Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 39! The Uganda divide…diplomatic necessity vs needless pandering.

501 replies

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 18:34

Continuing the discussion, still interested, still not bored!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
OctarineGrass · Today 20:32

I could be wrong but having seen this play out in person, I believe this round is 'the show of force'. The lies, the tantrums, the sulks, the pretend amazing life etc have not gotten them what they want from the RF.

Since they returned to the UK it's clear they are just going to be royal (their version of royal) because dammit they are royal and no one is going to stop them. Every move from here on will be directed at showing the RF that they cannot be dismissed and they will be the most important members of the RF.

They are going to force it to happen by refusing to follow any of the rules laid out for them, and by continually pushing their narrative by showing up and doing things they are not suppose to be doing (all while shitting all over KC/W&C). It is going to be the worst shit show yet.

H wants W's role and M wants C's, and their DC are to replace W&C's DC (without the actual work). If they don't get it, M for sure will be happy to see the RF sink with H following her lead. It's going to get messy and costly very soon.

I don't think the school change is about them being dim about how things work, this is about them making a huge issue about everything good or bad - death by a thousand cuts for the RF.

calfolly · Today 20:37

OctarineGrass · Today 20:32

I could be wrong but having seen this play out in person, I believe this round is 'the show of force'. The lies, the tantrums, the sulks, the pretend amazing life etc have not gotten them what they want from the RF.

Since they returned to the UK it's clear they are just going to be royal (their version of royal) because dammit they are royal and no one is going to stop them. Every move from here on will be directed at showing the RF that they cannot be dismissed and they will be the most important members of the RF.

They are going to force it to happen by refusing to follow any of the rules laid out for them, and by continually pushing their narrative by showing up and doing things they are not suppose to be doing (all while shitting all over KC/W&C). It is going to be the worst shit show yet.

H wants W's role and M wants C's, and their DC are to replace W&C's DC (without the actual work). If they don't get it, M for sure will be happy to see the RF sink with H following her lead. It's going to get messy and costly very soon.

I don't think the school change is about them being dim about how things work, this is about them making a huge issue about everything good or bad - death by a thousand cuts for the RF.

😬I know a person with this exact MO. Scorched earth policy.

smilesy · Today 20:37

OctarineGrass · Today 20:32

I could be wrong but having seen this play out in person, I believe this round is 'the show of force'. The lies, the tantrums, the sulks, the pretend amazing life etc have not gotten them what they want from the RF.

Since they returned to the UK it's clear they are just going to be royal (their version of royal) because dammit they are royal and no one is going to stop them. Every move from here on will be directed at showing the RF that they cannot be dismissed and they will be the most important members of the RF.

They are going to force it to happen by refusing to follow any of the rules laid out for them, and by continually pushing their narrative by showing up and doing things they are not suppose to be doing (all while shitting all over KC/W&C). It is going to be the worst shit show yet.

H wants W's role and M wants C's, and their DC are to replace W&C's DC (without the actual work). If they don't get it, M for sure will be happy to see the RF sink with H following her lead. It's going to get messy and costly very soon.

I don't think the school change is about them being dim about how things work, this is about them making a huge issue about everything good or bad - death by a thousand cuts for the RF.

Nah. They don’t think that hard and they really are not that important. And I’m pretty sure if they became a real nuisance, something will be done to clip their wings

GroundCloves · Today 20:40

VintageWithVerve · Today 16:58

Does the same law apply to using them on private land? I know it’s different for driving cars on private land.

Yes it does. I checked that specifically. And leisure use. Passengers on quads built for one (with a long seat you sit astride) are always illegal. Under 13 can only use specific lower powered quads if the quad and wider set up comply with legislation. I guess it is in response to the 4 to 16 people killed using them each year, principally on private farm land.

RastaMouse99 · Today 20:40

Rentfreeinyourhead · Today 20:18

According to X, the convoy split up in the school car park and other parents’s cars slipped inbetween. The audacity. You can literally hear the swearing behind the steering wheels of the parents caught in the mayhem of massive 4x4s who don’t know what the doing and are breaking the carefully constructed system that is drop off.

If it's the Dragon, most people doing the drop off are the parents, often mothers. It's an amazing school so you know the horror of the commute is worth it.
I don't think it could ever be worth it for a non-relative, no matter their fee.
I'm not surprised the security team made up some bullshit excuse when faced with doing that commute every day for the next 5+ years.
The security team are private, so will never say to HaM, "nah, you can just drive them yourselves, safe as houses." It would be like Michael Jackson and his medical team. Never given a clean bill of health.

Mylovelygreendress · Today 20:41

I still don’t understand the convoy .
Assuming both parents were in the huge 4x4 ( unlikely if feedback from Monteshitshow is accurate) there would still be room for a security guy in the vehicle so why a convoy ?

