Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP

513 replies

Hedgehogforshort · 08/04/2026 20:35

Hi MNHQ can you please address the issue of a certain poster called AidaP who is not participating in debate he is just trolling.

to be clear this person is a trans woman who has been convicted of violence and is posting promotion of acts of violence against women elsewhere.

in particular there is one elsewhere about using a roughly hewn rolling pin to rape women.

you realy need to look in to him it is just so not on that he is being allowed to bother us here.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
WearyAuldWumman · 13/04/2026 15:50

I’m reminded of the kids at school who, when told to hand a form or the like to their mum, start screaming “Don’t you talk about my mum!” in the hope that the HT will overhear and misunderstand.

Helleofabore · 13/04/2026 15:50

WearyAuldWumman · 13/04/2026 15:46

You don’t understand a very common colloquialism? That’s genuinely surprising.

Either that, or you’re trying to twist what was said.

It is not even SirChenjins who referring to.

SirChenjins · 13/04/2026 15:51

I did nothing of the sort @GlovedhandsCecilia

You're posting so often and getting so confused about what posts you're responding to that you're getting yourself tied up in knots.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/04/2026 15:52

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 15:42

I was the one who said it was banter so it was about how I interpreted Aida's comment. Then poster then.suggested that as we are both boys, we will agree.

If you're going to gaslight, at least be good at it.

Literally no one, other than apparently you, would read that as suggesting you and P, "are both boys, [so] we will agree"

"Boys will be boys" is, to use the theme of the thread, a very well known colloquialism (in the UK at least - I can't speak for other countries) used by both sexes to dismiss the bad behaviour of boys and men.

I realise here I'm just saying what has already been said but I'm backing up SirChenjins interpretation is how many people including me would read that post. Your interpretation of it as suggesting you are male wouldn't have crossed my mind in a million years.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 13/04/2026 15:55

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 15:39

Nope its a way for me to use the site in a way that I enjoy. You aren't silenced. You can post what you want as many times as you want.

So you didn't write “Spoil it for yourselves" then?

It's a silencing tactic to deter us from replying to you, by your own words from earlier. We can see what you wrote earlier, and now you are trying to gaslight us about it.

FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP
Datun · 13/04/2026 15:56

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 15:19

Because I want to know when someone has directly quoted me, within reason.

But you see that by reading the thread like everyone else!

People are responding to you on the thread.

The notifications you get are when people are doing that. It's not necessary to read them, and it's not spam.

NoWordForFluffy · 13/04/2026 16:09

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/04/2026 15:52

Literally no one, other than apparently you, would read that as suggesting you and P, "are both boys, [so] we will agree"

"Boys will be boys" is, to use the theme of the thread, a very well known colloquialism (in the UK at least - I can't speak for other countries) used by both sexes to dismiss the bad behaviour of boys and men.

I realise here I'm just saying what has already been said but I'm backing up SirChenjins interpretation is how many people including me would read that post. Your interpretation of it as suggesting you are male wouldn't have crossed my mind in a million years.

Also posting to confirm that's my interpretation of what was posted too.

NoWordForFluffy · 13/04/2026 16:10

I believe there's quite the derail going on right now!

SirChenjins · 13/04/2026 16:17

NoWordForFluffy · 13/04/2026 16:10

I believe there's quite the derail going on right now!

Just a bit!

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/04/2026 16:31

FWIW I don't think GlovedhandsCecilia is targeting or attempting to disrupt FWR specifically as her approach to other topics is similar. An idiosyncratic perspective rather than bad faith.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:33

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/04/2026 15:40

So can others 🤷‍♀️

Yes they can. I dont demand anyone reply to me

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:34

Datun · 13/04/2026 15:56

But you see that by reading the thread like everyone else!

People are responding to you on the thread.

The notifications you get are when people are doing that. It's not necessary to read them, and it's not spam.

It is spamming my notifications when I have twenty of them.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:35

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/04/2026 15:52

Literally no one, other than apparently you, would read that as suggesting you and P, "are both boys, [so] we will agree"

"Boys will be boys" is, to use the theme of the thread, a very well known colloquialism (in the UK at least - I can't speak for other countries) used by both sexes to dismiss the bad behaviour of boys and men.

I realise here I'm just saying what has already been said but I'm backing up SirChenjins interpretation is how many people including me would read that post. Your interpretation of it as suggesting you are male wouldn't have crossed my mind in a million years.

Okay.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:36

Helleofabore · 13/04/2026 15:43

No.. we know. We understand.

