Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 24

554 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 16:04

What more summer shenanigans await us from the Montecito duo?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
AnAutumnCrow · 15/07/2026 17:39

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 16:44

Maybe we should ask them to address Harry the PAPP, since they complain about us going over old ground from 5 years ago. Drugging young women at dinner parties is brand new information.

The only questions I ever want to hear Harry being asked in future by journalists and podcasters are: what was in the pill, Harry? Why did you put a pill in the mouth of a young woman?

Lifestooshort71 · 15/07/2026 17:41

jeffgoldblum · 15/07/2026 17:30

It is the real you isn’t it????😱

It is indeed!

BreadInCaptivity · 15/07/2026 17:45

Greetings All. Thanks for the new thread.

jeffgoldblum · 15/07/2026 17:45

Lifestooshort71 · 15/07/2026 17:41

It is indeed!

Phew! 😁

Lunde · 15/07/2026 17:46

So HAM PR are busy briefing their favourite mouthpiece - People Magazine - with an anti-William "exclusive" ... William is intransigent/Diana would be horrified rubbish
https://people.com/prince-harry-prince-william-no-contact-despite-king-charles-reunion-exclusive-12019296

They are soooo desperate for W&C to engage with them!

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 17:47

AnAutumnCrow · 15/07/2026 17:39

The only questions I ever want to hear Harry being asked in future by journalists and podcasters are: what was in the pill, Harry? Why did you put a pill in the mouth of a young woman?

If only. 🙏🏾

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 17:50

Lunde · 15/07/2026 17:46

So HAM PR are busy briefing their favourite mouthpiece - People Magazine - with an anti-William "exclusive" ... William is intransigent/Diana would be horrified rubbish
https://people.com/prince-harry-prince-william-no-contact-despite-king-charles-reunion-exclusive-12019296

They are soooo desperate for W&C to engage with them!

Just as I predicted. It was sign posted in Roya Nikka’s first out of the starting gate piece in the Times. William the intransigent bad guy while King Pa and Harry have a cosy love in.

SisterTeatime · 15/07/2026 17:53

Yes I think they were trolling a little bit, making the most of things they were already doing.

I also thought the visit to Hastings, on the day the ANL judgement happened, was interesting, given Harry’s nickname ‘Harold’. Although it tied in with the Bayeux Tapestry as well, of course, the contrast between the looks, demeanour and fortunes of the two brothers was quite striking.

I may be overinvested

Theunamedcat · 15/07/2026 17:54

Rhaidimiddim · 15/07/2026 17:20

Does anyone else think the P&poW were actively trolling HAM in the last few weeks? Time and again I was thinking - was that deliberate, RF subtlety.

The most famous ring in the world prominent in the Snowdon pic.

The three Wales princelings, full face, in a group photo with their grandparents and uncle. A very happy, close family. At a time when HAM are back-of-the-head only and KC3 is vetoing any pics of him with the HAMlets, if he ever lets them near him.

Catherine mixing with the public at a time when HAM were demanding heightened security.

Catherine at Wimbledon, again mixing with the public. And NOT having the seats around her emptied.

Catherine at Wimbledom again showing how a green cape dress should be worn.

Catherine and William disporting themselves graciously at a polo match, and the resulting photos.

Am I wrong? Did I miss anything?

Typos and two minor edits.

Edited

Maybe a little honestly i wouldn't blame them while harry was working himself into a frenzy about how unsafe it all was they were showing faith in the UK being safe

binkie163 · 15/07/2026 18:01

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 17:05

Todger! 😂

Yes the telling off from apparently brand new posters who confidently swan onto a long running series and try to police posters language 🙄

Tbh I pretty much skipped the last 4 pages of previous thread. As someone else said, not every thread is for everyone 🤷 do other threads get odd people determined to pick arguments, annoy and derail with little knowledge. If ham is so triggering I will revert to the twats.
For as long as I live I will never understand people, especially those that suffer with smugness and last wordism.

Cismyfatarse · 15/07/2026 18:02

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 16:44

Maybe we should ask them to address Harry the PAPP, since they complain about us going over old ground from 5 years ago. Drugging young women at dinner parties is brand new information.

Gives a whole new meaning to being papped. Love it!

BreadInCaptivity · 15/07/2026 18:19

Right….I saw we had some new joiners on the previous thread so I’m just going to set my stall out…

I was pleased when HAM started dating and more so when they announced their engagement.

I hoped they would be happy together and welcomed the diversity M brought to the RF through both her heritage, country of birth and career experience.

I would term myself a reluctant monarchist in the sense I am uncomfortable with the principle of power and huge wealth through birthright, but don’t value the alternative of an elected Head of State and can see how the Royal Allure brings benefits to the UK both financially and diplomatically.

I say this because I’m not “big” on royal traditions per se and some protocols rather silly and archaic.

As such I was happy to see M giving birth to A on her terms and doing away with the standing outside the hospital for a photocall. Likewise wearing whatever nail polish she liked and not wearing nude tights if she didn’t want to.

I didn’t care about the baby shower in NYC and for the record, yes I think some of the responses to her in MSM and especially SM had racist undertones and some overt racism.

I make this clear because some posters seem to want to create a narrative that posters all hate HAM and always have.

I don’t hate either of them. Why would I? I don’t know them personally nor do I the emotional energy to expand that level of response to a couple of celebrities.

So why am I here? Well I dip in and out. I can go months where HAM don’t cross my thoughts at all. But when they do, it’s because of something they have chosen to make public.

