FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP

[Hedgehogforshort]

Hi MNHQ can you please address the issue of a certain poster called AidaP who is not participating in debate he is just trolling.

to be clear this person is a trans woman who has been convicted of violence and is posting promotion of acts of violence against women elsewhere.

in particular there is one elsewhere about using a roughly hewn rolling pin to rape women.

you realy need to look in to him it is just so not on that he is being allowed to bother us here.

Men RAPE women. They physically overpower us. Faster than us. Rape. Domestic Violence.

FFS.

If you still say women are not inherently vulnerable because of our sex, you're being goady and disingenuous. Even a kid understands women are inherently vulnerable. You're trying to argue hens are not inherently vulnerable to foxes. You are simply not real.

You realise you can turn off notifications in your account settings, right?

You still need to go to the physical web site to read messages.

That said, if you get upset by people merely replying to you, maybe a message board is not right for you.

I am also black and you don't speak for me. Most black women I know, know how seriously vulnerable we as women are. You don't speak for any black woman. Nor any woman at all.

PS. Just TURN OFF your notifications! No one uses notifications, they are not necessary. Just visit the thread on your 'watch list' on the website like every one else of us does. I don't even look at my email account I used to sign up to Mumsnet. I don't even log into it unless I need to email Mumsnet specifically about something.

Yep, a black MALE President.

Not one single woman President. White or black. GlovedhandsCecilia can't argue against that point. Because her manipulatively using the race card falls flat here.

There has been one BLACK MAN PM, but not one single black WOMAN PM. So all men, including black men, have privilege and black women do not.

Again....

Yes, thank you.

22 notifications. Multiple from same usernames. Spoil it for yourselves.

Then be proactive, simply turn them off, and focus on the posts on here. Otherwise the notifications will continue to do what notifications are designed to do, and notify you.

Don't be daft. This is an interactive messaging forum. If you don't want people to respond to you, don't post on it. It's not a soap box.

Everybody else turns notifications off. Do that, and then the issue disappears. Unless you like the notifications, because it gives you a reason to ignore people?

Guess what? You don't need a reason.

Just read the thread like a normal poster.

Talk about Main Character Syndrome!

When I reply to your posts, I'm not just talking to you, I'm also rebutting your arguments for other readers to see how wrong you are.

Exactly. Loads of posters get dozens and dozens of notifications. Hence turning them off.

A quick reminder that the uptick in bad-faith posters is to distract us from talking about

the Finnish trial

and also

the violent language used by TRA counter-demonstrators at the FWS one year anniversary demo.

FFS TURN OFF NOTIFICATIONS FROM YOUR SETTINGS!

Also they are replies. If you don't want to engage in a discussion on a discussion board, why come here? Stop wasting our time.

Spoil it for yourselves.

Lol. The daft patronisation is almost comical 😁

"You've really put me off by responding to me"

😁

This is just getting embarrassing now.

you’re giving ‘if you can’t ask nicely you can’t have it’ vibes.

When you reply like that, all it does is highlight how little substance there is behind your argument, though, to be fair, I’m not convinced you’ve even attempted to make one.

Okay. Just dont expect a response from me if you've responded to loads of them

Ive only got on quotes and updates from the OP.

I dont want people spamming me on a clunky site

Yeah when one person has quoted me 10x, it is embarrassing.

Are they quoting the same post 10 times? or interacting with ten different posts and using the provided for quote function to maintain accuracy and coherency of the discussion?

There is a obvious difference.

Even then, multiple quoting of one single post is not abusive or harassment if the poster is discussing the post from multiple angles.

It is embarrassing for whom? Them? no, it isn't. You? maybe so. If you post on a publicly accessible website, you cannot control the interaction.

No idea. I dont read it.

But if we didn't respond we'd be being rude and exclusive and something.

I'm finding it increasingly hard to be polite on these threads atm.

So you're not engaging with the discussion. That being the case, why are you here?