Missing Woman Nicola Bulley 3

[ofwarren]

I couldn't see another post so thought I'd create one.

There is a police press conference this afternoon. I can't see a time for this but it's sounding like a routine one.

Fair enough.

I heard some vile old women jabbering away about it the other day
Oh the irony.

What do you expect them to do, sit in revered silence with their head's bowed?

Of course they're going to be chit chatting until the press conference starts.

I saw a twitter feed with the following suggestions:

1. accident in/by the river (not looking likely, no evidence)
2. murdered by someone she knows (by who? Why? How?)
3. has intentionally gone missing (how? Why?)
4. she's complicit in a scam, she's safe and well (I doubt it)
5. she's not complicit, it's a kidnap (unlikely kidnap victim, surely?)
6. she's been taken by a stranger and has been killed
7. she's been taken by a stranger and is still with him, but alive

I don't think it's offensive at all to talk about it.

We just feel for her and her family and we're trying to make sense of it. So sad and baffling. If only her dog could talk!!!

So sad :(

"What do you expect them to do, sit in revered silence with their head's bowed?

Of course they're going to be chit chatting until the press conference starts."

No not at all

Yet here you are.

Each case is different, most missing people return home within a short period of time. This case is different, a woman vanished into thin air after dropping her kids of at a village school, her phone is found in an unexpected place, her poor dog was running around distressed without her owner, the woman was logged onto a Teams call and vanished during bright day light within a very short time window. There is a river but everything points to her not being in the river, yet police insist she is. There is so much in this particular case that's unusual and rather disturbing.

another could be that she fell in but the body was taken away from the river afterwards. There was no police taping off the site in the early days.

But they're getting slated for it and I think they're unaware that camera is streaming live. The woman testing the microphones was having a good old giggle and probably wouldn't have done

As she would in option 3, it’s a scam she’s in on.

the police are under huge pressure watching this press conference, this officer seems to be just defending their actions. As last time she was all she’s defo fallen in the river.

Posters on Twitter are saying that the police have ruled out her leaving the park because the gates are covered by CCTV and been checked.

Although I think the most likely scenario is that she's in the river, there must be other ways out. A country park wouldn't be sealed up like Fort Knox.

Every park I've ever been in with my dog has had bushes/trees around the boundary with gaps that can be squeezed through, and fences that can be easily climbed.

I think if she was in the river at least an item of clothing would have been found by now.

The presser is just a defence of their police work .

the pressure must be horrendous

Is is Superintendent Riley again? Will be interesting to see if Peter Faulding is asked for his opinion....

They still believe she fell in.

If the phone was a decoy what is the Wi-Fi signal like in that area? Would she have a good signal for a Teams meeting? Are the times on the cctv correct? Mine is 5 minutes fast and when the clocks to forward it's an hour and 5 minutes behind. If I knew how to change the time I would but I tie myself in knots trying to work out the time between March and October.

OK, so your hypothesis is that between 9.10 and 9.20 someone abducted Nicola, rounded up her dog and delivered it plus phone to the riverbank bench? All in 10 min?

Yes. Police chief saying still the police believe Nicola fell into the river but are open to other lines of enquiry. And asking people not to speculate

If she has sadly fallen in the river, wouldn't an item of clothing have been found by now if not her body ?

She’s referenced his company by name as a partner a couple of times.

The police officer speaking there (sorry I don't know her proper title) looks like she hasn't sleep for a week

There is no evidence that she was ever at the bench is there, so it's just being presumed she was because of the phone and dog, but surely that's not hard enough evidence ?

I honestly thought they must've found her to have called the press conference.

Her poor family.

From previous thread:

I just don’t know how many ‘presumed drowning’ in a 100 mile? radius would be considered ‘normal’.

Including suicides, around 600 people a year die by drowning in the UK - almost 2 a day. So, in a 100-mile radius you would expect something like 4 or 5 a week.