Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

investigate 9/11

1000 replies

BeetrootsResolution · 30/12/2006 12:39

My uncle sent me this and thought it was an appropriate time to share it with you

The Truth?

OP posts:
JoolsToo · 01/01/2007 23:18

this thread is totally fascinating

whatwouldjesusdo · 01/01/2007 23:18

lol sophable

I have been around for ages, but I change nickname often to limit the damage in case my violent and controlling ex ever discovers mn, and recognises himself from one of my rants. Children have seen me posting, and think mn is hilarious, and may talk about it in front of ex.

whatwouldjesusdo · 01/01/2007 23:20

(Im not ruty btw)

JoolsToo · 01/01/2007 23:20

ruty is wwjesusd?

JoolsToo · 01/01/2007 23:20

thank you

ludaloo · 01/01/2007 23:28

another opinion

God...I have now spent way to long thinking about this! But...this is very interesting to watch!

ludaloo · 01/01/2007 23:41

Watch this...thermite characteristics....

thermite

Now watch this one...and watch the edge of the tower...at the thermite look a like stuff pooring out!!!

tower

Its just all soooo mind boggling!!

I really must go to bed!!!

JanH · 01/01/2007 23:50

Well I have just come across another fascinating site - found it via a link on a website in one of mb's sensible posts early on. It's very wordy and some of it a bit loopy but there is a lot of convincing stuff there too.

"The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism"

Did any of you know that a Secret Service Agent died in WTC7? He wasn't supposed to be there - the building had been evacuated long before. What was he doing there, hmmmm? Fiddling with explosives perhaps?

Socci · 02/01/2007 00:06

Message withdrawn

Tinker · 02/01/2007 00:10

lol at Fiddling with explosives perhaps?

If he wasn't supposed to be there how do we know he was there?

JanH · 02/01/2007 00:32

His body was found and he was awarded a posthumous medal, for bravery or something - I will try to find the page again.

JanH · 02/01/2007 00:38
JanH · 02/01/2007 00:49

This wording is interesting, from the Congressional Record (Apr 23 2002):

It definitely says he lost his life when "the building", ie WTC 7, collapsed; but also "he went back into the towers to help the wounded". But "the towers" collapsed about 11am, and 7 after 5pm...

Papillon · 02/01/2007 08:49

I am sorry this thread upsets some people, but consider this, that is also frustrating to have to keep quiet because you will offend someone who has emotional grief / loss because of 9/11. I am very interested to discuss 9/11 and surrounding events - not a goulish manner, but because America conduct increasingly demands that the general public investigates and questions "Who is orchestrating attacks and wars" and "Why". I would like to address that more, but need to post this as my lurking ds is inclined to wipe what I have just written.

That last link was most interesting Jan ...saying that physics simply does not support WTC7 collapse and about the SAS officer...

ludaloo · 02/01/2007 09:03

As I sat up reading all about and discussing it with DH (for the third night on the trot!!!!) I was also quite worried about what Bush was doing on the morning of 9/11.
As the first plane struck, he was in a school..speaking to children. He was not alerted of the plane until the second plane had hit.
He was sat infront of a group of children, reading them a story!...an official came into the classroom...bent over to tell Bush and then the official left the room.
Bush sat for a further 7 minutes in that room, waved goodbye to the children and then left himself.

Its very strange to me! The President of the US was not escorted out... not taken immediately away for any reason..i.e his own safety. I don't think he would of been able to of continued to read for 7 minutes after receiving the news if he had just heard his city was under attack.....would he????

ludaloo · 02/01/2007 09:04

sorry...that should of read..he was not alerted of the attack....

Aloha · 02/01/2007 09:16

There is evidence that WT7 was damaged pretty extensively by fire and falling debris

here, with pictures

People go back into burning buildings for all sorts of reasons.

Aloha · 02/01/2007 09:18

ludaloo...doesn't what you describe strike right at the heart of this IMO utterly ludicrous conspiracy theory? He clearly had NO IDEA what was going on. THe whole administration went into panic and didn't know what to do. It was a huge surprise.

ludaloo · 02/01/2007 09:23

The more I look into this the more I get very worried....I have seen very convincing evidence to suggest the buildings could of been demolished...it is far more convincing than what we are lead to believe.

Tower 2......hit by a plane around the 70th floor...near to the top of the building.
Burned for 30 minutes....just 30 minutes...before the entire building collapsed. It didn't just fall over, it actually flattened...it fell into itself.
The top half of the building burned....not the bottom half...yet the whole building dissapeared.
If you look at the pictures you can clearly see Steel Girders poking out from the rubble...these girders are sliced in half! They are sliced...you can see the top of the girder...it isn't bent or melted it is sliced. The explosive they claim could of been used is designed to do exactly this to metal girders. It is designed to blow the girders apart so that the building falls neatly inside itself.

Then the speed at which it was all cleared away is also really worrying me. Steel and metal was shipped to China THE NEXT DAY!!!!!! It was sent to China to be recycled. In any kind of crime scene the evidence needs to be left to be investigated for longer than a day!!!! It was all taken away..or buried very very quickly.
There are projects where whole planes have tried to be rebuilt to find out the cause of a crash. Parts of planes salvaged and kept and then reconstructed to find out what happened. Out of 4 planes that were supposed to of crashed not one piece was kept for investigation.

And then flight 93....it crashed into a field...not one piece of plane was recovered! It was a hole filled with metal...not a wing, not a huge piece of plane...nothing. This plane was then reported to of been seen landing somewhere else by a television broadcast company....who documented the plane landing near a NASA base later that day.

Its all so very scary......

ludaloo · 02/01/2007 09:29

Aloha...I really can see your point...but we are talking about the US Government...they are trained to deal with this sort of thing...they have protocols to foolow when something like this occurs. If their president is in any danger then they HAVE to do something about it...not let him finish his story!!!! For all they knew terrorists might of been heading for him next!

I really can see your point...and indeed all the sound level headed points people are posting in defense but we really are being expected to brush a lot under the carpet.

uwila · 02/01/2007 09:31

I don't think it would have been wise for our leader to panic and be urgently escorted out of the school. That would probably set off mass hysteria. I believe that when Bush left that school he went up in Airforce 1 because it was deemed the safest place for him.

I do think he was told about the events when he was at that school probably not many details but I would imagine he was told something like a plane had struck and he had 5 minutes to conclude his schooll vist or something like that.

America was certainly taken by suprise on September 11. And Bush is no exception. Nor Clinton, nor any of his other predecessors.

This idea that Sept. 11 was fabricated is utter and complete nonsense.

Papillon · 02/01/2007 09:32

They pulled the firefighters back - why did a lone SAS man go IN?? Seems abit weird.

Whatever his "reason"

ludaloo - that is why the photo of Bush was cirulated on email of him holidng the book upside down - illiterate as well as dumb struck!

NotQuiteCockney · 02/01/2007 09:33

The other strong point I have against the conspiracy argument is this: if the US gov't is really this evil, all-powerful, and organised, how on earth is the truth about their conspiracies getting out? Surely if they are happy to kill thousands of civilians to advance their cause, they'd bump off a book author or two (covering it up, obviously), to keep the truth of their evil plot getting out?

ludaloo · 02/01/2007 09:36

NQC...if they did that...how suss would that look!!!!!

Aloha · 02/01/2007 09:36

It is only really scary if you only read conspiracy websites, which are designed to be scary. The last pieces of steel from the WTC site were removed in May 2002. That's not really such a rush, is it?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread