Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be sick to death of Andy Burnham already

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 17/07/2026 20:57

I'm sick to death already of seeing Andy Burnham and hearing his voice. And he isnt even PM yet. Come back Keir Starmer. All is forgiven. I dont know how I'm going to suffer 3 or four more years of him in charge. Playing the part of the working class hero who is going to save the country. Give me strength.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
DuncinToffee · 18/07/2026 12:41

And then we looked at the record breaking temperatures, the many resulting deaths and we wondered why the protests against net zero policies.

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 12:42

Thedogscollar · 18/07/2026 12:27

So as I thought just a sneering post from you on someone with a regional accent.
How sad an adult has to stoop so low.

He probably wouldn't care for my accent either. So what.

MagdaLenor · 18/07/2026 12:44

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 12:42

He probably wouldn't care for my accent either. So what.

I've never seen it reported that he comments negatively on other people's accents.

TemperanceWest · 18/07/2026 12:45

EasternStandard · 18/07/2026 12:41

Why though? What’s the point, you then get annoyed that I respond or ‘last word’. Just avoid if you don’t want that.

You don't annoy me. I enjoy our exchanges. They are all part of the fun of MN☺️

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 12:45

MagdaLenor · 18/07/2026 12:44

I've never seen it reported that he comments negatively on other people's accents.

Do you take everything so literally.

EasternStandard · 18/07/2026 12:47

TemperanceWest · 18/07/2026 12:45

You don't annoy me. I enjoy our exchanges. They are all part of the fun of MN☺️

Ok if you say so. I’ll leave you on that though.

MagdaLenor · 18/07/2026 12:50

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 12:45

Do you take everything so literally.

Better than wild and improbable accusations.

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 12:55

MagdaLenor · 18/07/2026 12:50

Better than wild and improbable accusations.

Wild 😆 🤣

Swiftie1878 · 18/07/2026 12:56

JudeMyHero · 18/07/2026 12:27

Yes but for labour ,he needs to look at why they have been unpalatable since Blair /brown surely ? They were in power for a decade weren't they ? Plenty of time to get change in and improve lives so what happened in Blair and brown tenure that causes labour to be out in the wilderness ...surely that's the period he should be looking at ?

A good starting point would be brown to Gillian Duffy / biggot. Thornberry and her white van man at the same time as white van man was buried under a sea of cheaper eastern European work putting him out of business etc.

What did Labour do for all those areas he spoke of when they were in power ?
Why did they turn from labour to farage ? And Tory ? That's the time period he should be drilling down into.

This is why I don't trust him or them.

I think what did for Labour was an illegal war in Iraq (Blair) followed by the banking crisis of 2008 (Brown). Not their policies per se.

Their subsequent dalliance with Corbyn and all the antisemitism that accompanied that kept them out even longer than they would have been otherwise.

Andy Burnham is very apart from any of that.

MagdaLenor · 18/07/2026 12:57

Swiftie1878 · 18/07/2026 12:56

I think what did for Labour was an illegal war in Iraq (Blair) followed by the banking crisis of 2008 (Brown). Not their policies per se.

Their subsequent dalliance with Corbyn and all the antisemitism that accompanied that kept them out even longer than they would have been otherwise.

Andy Burnham is very apart from any of that.

Good points. The Corbyn era was a horror, imo. I'm glad Starmer acted against that, and antisemitism in the party. Shocking.

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:01

Swiftie1878 · 18/07/2026 12:56

I think what did for Labour was an illegal war in Iraq (Blair) followed by the banking crisis of 2008 (Brown). Not their policies per se.

Their subsequent dalliance with Corbyn and all the antisemitism that accompanied that kept them out even longer than they would have been otherwise.

Andy Burnham is very apart from any of that.

Andy Burnham is very apart from any of that.

No he 100% went with the votes for the Iraq war.

Metalmotha · 18/07/2026 13:02

Think I’m just going to take my tent and back pack round Dartmoor for a few years
(prob be covered in mliions of new houses by then)

Gloriia · 18/07/2026 13:03

'Once again for those at the back. None of the top team in 1997, 2010 or 2024 had any Cabinet experience'

What?! We are talking about a massive and sudden promotion from heading up local councils to being Prime Minster. Not 'top teams'.

Tony Blair at least was present in the commons 'Blair's immediate role before becoming Prime Minister was Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition, positions he held from July 1994 until May 1997'

Cameron, leader of the opposite 2005 until his PM post in 2010 and years of being an MP prior.

No idea why you're sneering about those 'at the back'. Slimy Andy has snuck in the back door with no recent relavant experience as an MP. We all know it.

