PR disasters thread 24

[BigWillyLittleTodger]

What more summer shenanigans await us from the Montecito duo?

We got through thread 23 at break neck speed!

Hello 👋 Bigwilly! 😁 , checking in for later!

Welcome Jeff! Good to see you! 👋

😘

Thanks once again @BigWillyLittleTodger 😊 🌺

You’re very welcome! 🤗

Thanks for the new thread. Boring derail on the old one, YAWN

Hello @BigWillyLittleTodger thank you for the thread.

Feels a bit odd saying hello big willy but let's gloss over that!

Wonder if we'll get some more clapbacks before this 1000 is up

Thanks for the new thread @BigWillyLittleTodger.

Maybe we should ask them to address Harry the PAPP, since they complain about us going over old ground from 5 years ago. Drugging young women at dinner parties is brand new information.

Thanks for the new thread Todger 😆

Yes, I think ignoring is the best.
If there is an interesting point that is different, but it is usually just a dose of scolding.

Greetings Aunt Fanny, from Big Willy! Oooh err missus 😂

Thank you ❤️

Todger! 😂

Yes the telling off from apparently brand new posters who confidently swan onto a long running series and try to police posters language 🙄

MNHQ have a thread about advice for posters on the Royal Family board. I’ve commented on the derailment there.

Every since the claim of Harry forcing a female to take a pill emerged I've began to wonder is the reason Harry never publicly criticised Andrews behaviour because there's parts of his own that is similar and he doesn't want to risk that coming out?

There again maybe it's as simple as he criticised his own family about lip gloss and sausages because that affected him and his wife and felt really important to him. Whereas the victims of Andrews disguising behaviour didn't affect him so he never felt the need to call him out publicly. Also no one knew about the sausages and lip gloss atrocities and he needed to be the one who revealed that horror to the world to stop it happening to future spares and their spouses.

Personally I can do without any more discussion of curtseying.

I do genuinely like seeing people bringing alternative views but it's a shame when they're grounded in events long done and dusted where it's difficult to have one's own opinion challenged because the facts as we now know them are pretty damning and conclusive.

Does anyone else think the P&poW were actively trolling HAM in the last few weeks? Time and again I was thinking - was that deliberate, RF subtlety.

The most famous ring in the world prominent in the Snowdon pic.

The three Wales princelings, full face, in a group photo with their grandparents and uncle. A very happy, close family. At a time when HAM are back-of-the-head only and KC3 is vetoing any pics of him with the HAMlets, if he ever lets them near him.

Catherine mixing with the public at a time when HAM were demanding heightened security.

Catherine at Wimbledon, again mixing with the public. And NOT having the seats around her emptied.

Catherine at Wimbledom again showing how a green cape dress should be worn.

Catherine and William disporting themselves graciously at a polo match, and the resulting photos.

Am I wrong? Did I miss anything?

Typos and two minor edits.

Hello everybody! 👋

When you list it like that @Rhaidimiddim it does seem to be more than coincidence, but I tend to think William and Catherine can’t be bothered to play the HAM game, they don’t need to!

Call me silly! , but it seems that the new approach is to complain to mn and try and get the whole board taken down ! 🙄

It is the real you isn’t it????😱

I know they don't need to, but...

Like QE2 with her brooches and hats subtely signalling different alliegences and indicating unspoken stances, there just seemed to be too many instances of PPoW putting out stuff that undermined HAM and made then look ridiculous without any words being used.

It could, of course, just be serendipity. In which case, I hopevthey're all having a good laught at how well things landed.