FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP

[Hedgehogforshort]

Hi MNHQ can you please address the issue of a certain poster called AidaP who is not participating in debate he is just trolling.

to be clear this person is a trans woman who has been convicted of violence and is posting promotion of acts of violence against women elsewhere.

in particular there is one elsewhere about using a roughly hewn rolling pin to rape women.

you realy need to look in to him it is just so not on that he is being allowed to bother us here.

You have seen other discussions about that particular post on other parts of the internet? Where?

I’m guessing reddit. So far, so very predictable!

If you post ten posts, expect ten responses.

You are carrying out the most blatant and protracted tone-policing operation that I have ever seen, as well as trying to gaslight women that a published desire to carry out a Section Two sexual assault with a splintery rolling pin isn't a threat of sexual violence.

You must know where there are "spotting" sites for mumsnet. Facebook, reddit, etc.

Isn't tone policing. Telling you that I wont respond to you if I have more than 10 notifications is just me enforcing my boundaries. You can post what you want in whatever tone you want. I'm just telling you how you can get a response back from me.

didn’t this gloved person start out pretending they’re GC? LOL.

I'm guessing aida is loving this attention
Just a wild guess

Actually, it is interesting that you went straight to that as an interpretation.

This discussion isn't actually centred on you, despite what you think.

This is the post:

Threatening violent rape with a splintery rolling pin is just banter
Boys will be boys, eh?

I read it and understood that SirChejins was referring to a disturbing social dynamic of some people in general (not YOU) dismissing that rape threat. Do you have an issue with working out what is and is not something posted that directly refers to you?

The "boy" in question is AidaP. Women have also said "boys will be boys" instead of raising their expectations of male behaviour. Female schoolteachers at my primary school did this. No one is accusing you of being a man. Again, tone-policing through manufactured outrage.

You think any woman who doesnt see the world like you do must have a penis?

Interesting choice of words that can only make sense if you think that women can have penises...

No. Is there?

Well now. That is interesting that you know this and yet chose to come and tell us all how wrong we all are and that you just happened to be reading our posts and how that has completely changed your view on the issues, doesn't it.

Ive never identified as GC. I said I dont think TWAW. I dont identify with this "movement" of yours at all.

Calm down. It's a colloquialism (I know you like these) about the behaviour of boys and men - who is, on this thread, AidaP - and the quote about splintery rolling pins and fucking women with them that was referred tocame from his twisted little mind.

You can enforce that boundary by turning your notifications off like everyone else does.

Posting and then trying to persuade others not to reply by claiming not to read replies if there are "too many" is a silencing tactic designed to shut down criticism of your gaslighting.

allrighty then.
(I think we need to stop making sense of something nonsensical, everyone)

Nope its a way for me to use the site in a way that I enjoy. You aren't silenced. You can post what you want as many times as you want.

A poster who has spent a day (or more?) making it clear that responses to their posts are unacceptable harassment then asking a question is being unreasonable.

I suggest taking the question itself to AIBU and polling what the overall reaction is.

It's like the person over the weekend who got very huffy when someone said their accusations of hysteria were in and of themselves misogynist, and demanded to be told where they had called anyone hysterical. Even though their very next post was an accusation of hysteria.

(can't remember whether it was older or newer but they were adjacent and both visible at the same time)

So can others 🤷‍♀️

I was the one who said it was banter so it was about how I interpreted Aida's comment. Then poster then.suggested that as we are both boys, we will agree.

If you're going to gaslight, at least be good at it.

No.. we know. We understand.

You are here to tell us your opinion and then complain when people interact with your opinion. And generally seem keen to tell us how wrong we are without really giving any coherent reasons why.

We get it.

You’ll put your back out with these reaches if you aren’t careful.

Reminder:

• Finnish trial
• TRA abusive language at FWR anniversary demo
• Jennifer Melle has won a settlement that includes reinstatement and her NHS trust have published an acknowledgement that the TIM patient subjected her to unacceptable racial abuse

This uptick in bad faith posters is to distract us from these significant news items.

You don’t understand a very common colloquialism? That’s genuinely surprising.

Either that, or you’re trying to twist what was said.

"I was the one who said it was banter so it was about how I interpreted Aida's comment. Then poster then.suggested that as we are both boys, we will agree."

"If you're going to gaslight, at least be good at it."

Have you confused the posters? Because what you have just written is not what SirChenjins said. The 'boy' in what SirChenjins post is clearly Aida, the person who made the rape suggestion in the first place.

Perhaps you need to stop personally attacking posters.