As ever/WLM2- puts the boasting into hosting

[AtIusvue]

Continuing the on from the As ever thread

• Funny article from Jan Moir

https://archive.ph/UfTPx

• Turns out Chrissy wasn’t the only known bully that Meg invited onto the show. David Chang has serious anger issues and has bullied staff

https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/tvfilm/meghan-markle-s-shameless-pr-stunt-with-david-chang-is-disgusting-b1244549.html

• Megs new show hasn’t appeared in the Top ten on NF in the UK or US, which she had done for the first series. NF aren’t promoting it other that in the ‘new this week’ section. You also have to scroll along to find it.

• No stock sold out yet

The children won’t gain the interest she thinks because we don’t see them. Part of the interest in seeing children, including RF children, is seeing them grow and change. She’s hiding them until she needs the cash probably, by which time people have no connection to them anyway.

Quite, JSMill, but it'll only take one papped picture for Harry to start screaming again about how severe their risk is and how their security should be paid for by us - and never mind that this has all been tested to destruction already

Unless of course this was a blind and the lad doesn't attend that soccer school it would have been simple to avoid an image naming it, so it's hrad not to wonder if this was deliberate

Well, quite. I’d like to see an interviewer actually test whether Meghan (and Harry) understand these things.

In fact I’d like to see an interviewer test if they understand any of the stuff that they spout, rather than either politely moving on to the next agreed topic or backing off.

@PuzzledandpissedoffI would not be surprised if he didn’t actually go there. To me, it’s fishy that, of all the football schools and camps in Southern California, Archie just happens to go to one called GB soccer school.

If you go onto GB soccer school's website and click classes there's a boy who looks similar. Sorry don't know how to link.

Thanks GB soccer school have reposted the picture on their Facebook

Interesting

No, the boy at the front with the auburn hair.

Especially when they’re so obsessed with privacy. It’s just beyond weird.

Exactly

She could easily have hidden the name of the school. It’s not just hypocritical when you consider they claimed their dcs wouldn’t have privacy in the UK, when you consider the pair of them act like crusaders for children’s safety online, it’s just unbelievable.

I'm very uncomfortable with that sort of speculation and directing people to view pictures that are vaguely possible to be of Archie. Meghan maybe willing to use her children for click bait but the rest of us who know its a form of child abuse should never join in regardless of the circumstances.

Agree it won't be the paps because California has a law from 2013 that the children on public figures cannot be photographed without parental consent. So when you see pap shots of celebrity kids you know the parents consented.

However outing your kids extra curricular to obsessives seems like a stupid move. It could be fake news ie Archie doesn't train there but got given a shirt or went to a one-off camp or it is a cynical attempt to reopen the security case by claiming the kids are in danger (by their parents' actions)

I agree. I have asked for my post to be deleted.

I did wonder if Harry and Meghan were being paid to advertise the soccer school but then I thought nah, surely not. 🙈

Someone said the football club is in LA, which is over an hour's drive from Montecito. Isn't that a long way to go for a kids' football team?

I wouldn’t have had my post removed - the name of the school is on his tshirt for everyone to see.

Did I look at the soccer school pictures? No. I’m not interested and couldn’t care less if I never saw what the wee man looked like.

I agree with you. I have no interest in the children but I wish them well. I don’t know what the motivation was in allowing the name of the school to be included but I don’t believe it was an accident. Perhaps it’s just to remind us her dcs are British!

Perhaps they are providing advertising in return for reduced fees?

If I had a child there I would be withdrawing them.

Same. I have no interest in Archie or his sister but that FB page has pictures of loads of children. Why is Archie any different? So what if people see a picture of him kicking a ball?

It does highlight the hypocrisy over Harry's supposed paranoia over security however.

Didn’t H&M say Lillybet had long golden hair?

Can you imagine being around any child anywhere in the world who’s parents don’t allow them to have their picture taken, not even at the school natively play for eg and it means you can’t get a great picture of your child due to one thing or another. Then 3 days after the nativity play the child’s mum has a picture of the wee one on her insta page with his face hidden but wearing a tshirt with the school name on it for everyone to see 😆

Sounds like an AIBU post 😂