You are here to tell us your opinion and then complain when people interact with your opinion. And generally seem keen to tell us how wrong we are without really giving any coherent reasons why.

We get it.

Why do you need to interact with my opinion? It isnt my thread.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:37

Helleofabore · 13/04/2026 15:48

"I was the one who said it was banter so it was about how I interpreted Aida's comment. Then poster then.suggested that as we are both boys, we will agree."

"If you're going to gaslight, at least be good at it."

Have you confused the posters? Because what you have just written is not what SirChenjins said. The 'boy' in what SirChenjins post is clearly Aida, the person who made the rape suggestion in the first place.

Perhaps you need to stop personally attacking posters.

Edited

Ok

Waitingfordoggo · 13/04/2026 16:43

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 15:18

Its the argument that someone came with. They said its weird that I think TWAM but defend Aida's language. I dont see how the two sre remotely related. Do you?

That isn’t what I said. Seems you didn’t read or didn’t understand my posts. I said that it’s great that you realise TW are men. And then I said I couldn’t understand why you were defending Aida so vehemently when a large proportion of posters here are threatened and insulted by Aida’s language. I said it was a strange hill to die on… as in, why waste so many hours trying to convince strangers on the internet that they shouldn’t feel threatened by someone’s language (because you’re not going to be able to convince strangers of that, even with your anecdote about a person you know who says people should fuck themselves with a spiky butt plug, which is also a highly offensive thing to say and not something I’d want to hear in the workplace). I wonder at your motivation in trying to persuade us that Aida’s words are just banter.

Datun · 13/04/2026 16:44

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:34

It is spamming my notifications when I have twenty of them.

It's responding to you, though. It's a mutual interaction.

You have no idea what's in the comments, either, as you don't read them.

Helleofabore · 13/04/2026 16:45

So ... a poster interacts with others posts on a thread, sometimes more than one post at a time causing numerous notifications to be sent, and this is ok but when others do it to them it is aggressive behaviour?

Datun · 13/04/2026 16:45

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/04/2026 16:31

FWIW I don't think GlovedhandsCecilia is targeting or attempting to disrupt FWR specifically as her approach to other topics is similar. An idiosyncratic perspective rather than bad faith.

Got it.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:47

Helleofabore · 13/04/2026 16:45

So ... a poster interacts with others posts on a thread, sometimes more than one post at a time causing numerous notifications to be sent, and this is ok but when others do it to them it is aggressive behaviour?

i didnt say it is aggressive. Its mainly annoying.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:48

Datun · 13/04/2026 16:44

It's responding to you, though. It's a mutual interaction.

You have no idea what's in the comments, either, as you don't read them.

I know.

Waitingfordoggo · 13/04/2026 16:48

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 15:22

I dont think i am in the minority. I just think you are very invested in seeing the worst in anything a trans person says. If you read other threads about this thread on the Internet, you'll see other people disagree with you, too. Irrespective of whether they think.l TWAW or TWAM. They think this is a reach.

It doesn’t matter to me whether other people that I don’t know think it’s ’a reach’.

I don’t want to spend time in a message board with a man who says things like that. I don’t want to hear men use threatening language against women. I find it threatening and so do plenty of others.

You and some others don’t find it threatening. So what? That doesn’t change how I feel. It doesn’t matter whether the person saying it has a trans identity or is GC or somewhere in between. The language is threatening whoever it comes from.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:49

Waitingfordoggo · 13/04/2026 16:43

That isn’t what I said. Seems you didn’t read or didn’t understand my posts. I said that it’s great that you realise TW are men. And then I said I couldn’t understand why you were defending Aida so vehemently when a large proportion of posters here are threatened and insulted by Aida’s language. I said it was a strange hill to die on… as in, why waste so many hours trying to convince strangers on the internet that they shouldn’t feel threatened by someone’s language (because you’re not going to be able to convince strangers of that, even with your anecdote about a person you know who says people should fuck themselves with a spiky butt plug, which is also a highly offensive thing to say and not something I’d want to hear in the workplace). I wonder at your motivation in trying to persuade us that Aida’s words are just banter.

Edited

Im not trying to convince anyone of anything. I just shared my interpretation and tried to understand theirs.

BIWI · 13/04/2026 16:50

Not much understanding going on though.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 13/04/2026 16:52

BIWI · 13/04/2026 16:50

Not much understanding going on though.

No i dont understand interpreting that statement that way.

Swipe left for the next trending thread