It IS patriarchal.
The whole notion of consummation is for the man's benefit, not the woman's. So that if the woman gets pregnant, he's likely to be the father.
Why the heck does it need to be there in this day and age for heaven's sake.
Haven't you asked yourself that?
Whether you like it or not, marriage is about conferring rights to people who are likely to have children. I said likely, not will. And no I don't want to stop people who won't or can't have children marrying at all, only pointing out that's the only reason to acknowledge it.
Why on earth should society afford these rights otherwise? Who gives a shit about the love lives of two consenting adults?
Yes, yes I know not all couples will have children. So no comebacks on that, please.
I've never known anybody discuss annulment if not consummated either, but there you go.
It's not the fact that you don't wish to be known as 'Mrs' either.
It's what I perceive to be your over the top reaction to it. Why not just politely correct people?
Starting a thread about it, giving off the vibe that it is truly awful and everybody who assumes you're 'Mrs' is an idiot.
When in fact it's a reasonable assumption to make and easily remedied by using a few words along the lines of,
'I prefer to be known as Ms or Miss, or please.' and not giving it a second thought.