BermudaRhombus · 18/07/2026 13:03

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:01

Andy Burnham is very apart from any of that.

No he 100% went with the votes for the Iraq war.

He was a key figure in the Blair / Brown project and then served in Corbyn’s shadow cabinet. People’s memories are very short (which is probably a good thing for Burnham)

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:08

BermudaRhombus · 18/07/2026 13:03

He was a key figure in the Blair / Brown project and then served in Corbyn’s shadow cabinet. People’s memories are very short (which is probably a good thing for Burnham)

What I was surprised at is that he praised Kinnock as his inspiration?

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 13:09

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:08

What I was surprised at is that he praised Kinnock as his inspiration?

Oh God it gets worse.

Gloriia · 18/07/2026 13:10

BermudaRhombus · 18/07/2026 13:03

He was a key figure in the Blair / Brown project and then served in Corbyn’s shadow cabinet. People’s memories are very short (which is probably a good thing for Burnham)

Is Corbyn still around, might he dust him down and wheel him out Grin

JudeMyHero · 18/07/2026 13:10

Swiftie1878 · 18/07/2026 12:56

I think what did for Labour was an illegal war in Iraq (Blair) followed by the banking crisis of 2008 (Brown). Not their policies per se.

Their subsequent dalliance with Corbyn and all the antisemitism that accompanied that kept them out even longer than they would have been otherwise.

Andy Burnham is very apart from any of that.

Their "policies " or lack of them laid the groundwork for Brexit.

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:11

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 13:09

Oh God it gets worse.

Well, they're not allowed to play "Things can only get better" any more!

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 13:11

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:11

Well, they're not allowed to play "Things can only get better" any more!

😆 🤣

BermudaRhombus · 18/07/2026 13:14

Gloriia · 18/07/2026 13:03

'Once again for those at the back. None of the top team in 1997, 2010 or 2024 had any Cabinet experience'

What?! We are talking about a massive and sudden promotion from heading up local councils to being Prime Minster. Not 'top teams'.

Tony Blair at least was present in the commons 'Blair's immediate role before becoming Prime Minister was Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition, positions he held from July 1994 until May 1997'

Cameron, leader of the opposite 2005 until his PM post in 2010 and years of being an MP prior.

No idea why you're sneering about those 'at the back'. Slimy Andy has snuck in the back door with no recent relavant experience as an MP. We all know it.

It is no secret that he has wanted to be PM for decades. He was repeatedly rejected by the Labour membership and so he plotted and schemed and backstabbed to get there. Manchester was just a stepping stone and he abandoned his job as mayor as soon as the opportunity to grab power arose. He always looked out of his depth in cabinet positions and was certainly promoted well beyond his abilities. Shame on the spineless Labour MPs for ushering him - the Labour membership, let alone the general public, deserved better.

Gloriia · 18/07/2026 13:17

I don't understand why they didn't just put a fake contest on, like the by election?

Make if at least look like a fair and correct process had been followed not jut a shoo in for King Andy of The North. I'd be embarrassed if I were him.

LuckyHazelFox · 18/07/2026 13:20

BermudaRhombus · 18/07/2026 13:14

It is no secret that he has wanted to be PM for decades. He was repeatedly rejected by the Labour membership and so he plotted and schemed and backstabbed to get there. Manchester was just a stepping stone and he abandoned his job as mayor as soon as the opportunity to grab power arose. He always looked out of his depth in cabinet positions and was certainly promoted well beyond his abilities. Shame on the spineless Labour MPs for ushering him - the Labour membership, let alone the general public, deserved better.

It's a far cry with how long it took Thatcher to get her seat in Finchley. I agree with @Gloriia something is very wrong here. Yes, times change but why always in favour of men?

BrandiedAromatics · 18/07/2026 13:20

Gloriia · 18/07/2026 13:17

I don't understand why they didn't just put a fake contest on, like the by election?

Make if at least look like a fair and correct process had been followed not jut a shoo in for King Andy of The North. I'd be embarrassed if I were him.

I think the driving force has been that many of the PLP think they should get a good job in the new administration. The facts are there are not going to be enough roles to go around. The opposite of the Tories where we don't even know who some of the shadow ministers are.

DuncinToffee · 18/07/2026 13:21

BermudaRhombus · 18/07/2026 11:30

Which is completely contrary to the manifesto commitment. Therein we see the problem. The government has argued vociferously against more drilling for the last couple of years and it’s a position supported by the members who voted on the policies in the manifesto and the public at the last election.

The article states that Burnham is expected to uphold the manifesto commitment not to issue new licences but to honour existing ones.

So if it’s Rosebank & Jackdaw, that would not be a manifesto breach, as they were approved in 2022/23

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.