As ever/WLM2- puts the boasting into hosting

[AtIusvue]

Continuing the on from the As ever thread

• Funny article from Jan Moir

https://archive.ph/UfTPx

• Turns out Chrissy wasn’t the only known bully that Meg invited onto the show. David Chang has serious anger issues and has bullied staff

https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/tvfilm/meghan-markle-s-shameless-pr-stunt-with-david-chang-is-disgusting-b1244549.html

• Megs new show hasn’t appeared in the Top ten on NF in the UK or US, which she had done for the first series. NF aren’t promoting it other that in the ‘new this week’ section. You also have to scroll along to find it.

• No stock sold out yet

Looking at that DM photo (shudder) why is centre spelt center? Is it aimed at an American audience? Very strange.

Hand on heart, is anyone really that interested in seeing their children? I just can’t see the appeal. Without wishing to be unkind, they are just children. What we’re allowed to see doesn’t indicate that there’s anything outstanding about them to anyone but their parents.

The merching is beyond creepy. M and H, here’s a tip, if you want a “normal” life, don’t keep flashing bits of your kids for public consumption. If you stop, we’ll all lose interest, I promise.

Considering the recent school shooting why on earth would you advertise to the world where your celebrity child plays football? and even if he is just wearing the top but doesn’t actually attend some mad person with a gun could think that he does actually play there.

No. No interest in the kids. I'm sure they're cute but so are little Jane and Jimmy down the road, and I have no interest in them either. Other people's children just aren't very interesting, especially with creepy heart emojis over their faces.

Well I imagine the Sussex Squad will be interested, but they are the new followers/market they need.

Doesn't bear thinking about does it?

I think if I was a parent there I'd be a tad pissed off that she is advertising the fact her son goes there seeing as Harry is a target of the Taliban and others. Yup - great idea - draw attention for the weirdos!

I did look at the FB group and while they have posted Meghan's bit from insta they are not allowing comments - surprise surprise!

I did notice however they put this up for Father's Day - hmmmmm ... looks like the company are sucking up to Harry too. Seems a bit of a coincidence.

I regularly take a grandchild an hour away to an hobby. It’s our normal.

An hours drive around LA is normal, it's massive.
Plus, the parents don't necessarily go with the child. He might just go with a nanny/driver.

@BoudiccaRuled I thought that would be the case regarding the distance. It can be like that here as well, and it’s made me think about my Thai friend who’d get in the car after school and her lunch would be served in the back from a hamper by her Ayah - her journey home took 2 hours due to traffic

it is a cynical attempt to reopen the security case by claiming the kids are in danger
But they are in danger in the UK according to Harry, aren't they? These photos were taken in the States.

Meanwhile Meghan is posting Happy Birthday to her mother with an old photo from 2017 🤷‍♀️ . Is she too busy to see her mother too?

And quite an unflattering photo of her Mom too. 😕

is this another clapback to online speculation her mother is not living with or near them anymore.

I suspect the children are simply just not very comely. The boy in particular looked a little strange in that South Africa shot, but maybe it was just a stage and he will grow into an Adonis, -like his father-. Meanwhile , all the teasers are necessary for future merchandising opportunities.

I wonder if she’s trying to avoid comparisons with Williams children?

I don't think it's appropriate to comment on children's looks! In fact it's not nice at all!

We are talking about the way Meghan uses her children to promote her show.

To me it's very odd to post such an old photograph !

I’m sorry but this is really inappropriate.

Don't comment on the appearance of the children, that's really unfair.
It's ok to criticise the behaviour of the parents and how they use their children, but the children themselves, particularly their appearance, should be off limits.

according to Harry ….

‘Archie and Lili have been blessed with their mother’s thick hair, he told us, self-effacingly, as he marveled that it won’t be long until Lili can sit on hers,”

From the images Meghan is posting, Lilibets hair length is average and doesn’t look thick at all, on the contrary it looks quite wispy.

all the speculation about their looks, good and bad, has been fueled by their parents, that’s the crux of it !

absolutely agree. Well said !

That’s the problem, they are giving out snippets of information, half hearted photos, they are inviting speculation.
It is on poor taste to suggest the children may not be good looking, I do wonder though if they are good looking enough for Meghan ie are they a good enough reflection of her. I should imagine being a narcissist she would like little versions of herself.

Someone on Twitter has put all the ‘rare’ photos of the children together in a series of posts, there are a LOT of photos, especially as they are all photos only released by their parents.

If the kids don’t look like the Spencer’s, the Sussex squad will go into meltdown.