Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

investigate 9/11

1000 replies

BeetrootsResolution · 30/12/2006 12:39

My uncle sent me this and thought it was an appropriate time to share it with you

The Truth?

OP posts:
ludaloosDH · 31/12/2006 15:42

Whats your point there??????

WTC 7 collapses at too greater speed...like it has nothing supporting it from the bottom!
Buildings don't just flatten like that...they are thoughtfully constructed structures! Designed to be strong and safe...WTC7 wasn't even hit by a plane! Did the towers fall like this??? No..and they were hit!

ludaloosDH · 31/12/2006 15:44

I mean laws of physics would not allow this to happen unless it was demolished in this way....

JanH · 31/12/2006 15:45

Yes, sorry, I was looking at the pdf of commission evidence!

RubberDuckInLeftoverCurry · 31/12/2006 15:46

Lol...

(changed my name to be more seasonal)

Sobernow · 31/12/2006 15:48

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

PartridgeinaRustyBearTree · 31/12/2006 15:51

As far as I can see no-one knows what damage WTC7 had sustained, so I can't see why it couldn't have collapsed in this way 'unless it ws a controlled demolition'

ludaloosDH · 31/12/2006 16:01

wtc7

ludaloosDH · 31/12/2006 16:10

well thanks for the interesting debate ladies! Its nice to be able to get my point across without being told I'm a "towel head" or a "wanker" as you do on most male orientated chat forums!!

I'll let my dear ludaloo have her name back!

Bye All

p.s...JanH.....we will be the first to grin a huge grin when it all gets proven

JoolsToo · 31/12/2006 16:19

Jan just got through your link of 15:26 and it makes compelling reading.

However, I don't quite understand what he is implying with regard to plane sizes? Surely any nerdy plane spotter watching the film of the planes approaching the towers would have spotted if they weren't the model they were supposed to be?

JoolsToo · 31/12/2006 16:22

Oh ludaloosdh - You don't seriously think the case would ever be proved do you?

God, imagine the fall out!

QuootiepieTheNewYearsAss · 31/12/2006 16:30

Crazy to think we will never know what really happened.

PartridgeinaRustyBearTree · 31/12/2006 16:50

Who is Jim Hoffman? And why should I believe waht he happens to put on his website. Saying that something can't happen because it has never happened before is a little naive......

ruty · 31/12/2006 18:57

i did find the link to the BBC article about some of the hijackers being apparently alive and well very interesting. It strikes me as very odd this hasn't been taken up as a bigger news story if it is true.

christie1 · 31/12/2006 20:39

OMG, you are scaring me. Are you for real? I have to rethink my membership in mumsnet if theis is the level of debate. My god.

JoolsToo · 31/12/2006 20:42

what's up chuck?

cyrilsquirrel · 31/12/2006 21:26

what's the problem? People are free to debate what they want to here, aren't they?

if it doesn't interest you, don't read it!

pantomimEdam · 31/12/2006 21:35

I agree with Christie, it's scary to see so many apparently reasonable people taking this rubbish seriously. I would imagine these sort of ill-informed rumours are very hurtful to the bereaved. The only person on here who has more than a nodding acquaintance with the laws of physics has pointed out that the towers collapsed because someone flew planes into them.

Sobernow · 31/12/2006 21:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JanH · 31/12/2006 21:48

Actually, sobernow, some of us are disputing that the planes were responsible for the collapses.

QuootiepieTheNewYearsAss · 31/12/2006 21:55

You can't ignore hard evidence. How did WTC7 collapse then, if not demolished?

Sobernow · 31/12/2006 22:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Sobernow · 31/12/2006 22:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JanH · 31/12/2006 22:12

True, true, the conspiracy possibilities are almost endless

sandcastles · 31/12/2006 22:31

Fair enough Sobernow, but you also said that he discussed it at the time with some other person at the time.....

Just sounded odd to me.

TwoIfBySea · 31/12/2006 22:34

So this is still going then. Would be more involved but JanH is saying all I would say and more so, and with links!

I can't believe people are coming onto this thread to deliberately upset themselves! FFS this is how these things go uninvestigated, you don't like the thread you stay off it.

Debate is necessary, debate is needed and with so many oddities about 9/11 why shouldn't people be allowed to discuss it. I would hate for m'net to go all namby pamby. I have sent a link of this thread to a couple of my friends who are also interested in this.

It isn't morbid it is curiousity though. Just so many weird things, too many, too many.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.