Please or to access all these features

The royal family

King Charles orders Harry & Meghan to be treated like ordinary citizens 2

378 replies

Viviennemary · 08/09/2026 20:24

Is there any more to be said. I expect there probably is. So I started a new thread. Be interesting to see what their next move is. It's like a game of chess A we getting clarification. I want to know if they'll be doing walkabouts, hospital visits, and so on. Being greeted by dignitaries at home and overseas like they were on their visit to NY and Australia.

OP posts:
Notsosweetcaroline · 09/09/2026 13:44

WhiteFramesandPlanes · 09/09/2026 11:33

I can only imagine she is giving him custody of the kids but is waiting for them to get settled before she sets herself free. I can't think of any other reason

As much as they may split I really don’t think this is what this is about.

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 13:45

U53rName · 09/09/2026 11:25

Really? AFAIK, Invictus Games is still going strong and making an impact?

Invictus is great, or it was.

But you must be aware that its future is threatened by funding shortfalls, controversies and maybe even scandals.

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 13:46

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 13:42

I can't get my head round their return unless it was somehow forced on them. Harry, yes - the silly, eternal teenage Hooray Henry that he is. But Meghan? That totally surprised me. It's well-known she's no fan of the UK.

The speed of their return is curious. There are many possibilities - visa issues, a tax advantage in living outside the USA, concerns about Trump and his dislike for meghan in particular, resident in the UK requirements for the children.

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 13:47

namechangeduetoimpatience · 09/09/2026 13:36

Don't you know Meghan is the devil? There is a very specific demographic that her mere existence seems to irritate.

I think you'll find that Harry gets a ton of criticism on here as well as Meghan. In fact, over the last few days, I've seen a lot of posts tending to blame him for the mess more than her.

MargaretThursday · 09/09/2026 13:47

CurlewKate · 09/09/2026 10:01

Well, so far, we’ve had the King formally clarifying, for those that need clarification, H&M’s position. Nothing people didn’t know already.

It's obvious to most people, so shouldn't need clarification.
However to H & M it obviously is a complicated narrative or they wouldn't have complained they should have had it sooner.

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 13:50

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 13:45

Invictus is great, or it was.

But you must be aware that its future is threatened by funding shortfalls, controversies and maybe even scandals.

Uganda, which signed up in July this year, has just dropped out, the head of the defence staff and son of the president citing 'Harry and Meghan nonsense'. He also avowed loyalty to KCIII, which suggests the communication earlier this week is behind it. It's unlikely that other Commonwealth countries will follow suit(s).

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 13:50

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 13:46

The speed of their return is curious. There are many possibilities - visa issues, a tax advantage in living outside the USA, concerns about Trump and his dislike for meghan in particular, resident in the UK requirements for the children.

It's intriging.

We've had one or two of the predictable, time-travelling posts asking 'why do we care?' and 'are you still talking about them?' haven't we, but it's obvious to most people that there've been not one, but 2 sensational events in the last week. The utterly surprising return of a couple who left, rubbishing the UK, its RF and its press etc, and now the King has come out an publicly slapped their wrists too!

I make no apology for being fascinated by these developments and I'm mystified as to what's really going on!

Dontevenlookatme · 09/09/2026 13:51

I wont mention the racial undertones in half of these comments but God helps us.

You just did, @namechangeduetoimpatience so do clarify.

Notsosweetcaroline · 09/09/2026 13:54

MargaretThursday · 09/09/2026 13:47

It's obvious to most people, so shouldn't need clarification.
However to H & M it obviously is a complicated narrative or they wouldn't have complained they should have had it sooner.

yes, and Harry and Megan’s spokesperson said some points need clarifying, I can’t imagine what they are, and it is just a restatement of what they agreed and wished for, but for Harry and Megan apparently they no longer wish to be private citizens, but public figures and some points did need clarifying.

damnatiomemoriae · 09/09/2026 13:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please point out the racial undertones.

As a woman wrapped in fabulous brown skin I missed it.

I usually spot it a mile off.

The only things of bleakness I can see is that people are seeing things that aren’t there and are reading things that aren’t posted.

Keep your vile and frothing to yourself unless you can quote who is vile and who is frothing.

God and Jesus Christ are waiting.

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 09/09/2026 14:01

damnatiomemoriae · 09/09/2026 13:58

Please point out the racial undertones.

As a woman wrapped in fabulous brown skin I missed it.

I usually spot it a mile off.

The only things of bleakness I can see is that people are seeing things that aren’t there and are reading things that aren’t posted.

Keep your vile and frothing to yourself unless you can quote who is vile and who is frothing.

God and Jesus Christ are waiting.

Edited

❤️

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 14:04

Notsosweetcaroline · 09/09/2026 13:54

yes, and Harry and Megan’s spokesperson said some points need clarifying, I can’t imagine what they are, and it is just a restatement of what they agreed and wished for, but for Harry and Megan apparently they no longer wish to be private citizens, but public figures and some points did need clarifying.

HAM's expectation that they could have editing rights over a communication directly from the monarch shows how deluded they are. The announcement reiterates the agreement made at the Sandringham summit, and adds points that place them outside the sphere of royal duties and public funding for anything they do. It's the second that they would have wanted to comment on because they want to be public figures.

Harry is too dim not to have understood that two mortals cannot triumph over a 1,000 year-old institution. Meghan has insufficient understanding of how things are done in the UK to pull the required strings to influence it. Both of them are too self-obsessed and immature to behave in ways which would invite co-operation.

When they left the UK for Canada, their announcement about carving out a progressive new role in the Royal family was written by them, with no output from the Royal Household, and they gave the Queen 20 minutes notice that it was going yo be issued.

