investigate 9/11

[BeetrootsResolution]

My uncle sent me this and thought it was an appropriate time to share it with you

The Truth?

Um, but surely with this conspiracy, they've not been too careful about not looking suspicious.

Anyway, with their skills, surely a heart attack here, a car crash there, and there'd be nobody left to reveal the truth.

And what was the MOTIVE? And why out of the thousands of people who must have been involved in this massive conspiracy - firefighters, police, air traffic controllers, army etc etc has nobody come forward? It just makes no sense.

Obviously, the REAL conspiracy is the fact that the WTC never actually existed. They needed to turn the hologram off on September 11th, for maintenance, but were worried people would spot it ... hence all this faff with aircraft.

The Pentagon crash was just to test the newly reinforced bit (which is the bit they hit!). And the plane that went down in the field, that was a special favour for Hollywood, to give them a story to dramatise, so they didn't reveal the true story behind 911.

No money to be made from killing off book authors

Aloha...all these people would probably not of known!
The firefighters etc...they wouldn't of known if it was all down to the government...they'd of just done their jobs.

Fire fighters were ignored!!! Many many fire fighters were in the building when bomb blasts went off...one fire fighter was on the 8th floor when a bomb blast shot him across the room... lots of people at that exact time reported bomb blasts in the buildings..in the basements...they were all ignored!
There is footage of this...all just ignored

There are secrets in bank vaults, heck there are secrets in my loft - I'm guessing there were secrets in the WTC too. From what we know of corporate business, the WTC probabl yheld a lot of real dogdy dossiers.

Whatever, we can't know everything

That was re why special forces might have been sent in

I'm not at all surprised there were explosions in the WTC towers after the planes hit. Fires and heat can cause things to explode that wouldn't normally. This isn't exactly proof bombs were involved.

How many SAS agents does it take to wire up a building?

Its not a joke

They don't need firefighters, police, air traffic controllers, army involved - those forces are for the clean up. Seems like some people lost their jobs if they opened their mouths.

The truth is just our perception and as we can see from this thread is varies. So even if a air traffic controller said one thing, well we don't have to take his word, or her word, or anyones word...

just like glitterfairy said... the earth is round the flat

I think they would need firefighters and police involved, particularly for the bits where they smuggle bodies into buildings that are on fire.

WEll, actually, if all the real planes were downed, the passengers removed and shot/gassed/fed to lions and then the planes were replaced with dummy planes/missiles/holograms that would certainly be noticed by air traffic control, don't you think?

I more surprised that they didn't fall down sooner.

But there's a very simple explanation of the way they went down in their cantilever floor design - we learnt that in modern architecture lectures

I don't think you mean SAS, do you?

"The insignificant fires burning in WTC 7 have always been a sticking point for 9/11 researchers who rightfully doubt that fires so small could ever have brought the building down. Indeed, in all the history of firefighting, no steel-framed high-rise has ever collapsed due to fire. Even in the case of major infernos that entirely engulfed such buildings in the past, no office fire had ever burnt hot enough to compromise the strength of the massive steel beams that support these structures. The physics simply do not support this phenomenon ? that is, of course, with one exception. On 9/11, the laws of physics were apparently suspended and three such anomalies occurred. Those who argue that the towers fell because the planes caused structural damage in addition to fire damage cannot, however, apply this theory to the anomalous collapse of WTC 7."

from link Jan last gave.

MT you are suprised they did not fall down sooner!!! They fell down super fast if you compare skyscraper fires burning 20 hours etc and not collapsing!

Hi, did you look at my link re WTC7? There is evidence that WT7 was damaged pretty extensively by fire and falling debris - doesn't look trivial damage to me. Plus quotes from firefighters.

here it is again!

Not many skyscrapers have been hit by planes.

Giving an example Aloha based on information about the Secret Service Special Officer Miller - it would have been a team effort whichever organisation they were affiliated with...

Buring, yes - being smashed into by jets, no - that was remarkable

Do you really think this 'conspiracy' involves the British Army? I don't think even the wilder websites suggest that.

I checked out that page Aloha and this one linked to it

this

the fire did look limited to an area of the building - the big hole could well be window smashed, floor damage - but actual steel structural damage.... mmmm I am still not convinced.

I think WTC7 looks pretty badly damaged and on fire, don't you?

I think WTC7 looks pretty badly damaged and on fire, don't you?

Millions of people watched both towers crumble to the ground on live television on Septemer 11. It was Bin Laden and his croanies. We know this to be fact. It is hardly debatable.

Yes lots of smoke and abit of fire but look at the flames in this building and it did not fall down...

HUGE FLAMES coming well out of the building not just contained inside.

It is quite a contrast - that alone seems to me to show why people query the collapse.

ludaloo - interesting link - who is Jeff King?

So we have all sorts of theories with lots of believable and unbelievable parts -