Brilliantly clear, thank you!
The article I linked to suggests 'dog typing up' 'going to an appointment', witness at 9:33am, was the woman who told the police:
A friend who wishes to stay anonymous, told the Mirror she has spoken to a pair who believe they were the last people to see Nicola before she went missing. She said: "They say she was laughing and joking with them as she went by."
The devil is so often in the detail and these sort of nuggets of information can be lost to the timeline and to history. Am sure the police will, of course, have clear witness statements and the press can muddle. BUT in case anything has slipped through net or been forgotten important things are revisited. No doubt they will be and PF, seems very dogged in his determination to do this and more.
- DO we know, with a source preferably, IF Willow was tied to the bench until Paul arrived and Nicola's phone remained, untouched, on the bench?
2.Did 'dog tying witness' talk to the pair who saw Nicola 'laughing and joking' as well as two people who 'tried to get the phone off lock screen' and man who suggested Nicola had had a 'medical event'? So, this is her testimony to the police? Poss hence police appeals for these people to come forward? Red jacket woman etc? All very unclear.
9:33am to 10:50am (from memory, is that right 10:50), we assume a secured Willow was at the bench, next to Nicola's phone which presumably Paul had rung, when exactly?
Willow's collar, seems she did have an identity disc, if so, whose number was on it and instead of multi guessing, why not call it? Perhaps the original witness did and it went to Nicola's phone? Whose number was on it.
Indeed, to the multiple witnesses, which does make it harder for me she was abducted down the only path she could have left by.