PrivateCapacityFanny · Today 20:49

Mylovelygreendress · Today 20:41

I still don’t understand the convoy .
Assuming both parents were in the huge 4x4 ( unlikely if feedback from Monteshitshow is accurate) there would still be room for a security guy in the vehicle so why a convoy ?

With the best will in the world there is no understanding it except as either security theatre to provoke free public protection or a manifestation of some kind of delusion.

GroundCloves · Today 20:50

SanguineAutumnalCrow · Today 19:29

The chief security bod is now Harry's close friend, apparently. Travelled over with them from Montecito. Drove them away from Birmingham airport.

He should have asked Meg about roundabouts. She's stood on one or two in her time. Geneva, was it?

I wonder if the feeling is reciprocal

CathyorClaire · Today 21:04

I still don’t understand the convoy .

Considering it as theatre might work?

IMO it's on a par with the 'near catastrophic' car chase 🎭

calfolly · Today 21:07

Of course it's theatre otherwise why publicise a potential security risk.

Scorchio84 · Today 21:11

Harry can't get his head around that he is now Beatrice!

This has really made me snigger, thanks @Lunde 😆

Lunde · Today 21:20

Mylovelygreendress · Today 20:41

I still don’t understand the convoy .
Assuming both parents were in the huge 4x4 ( unlikely if feedback from Monteshitshow is accurate) there would still be room for a security guy in the vehicle so why a convoy ?

Yeah - I don't understand the whole convoy thing. Surely an SUV or people carrier with blacked out windows would have space for kids, a parent/nanny and one or two bodyguards?

I think this security team must be padding their bills by convincing gullible HAM that they need US Presidential style motorcades on the school run.

Thedom · Today 21:21

Rentfreeinyourhead · Today 20:18

According to X, the convoy split up in the school car park and other parents’s cars slipped inbetween. The audacity. You can literally hear the swearing behind the steering wheels of the parents caught in the mayhem of massive 4x4s who don’t know what the doing and are breaking the carefully constructed system that is drop off.

Google brings up,this info…… I wonder were their demands just too much for the school to implement.

The rules—communicated directly to other parents through official notices—focused heavily on containing information within the school gates:

  • Strict Ban on Devices: Parents and visitors were prohibited from using smartphones or cameras anywhere near the playground, pick-up zones, or drop-off areas to prevent accidental or intentional photos of the Sussex children. 1]
  • Social Media Gag Order: A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life, playground interactions, or student names on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook. 1]
  • Playground Vetting: Reports suggested that security personnel reviewed the physical layout of the outdoor play spaces to ensure visibility was limited from surrounding public vantage points, creating strict spatial boundaries for where children could safely congregate.
The restrictions created an underlying tension among the student body's families, who felt the blanket rules altered the normal, relaxed community environment of the school.

Ultimately, the policy was short-lived. On the advice of their private protection team, the Duke and Duchess pulled their children from the school after just two days, citing that gridlocked school-run traffic was a logistical and safety risk for their security detail.

AlexandraCarrington · Today 21:30

A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life....

So you couldn't even mention the Harvest Festival, or say that your child was going to be a sheep in the Nativity? Bet that went down well with parents. And how could anyone enforce it?

Usernameinabeyance · Today 21:32

Thedom · Today 21:21

Google brings up,this info…… I wonder were their demands just too much for the school to implement.

The rules—communicated directly to other parents through official notices—focused heavily on containing information within the school gates:

  • Strict Ban on Devices: Parents and visitors were prohibited from using smartphones or cameras anywhere near the playground, pick-up zones, or drop-off areas to prevent accidental or intentional photos of the Sussex children. 1]
  • Social Media Gag Order: A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life, playground interactions, or student names on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook. 1]
  • Playground Vetting: Reports suggested that security personnel reviewed the physical layout of the outdoor play spaces to ensure visibility was limited from surrounding public vantage points, creating strict spatial boundaries for where children could safely congregate.
The restrictions created an underlying tension among the student body's families, who felt the blanket rules altered the normal, relaxed community environment of the school.

Ultimately, the policy was short-lived. On the advice of their private protection team, the Duke and Duchess pulled their children from the school after just two days, citing that gridlocked school-run traffic was a logistical and safety risk for their security detail.

Their private protection team= actually just a bloke called Steve going "nah mate I ain't doing that again what a waste of me time"

SanguineAutumnalCrow · Today 21:35

AlexandraCarrington · Today 21:30

A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life....

So you couldn't even mention the Harvest Festival, or say that your child was going to be a sheep in the Nativity? Bet that went down well with parents. And how could anyone enforce it?