In the last 5 years it would have been nice (if only for a change of pace) to have something positive to respond to and if they did do something “good” (without the self severing undercurrent that’s pervasive presently) I’d be happy to acknowledge it.

The pair of them started to lose me was at the Bradbury interview in front of the orphanage. What about meeee…

Really? I mean really…..there’s a time and a place for self pity and not recognising that was not it.

But everyone deserves a second chance right?

So I stayed open minded until the HIHO manifesto.

Leaving the RF - fine. Good luck (well meant).

Leaving the RF while expecting to keep all perks and ditch the “service” - not fine.

Then from that point on it’s been one thing after another, Oprah, Spare, Interviews, documentaries all leveraging the platform provided by H’s birth status whist slagging off the institutions and country that provided it.

Their M.O. is now utterly predictable. Throw a poorly aimed grenade at the RF/UK govt/Courts and sob like toddlers when they inevitably get hit with the shrapnel of their own latest offensive.

I don’t judge them as people - but I do judge their actions and believe I have an absolute right to do so when their behaviours cost the British taxpayer money or their allegations represent a reputational smear on British institutions and culture.

If they decided to live privately or make a living that did not involve grifting of their titles I’d not give either of them another thought.

Rhaidimiddim · 15/07/2026 18:21

SisterTeatime · 15/07/2026 17:53

Yes I think they were trolling a little bit, making the most of things they were already doing.

I also thought the visit to Hastings, on the day the ANL judgement happened, was interesting, given Harry’s nickname ‘Harold’. Although it tied in with the Bayeux Tapestry as well, of course, the contrast between the looks, demeanour and fortunes of the two brothers was quite striking.

I may be overinvested

Thank you. I forgot that one

Mylovelygreendress · 15/07/2026 18:44

Been looking after grandchildren today so only dipped in a couple of times but finally caught up ( with glass of wine in hand).
Thanks for the new thread . The last one got pretty feisty !!

Dontevenlookatme · 15/07/2026 18:44

New username <twirls>.

Ohpleeeease is no more.

Aprilfountain · 15/07/2026 19:00

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 17:47

If only. 🙏🏾

Yes, what on earth is that all about, forcing a pill into a young woman's mouth?
I honestly don't get why he would do that and more importantly, how on earth does he get away with it?!

HoldMyWine · 15/07/2026 19:01

Thanks for the new thread.

Mylovelygreendress · 15/07/2026 19:14

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 17:50

Just as I predicted. It was sign posted in Roya Nikka’s first out of the starting gate piece in the Times. William the intransigent bad guy while King Pa and Harry have a cosy love in.

They just can’t resist can they?

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 19:14

Aprilfountain · 15/07/2026 19:00

Yes, what on earth is that all about, forcing a pill into a young woman's mouth?
I honestly don't get why he would do that and more importantly, how on earth does he get away with it?!

Because he was never, ever held to account and constantly protected. Those little bits of bad publicity over racist remarks, drugs and stripping in Las Vegas are probably the tip of the iceberg. A young, aspiring journalist isn’t going to blow her chance of cosying up to that crowd and getting a reputation for good sources and sound stories. But I am pretty angry that she’s been an absolute cheer leader for Harry over the years, whilst knowing what he did.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 19:15

Every since the claim of Harry forcing a female to take a pill emerged I've began to wonder is the reason Harry never publicly criticised Andrews behaviour because there's parts of his own that is similar and he doesn't want to risk that coming out?

Yes if rumours (which I won’t repeat here) turn out to be true it explains why he is keeping his head very much down with regards to his Uncle.

OP posts:
Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 19:16

Mylovelygreendress · 15/07/2026 19:14

They just can’t resist can they?

No and the DM etc are happy to pick up stories like this as the Waleses disappear for the holidays. It’s their Summer filler.

AnAutumnCrow · 15/07/2026 19:32

Indianrollerbird · 15/07/2026 19:14

Because he was never, ever held to account and constantly protected. Those little bits of bad publicity over racist remarks, drugs and stripping in Las Vegas are probably the tip of the iceberg. A young, aspiring journalist isn’t going to blow her chance of cosying up to that crowd and getting a reputation for good sources and sound stories. But I am pretty angry that she’s been an absolute cheer leader for Harry over the years, whilst knowing what he did.

Yes, it’s been quids-in o’clock for a lot of journalists (female and male) who have made £££ and $$$ by being ‘charmed’ by Harry.

Remember H’s ‘Don’t be like that, Rhiannon’ comment to the journalist? In public? The unspoken part was, ‘because we have an agreement, so don’t dick me about or I’ll cut off your access and maybe you’ll get fired.’

I hope more now shake off their residual embarrassment and tell what they know. I think many would understand that they were locked in to a horrible system, assuming they want to reform it.

AnAutumnCrow · 15/07/2026 19:34

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 19:15

Every since the claim of Harry forcing a female to take a pill emerged I've began to wonder is the reason Harry never publicly criticised Andrews behaviour because there's parts of his own that is similar and he doesn't want to risk that coming out?

Yes if rumours (which I won’t repeat here) turn out to be true it explains why he is keeping his head very much down with regards to his Uncle.

They’re all over Reddit and Quora anyway for anyone curious, assuming it’s about his army days and how he treated women?

DaisyDooley · 15/07/2026 19:44

Why was my post deleted??

MrsLeonFarrell · 15/07/2026 19:48

Targeting William isn't new, when the late Queen was alive they targeted Charles and William. It never seems to occur to them that the Heir becomes the monarch at some point.

Has As Ever being nominated for an Emmy been discussed? I'm behind the times today.

Swipe left for the next trending thread