Twenty witness testimonies doesn't mean twenty reliable witness testimonies, especially when there is a band-wagon to jump on.
I think I could deal with around ten of the testimonies/witnesses - pointing out inconsistences, hearsay and exaggeration. Also looking at their social media posts. Several witnesses have displayed an extreme anti-Brexit/anti-Reform stance on social media - despite claiming in signed letters and interviews that they are not politically motived. I've just spotted one of the witnesses posting on a Stop Reform Facebook Group this week.
A defence team employing private investigators could do much more than me. Then you've got the five or six named witnesses who say Farage was not racist at school, one of whom is Jewish, another with Asian heritage.
One of the 'star witnesses' (an alleged victim) is Yinka Bankole. I know I have posted about him before but I have just this minute thought of something else.
Bankole claims that Farage racially abused him on several occasions when he was aged 9 or 10. Farage would have been aged 16 at the time - in contrast to Bankole's original claim that Farage was 18. Bankole only attended the school for one year, he didn't know his abuser's name at the time, described his abuser as 'very tall' and says he recognised Farage from his walk;
"I recognise his walk every time I see it on TV as that same walk that used to approach me."
However, it has just occurred to me that Farage was seriously injured in several major accidents - struck by a car when he was aged 21 and involved in a plane crash. Sure enough, I've just checked, Farage almost lost his left leg in the car accident, spent two months in hospital with his leg in traction, and almost a year with his leg in a plaster cast.
If Farage has a distinctive walk, then surely this is due to the accident/s he had - not a walk he had as a schoolboy. If I were Farage's defence lawyer, I would suggest to Mr Bankole that he has misidentified my client.