I simply don’t believe it. A headteacher would have to be mad to go along with such nonsense, in the state or private sector. Some proper mental narratives are being pedalled now by the Sussex Two and their wealthier-by-the-minute bestie Mr Securidee Chief.

SanguineAutumnalCrow · Today 21:41

Apparently Harry’s Chief of Besties is actually an experienced professional called David Langdown. The mind boggles as to what an inexperienced non-professional might have come up with re the school run fiasco.

Someone’s laughing all the way to the bank.

Rentfreeinyourhead · Today 21:42

There are quite a few influencers with legitimate, successful businesses who are parents at Dragon. I know this because I follow them on social media and they post about sports day etc and tag each other. They are titled and stately home posh too. There is no way they will be told not to post about their own lives thank you very much.

Mylovelygreendress · Today 21:42

Thedom · Today 21:21

Google brings up,this info…… I wonder were their demands just too much for the school to implement.

The rules—communicated directly to other parents through official notices—focused heavily on containing information within the school gates:

  • Strict Ban on Devices: Parents and visitors were prohibited from using smartphones or cameras anywhere near the playground, pick-up zones, or drop-off areas to prevent accidental or intentional photos of the Sussex children. 1]
  • Social Media Gag Order: A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life, playground interactions, or student names on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook. 1]
  • Playground Vetting: Reports suggested that security personnel reviewed the physical layout of the outdoor play spaces to ensure visibility was limited from surrounding public vantage points, creating strict spatial boundaries for where children could safely congregate.
The restrictions created an underlying tension among the student body's families, who felt the blanket rules altered the normal, relaxed community environment of the school.

Ultimately, the policy was short-lived. On the advice of their private protection team, the Duke and Duchess pulled their children from the school after just two days, citing that gridlocked school-run traffic was a logistical and safety risk for their security detail.

I simply cannot imagine W and C behaving like that .

bluegreygreen · Today 21:44

SanguineAutumnalCrow · Today 21:27

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/meghan-markle-harry-uk-pictures-b3049849.html

From the Independent ^^.

I’ll see if I can archive it, but I have a horrible eye infection so keep hitting the wrong buttons.

Here: https://archive.ph/Wqqwm

Edited

Archive link https://archive.is/Wqqwm

Sorry, missed your edit!

Hope you feel better soon.

Thedom · Today 21:46

Mylovelygreendress · Today 21:42

I simply cannot imagine W and C behaving like that .

I don’t think they have done, when you google it it says there is an ‘expectation of mutual respect amongst the parents with regards to students,privacy’. the only privilege is being allowed to drive directly into the premises for security reasons. Catherine and William are very involved in the school apparently.

No drama at any of the schools their kids have attended.

PullTheBricksDown · Today 21:51

A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life, playground interactions, or student names on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook

..or what?

Honestly? No crime's been committed. The other parents will all also be paying the fees, so who does the school want to annoy, one set of fee payers, or all the others?

BasiliskStare · Today 21:54

I'm with @SanguineAutumnalCrow on those directives - just don't believe it. & If had been me now rather than 25 years ago , if Steve or Dave had asked me to put down my phone when I was trying to wrestle DS's book bag , sports bag and a rocket made out of a kitchen roll tube as a fun start of term project into the back of my small hatch back, whilst trying to listen on silent to a work conference call I might have told him where he could shove his convoy.

If only they had not fallen out with Trump they could have asked him whether they could buy the Beast when he gets a new one 😊

bluegreygreen · Today 21:55

Thedom · Today 21:21

Google brings up,this info…… I wonder were their demands just too much for the school to implement.

The rules—communicated directly to other parents through official notices—focused heavily on containing information within the school gates:

  • Strict Ban on Devices: Parents and visitors were prohibited from using smartphones or cameras anywhere near the playground, pick-up zones, or drop-off areas to prevent accidental or intentional photos of the Sussex children. 1]
  • Social Media Gag Order: A strict directive was issued forbidding families from posting any details, anecdotes, or descriptions of school life, playground interactions, or student names on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook. 1]
  • Playground Vetting: Reports suggested that security personnel reviewed the physical layout of the outdoor play spaces to ensure visibility was limited from surrounding public vantage points, creating strict spatial boundaries for where children could safely congregate.
The restrictions created an underlying tension among the student body's families, who felt the blanket rules altered the normal, relaxed community environment of the school.

Ultimately, the policy was short-lived. On the advice of their private protection team, the Duke and Duchess pulled their children from the school after just two days, citing that gridlocked school-run traffic was a logistical and safety risk for their security detail.

Not sure how reliable Google AI is being - the link takes you to a Facebook discussion about a restaurant having strict rules for children.

Swipe left for the next trending thread