I won't make one.
I think the police have been a disgrace. It's been them and their "We think she went into the river" assertions from the start that led to speculation because it put across to the general public that they weren't fully looking at alternatives.
If they'd started off with, there are various scenarios and we're looking at them all, without being specific as to their preferred one I think it could have been potentially different.
On top of that, although they looked at CCTV and dashcams etc. they ruled out foul play so there were no forensics on or around the bench (a search, but not a forensic search).
That the family and the police have been at odds has been very obvious, and now we know why. The family don't necessarily believe she's in the river, the police do think that's what happened.
It now makes sense why Paul her partner was keen to get Peter F involved and why he did the documentary. They've not accepted the police line.
And now, because of their failings, the police decided to mention vulnerabilities at a presser, what on earth made them think it wouldn't fuel more pressure and speculation?
And now poor Nicola's life has been laid bare because the police have been trying to cover their backs from their own mistakes they made throughout.
Just because someone has had a recent dealing with police, and has alcohol problems, doesn't automatically mean they are in a river when they disappear.
Absolutely disgraceful.