FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP

[Hedgehogforshort]

Hi MNHQ can you please address the issue of a certain poster called AidaP who is not participating in debate he is just trolling.

to be clear this person is a trans woman who has been convicted of violence and is posting promotion of acts of violence against women elsewhere.

in particular there is one elsewhere about using a roughly hewn rolling pin to rape women.

you realy need to look in to him it is just so not on that he is being allowed to bother us here.

Exactly.

Well, quite.

It's this realisation that has turned me over the last decade from a chilled-out feminist who wasn't that fussed, really, into the raging and very feminist middle-aged woman you see before you today.

That's not a rebuttal of my points. Your blackness doesn't leave you with two-thirds of the physical strength of a white person who shares your sex and age, does it?

It leaves me with less than two thirds of the social power in many situations.

So no.

Yes, and I think I acknowledged that power imbalance between black and white people and ascribed it to social constructs.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/vulnerable
"Vulnerable (adjective): able to be easily physically or mentally hurt, influenced, or attacked."

Note: "easily physically [...] hurt". It's not about having mental decision-making capacity, but about whether someone can easily hurt you.

In a racist society, black people are vulnerable to being harmed because, as you describe from your experience, you lack social power. Institutions that should protect and serve you often don't. In a hypothetical non-racist society, that vulnerability would disappear.

By contrast, it wouldn't matter how non-sexist a society was, women would still be vulnerable to attack by men. We would still be vulnerable to forced impregnation by men. It might be rarer, and more reliably result in jail time for our attackers, but that vulnerability would still be there because we are smaller, weaker, and have ovaries and a uterus. And that's the key difference between sex and race.

You're right about there being parallels too: institutions that should protect and serve women are failing us, just as they fail black people (and in the case of black women, doubly fail as Jennifer Melle found out). If they were working, Nurse Melle, the Darlington nurses, and Sandie Peggie would not have needed to take legal action at all.

Nevertheless, the biological differences between men and women can't be reformed away and women will always be vulnerable to male assault and forced pregnancy through rape because of this.

Really? So how come there has been a black president of the USA but never a woman president? Therefore that would suggest woman have less power than black people no?

It would suggest that, in the specific case of the US electorate choosing who to run their country, they trust black men over all women. This shouldn't be extrapolated into all situations, if only because the sample set (fortyish presidents) is too small and the situation too specific.

ETA: the sample set is actually the entire US electorate.

Second edit: "black people" is misleading, and I think you meant "black men". Black women are a subset of black people, and they are doubly-disadvantaged through race and sex.

Does this help you? I answered the top post of Shedmistress. (Apologies for the arrangement of posts - I wasn’t able to copy them properly. Hazelberry’s was first, Shedmistress’ was last.)

Shedmistress · Yesterday 09:24
People cant fund raise on here. Just FYI. It would very quickly get zapped.
SamphiretheTervosaur · Yesterday 09:21
I haven't been here much recently, that sort of surprises me...
hazelberry · 09/04/2026 18:05
Some on FWR were fund raising for him a few months ago.

Sure. That was you responding to the crowdfunding aspect.

The point Eresh was making is why was he introduced in the first place and she quoted the post to clarify.

And she is right, he was introduced as a distraction tactic based on ‘whataboutery’ and trying to portray a man who posts on here occasionally and doesn’t post abusively on threads on MN as being some kind of comparator.

We've had 3 female PMs and no black one.

And yet, because of racism, anti-discrimination laws and policies are built on safeguarding principles to protect people where ever possible.

Do you think safeguarding is infantilising? Why?

If you would rather not have protective laws, how do you think that would work? Do you think that even the first momentum of anti- discrimination awareness would have been maintained if there were not the protections put in place? And to be clear, I refer to protections in law and not some of the programmes developed to address discrimination under the EDI banner.

Do you believe that Ayn Rand’s utopian development has been achieved and if all is now left without law protection racism will be a thing of the past?

He has returned on a new thread. Tsk…

Until someone posts his nasty little 'rolling pin' comment. Seems to have a garlic/vampire effect.

They did - like the description

No but if they said she should be "hung by a tree" that would be different considering the history of lynching African Americans.

Saying a woman should be 'fucked' (read: raped) with an object designed to inflict damage and pain is clearly sex-specific, as hung by a tree is race-specific. The fact that these males frequently talk about raping and sexually assaulting feminists shows that it's about rape, and you aren't fooling anyone by you pretending it isn't, you are being disingenuous.

Get back to us when women are giving RAPE THREATS and DEATH THREATS to the men. Until then 'it's both sides' is just typical MRA/TRA lies and we don't believe the act.

There is a power differential. A female saying that is completely different from a male from a group of males who advocate women be raped and assaulted and 'die in a greasefire' and be 'curbstomped' and be 'burned alive' and 'raped til your insides bleed' comes from a completely different place.

This should not even need to be said or explained.

Then you're not grounded in reality. Women ARE inherently vulnerable because of our sex. That is reality. At least one in 4 women is raped. One of them is me. I KNOW how vulnerable women are by personal experience. Domestic Violence. And 3 women per week are killed by men. A Scottish survey found 96% of all women had been sexually harassed at one point in their lives. Ninety-six percent. 96%. Everything that women do each day is outlined in this meme shows we ARE inherently vulnerable and denying it, is misogynistic and disingenuous.

If you don't think something from a group of males who regularly talk about raping women til they bleed and being raped with a razor-covered baseball bat is a rape threat, I suggest you spend some time visiting a rape crisis centre. Your ignorance comes from a lack of education and experience. Not your fault but instead of attacking people who are trying to educate you, maybe listen and consider that you may be wrong. I can promise you any counsellor at a rape crisis centre will set you straight that what he said most definitely is a rape threat. No doubt about that.

you’re making yourself look extremely foolish here @GlovedhandsCeciliaapologising for Aida. I assume you’re aware of the content they publish elsewhere and are totally fine with it?