So much speculation and nonsense on here by people who think they are detectives.
speculation and wondering about stuff I get, but things like saying the police should have measured the water speed in MPH (flow rate is how you would measure water in cubic meters)
to talking about how if she was in the river her body wouldn’t be able to get over the weir. Or that she couldn’t have drowned and would have been caught by the weir. (Weirs are some of the most dangerous places in water with the backwash creating turbulent waters even on what’s looks like a serene waterway, this can trap and drown people very easily)
other saying the river looks slow. It could be but looking at the surface or a river doesn’t give a good indication of the flow rate under it and the power it has.
also those saying police should have launched a criminal investigation or the rules one out.
they haven’t ruled one out and for it to be more than a missing persons case there needs to be evidence pointing to something, if there isn’t they cannot launch a criminal investigation just because they feel like it.
also saying there is no evidence it was an accident isn’t evidence that there was foul play involved.
those also saying they didn’t do any forensics - from what I’ve read and seen they did at the beginning so once they have what they need there isn’t further reason to keep everything else in a sterile environment and have it cordoned off or keep retesting, this isn’t CSI
I get we all get invested in these things and we all have our thoughts and speculation and view on how the investigation is being carried out but some of the stuff on here is wildly fanciful being passed off as either fact or ‘I know better’