Starmer son finds a quiet place to study for GCSEs

[justasking111]

Can't berate Starmer for this but think some parents will be aghast.

"PM suggests £20,000 accommodation donation was for 'son to find somewhere for GCSE revision' | Evening Standard" https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/keir-starmer-donation-son-gcse-housing-acoommodation-prime-minister-b1183972.html

Don’t worry - Rayners mates in the unions, the media, the markets, the rebels and labours own capacity to fuck things up themselves, will
keep things spicy.

We are patient.

Yes they did.

Rishi moved from Yorkshire where his constituency was to London and back.

Boris moved between chequers and Downing Street. Both places he was working.

I can’t stand the Tories. But what business reason was he moving between his house and the flat?

You don’t think telling people to stay at home while pretending to be in your own home, but actually in a mates flat, for no good reason, isn’t dishonest?

Exactly the same applies to Sunak and Boris, as it does Starmer.

What possible business reason did any of them have? they ALL told us to stay at home, they ALL did the opposite.

Downing street is perfectly capable of being suitable to run the Govt from, not a pad in Yorkshire.

I'm critical of all of them, on this but you and others, only Starmer.

Starmer is thinking globally

For the nth time.

Starmer is in power.

I'll ask again, what does the existence of these consortiums have to do with the Labour party? Where have you read / what evidence do you have that they intend to sell off the NHS to them???

I addressed those issues because they were the ones that were raised.

Non of them should have done if they didn’t need to.

But going to your constituency is a work reason. It’s one of his places of work.

I have no idea why Boris was at chequers. And I have no idea if they were doing this at times we were told not to travel at all. But if they were, they shouldn’t have been doing it either.

But staying in your mates flat for no reason (KS doesn’t live far from it) whilst telling people to stay at home and pretending you are at home is dishonest.

And my point was he was dishonest then and he is being dishonest about why he had use of the flat now.

I can’t see anyone suggesting the Tories aren’t dishonest and self serving. But so is KS. They are the same.

He wasn’t during the pandemic.

True. So this freebie flat for those not in power?

Sorry, I thought the thread topic was Starmer and his interpretation of reality?

Silly me.

Many thanks

I think it's just a mixed conversation covering the flat during the pandemic which funnily enough is still his interpretation of reality

Logically they'll lease, the consortium takes over hospitals, modernization takes place. Time and motion people move in cut out the deadwood. Improve efficiency. The operations, care will then be billed to the government at a lower price than the NHS can achieve. You'll have private and NHS patients in the same hospital.

It will be a two tier system.

Yes. It is.

And his interpretations have been on display for quite a while.

Its entirely relevant to the conversation if you want to bother reading the posts.

Hey you both dislike him

That's great ;

@80smonster Starmer is a "dangerous monster"?! I think the word hyperbole was invented for this kind of comment.

If the media and public had been up in arms for even a tiny portion of all the shite the Tories did when they were in power, this country would be in a much much better state than it is now.

"Let the bodies pile high". Now that is the sort of thing you'd expect a "monster" to say.

Who do you want in charge?

@justasking111

"deltabluesandpinks
I'll ask again, what does the existence of these consortiums have to do with the Labour party? Where have you read / what evidence do you have that they intend to sell off the NHS to them???

Logically they'll lease, the consortium takes over hospitals, modernization takes place. Time and motion people move in cut out the deadwood. Improve efficiency. The operations, care will then be billed to the government at a lower price than the NHS can achieve. You'll have private and NHS patients in the same hospital.

It will be a two tier system."

So none then. None at all. Thanks for clearing that up.

Or how about a report that states 4000 people will die in 2017 from Labour

Then refusing to do an impact assessment when introducing the policy

That's not even a comment that's policy and outcome

No wonder we are here when you'd ignore the former and hold on to the latter

Did you miss the entire reorganising of society to huge damage and cost btw

Why didn't Labour do an impact assessment if they want to avoid those deaths?

With all due respect, it's simple economics.

Why do you think Starmer had a two hour dinner with trump last night rather than Harris?

Tony Blair worth between 45 and 65 million, Cherie Blair, who knows. Euan Blair £374 million.
Gordon brown 15 million.

These are smart people.

This puzzled me as well.

I guess he had to stay somewhere overnight so tried to build relationship?

Trump has connections, Kamala doesn't.

No coverage of that one. Can you imagine what went on

I think Lammy was there too

No doubt a few jokes about freebies at the expense of the public were offered up by Keir

@justasking111 if it's simple economics why did the Tories not bring it in?

David Milliband who I had a soft spot for earns a million a year with a charity.

Nick Clegg was worth £20 million, he works for FB.

These are clever men. Today we don't have politicians who are statesmen.