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 14:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Quite the leap - royal-adjacent tittle-tattle on a web forum to the dissing of a nation. Your diagnosis of 'the problem with this country' is quite different to our new PM. He blames 40 years of neo-liberalism.

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 14:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I haven't noticed a single bubble of froth on this thread - except for yours!

And I think all the nasty accusations against pps here are unjustified. No-one's wishing for them to divorce - please quote the thread where someone wishes divorce on them. i certainly don't - although I admit my concern in all of their shenanigans is for their young children and not for the self-sabotaging pair, HaM.

It's so ridiculous - to be scolded for 'frothing' by someone who is clearly about to blow their gasket! 😂

Lampzade · 09/09/2026 14:34

Notsosweetcaroline · 09/09/2026 13:42

Every communication that comes out of the palace is an absolute and utter masterclass in how it’s done. This one slapped them firmly into place, reminded them of what they wished, and showed the royal family as totally in the power postion. The palace will say no more on the subject. It’s done. Harry can kick off all he wants, there will be nothing else said.

Harry and Megan will abhor the fact they’ve been called private citizens. It will go against everything Megan’s ambition is driving for. And put Harry in the position of he can’t help her achieve it.

If it was a masterclass the palace wouldn’t have to continue to clarify the Sussexes position

smilesy · 09/09/2026 14:39

Lampzade · 09/09/2026 14:34

If it was a masterclass the palace wouldn’t have to continue to clarify the Sussexes position

How to spectacularly miss the point 🙄

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 14:43

Lampzade · 09/09/2026 14:34

If it was a masterclass the palace wouldn’t have to continue to clarify the Sussexes position

My posts upthread argue for @Notsosweetcaroline's view. The statement issued by the Lord Chamberlain does a great deal more than reiterate the terms of the Sandringham agreement. It puts Harry and Meghan back in their place, asserts the power of the crown, and invites charities and governments to refer to Buckingham Palace in cases of doubt, including over the spending of public funds.

namechangeduetoimpatience · 09/09/2026 15:07

damnatiomemoriae · 09/09/2026 13:58

Please point out the racial undertones.

As a woman wrapped in fabulous brown skin I missed it.

I usually spot it a mile off.

The only things of bleakness I can see is that people are seeing things that aren’t there and are reading things that aren’t posted.

Keep your vile and frothing to yourself unless you can quote who is vile and who is frothing.

God and Jesus Christ are waiting.

Edited

You missing the undertones doesn’t make them disappear. And volunteering yourself as proof that they weren’t there is exactly the kind of cover bad faith comments thrive on. I said what I said.

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 15:11

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 14:43

My posts upthread argue for @Notsosweetcaroline's view. The statement issued by the Lord Chamberlain does a great deal more than reiterate the terms of the Sandringham agreement. It puts Harry and Meghan back in their place, asserts the power of the crown, and invites charities and governments to refer to Buckingham Palace in cases of doubt, including over the spending of public funds.

It was masterful.

And for anyone thinking it was brutal - it will have prevented a lot of potential disasters and misunderstandings. H & M might not like it but it needed to be said, before charities and other organisations found themselves in an embarrassing position.

Some of H's charities are indeed now feeling the effect of the HAM's messy involvement and it's not nice.

IdaGlossop · 09/09/2026 15:18

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 15:11

It was masterful.

And for anyone thinking it was brutal - it will have prevented a lot of potential disasters and misunderstandings. H & M might not like it but it needed to be said, before charities and other organisations found themselves in an embarrassing position.

Some of H's charities are indeed now feeling the effect of the HAM's messy involvement and it's not nice.

The Sentebale case is in the pipeline. Probably others will follow Uganda and withdraw from Invictus. RAVEC will rule on protection. Monday's communication will discourage charities from working with them. Doors are closing.

jeffgoldblum · 09/09/2026 15:21

namechangeduetoimpatience · 09/09/2026 15:07

You missing the undertones doesn’t make them disappear. And volunteering yourself as proof that they weren’t there is exactly the kind of cover bad faith comments thrive on. I said what I said.

Did you just reduce a poc posters comments to a cover? , bad faith ? , frankly I’m finding the only racial undertones on this thread are frankly coming from you!

CoffeeCantata · 09/09/2026 15:27

namechangeduetoimpatience · 09/09/2026 15:07

You missing the undertones doesn’t make them disappear. And volunteering yourself as proof that they weren’t there is exactly the kind of cover bad faith comments thrive on. I said what I said.

Point them out for us then.

Easy and cheap to make vague accusations (that’s actually what the Sussexes did in the OW interview) which throw shade on everyone.

Please be specific or withdraw your insulting accusation.

IAmATorturedPoet · 09/09/2026 15:28

jeffgoldblum · 09/09/2026 15:21

Did you just reduce a poc posters comments to a cover? , bad faith ? , frankly I’m finding the only racial undertones on this thread are frankly coming from you!

I agree.
I’m not sure how that poster can talk about racial undertones only to then follow up with that particularly comment. 🙄

jeffgoldblum · 09/09/2026 15:31

IAmATorturedPoet · 09/09/2026 15:28

I agree.
I’m not sure how that poster can talk about racial undertones only to then follow up with that particularly comment. 🙄

Agreed!

ProfessorofDarkArts · 09/09/2026 15:33

I cant see where race has been mentioned or even alluded to. A lot of people find Meghan increasingly hard to like but that has everything to do with her behaviour and manner. No doubt for some elsewhere it's her heritage because there are always idiots but I'm not seeing it here otherwise how do you explain the similar feeling towards Harry? They both do plenty to make themselves unpopular.

Swipe left for the next trending thread