utterly failed this morning to refute the aggressive confrontation by the "trans" ideology advocates in Leeds towards a small group of lesbians, so they have gone hell for leather [pardon me] for the paedophilia and fetish [paraphilias] angle as a major deflection.

Bless 'em!

Personally, I want to return to why these critics here failed to acknowledge that the ideology advocates could have made a different choice about how they behaved towards that small group of women and why they were so aggressive.

We don't know if pride accept paedophiles, because they're keeping very quiet about it. So the paedophiles just carry on. Even though everyone is talking about it, it's on Twitter, on here, and on every feminist site. Pride still don't appear to have said anything.

I'm going to take that as acceptance.

Stonewall do tho. They never tire of telling us. Acceptance without exception.

no aim other than to dominate the thread and a lot of protesting about how rotten and horrible MNetters are and how disgusting and pointless these conversations are (while continuing to post and post and post here, often investing hours and hours of their time into it, go figure),

Translogic.

This is not my issue, I have said time and time again that we need to safeguard and keep pedophiles away from pride and ensure they are never accepted as a part of LGBT. My issue is with people lying and saying that pedophiles are already accepted by the LGBT and pride community with no evidence for this

Exactly same stance here

But they are accepted. We've just shown this.
Don't matter how many times you deny it.
Everyone can see it.

so they have gone hell for leather [pardon me] for the paedophilia and fetish [paraphilias] angle as a major deflection

We're not the ones who brought up MAPS though
Other poster did saying they were accepted at Pride
Me and a couple of others questioned that saying where are they accepted at Pride, and do they have their own float?
As it was said they did.
Were we just supposed to swallow it as truth?

Interesting innit? The critics here on this thread utterly failed this morning to refute the aggressive confrontation by the "trans" ideology advocates in Leeds towards a small group of lesbians, so they have gone hell for leather [pardon me] for the paedophilia and fetish [paraphilias] angle as a major deflection.

No, no. They've gone for the exact geographical location of the paedophilia and fetish, as their deflection.

And by deflection I mean illuminating their motives to everyone who reads the thread.

🤣

Roses - why aren't you concerned about the amount of evidence there is?

Sorry to be a pain, if anyone is on a computer and has time, would you mind possibly linking this video from this site?

The video in the OP is just a glimpse - this one shows 120+ people all yelling - it made my blood run cold. It could have turned really bad.

I did see a man in a dog mask and fetish gear chatting to (and filming - not sure?) young girls. Didn’t seem quite right - don’t people get turned on in their fetish gear - it’s part of their sexuality?

Cowbag bitches?
Ah yes, I remember that thread - where it seems fine to use completely mysogynistic language and behaviour towards other women if you're so called GC.

You forgot handmaidens, lacking, woke, stupid, dumb, brainless, c*nts, naïve, idiots and all the other insults that are thrown at women who happen to have a different opinion by people on here and some of their allies.

Really hope there's still some logical/reasonable people out there reading all this.
No motives, just you really don't like being questioned do you?
Comes across as "I speak truth, take it as fact, all follow me...."
Some will ask you a question if you come out with MAP have their own float at Pride.
Not just blindly believe you.

Another deflection. One would think they had something to hide.

The video in the OP is just a glimpse - this one shows 120+ people all yelling - it made my blood run cold. It could have turned really bad.

Hence warning the police first presumably.

I can't link at the moment. I'm not sure I want to watch it, either. Baying men bullying women is the hallmark of this movement.

If there is evidence out there of in the UK then fair enough that's awful but why not just say and link to it in the first place?

An absence of evidence does not equate with evidence of absence.

What is the probability that paedophiles are associating themselves with some aspects of the GBT community and participating in Pride parades? [And probably against the consent of most of the GBT community.]