Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Bonnie blue risky sexual behaviour whilst pregnant

372 replies

Jellysweets13 · Yesterday 17:22

If you’re not interested in discussing this then feel free to scroll on by.

A lot of us will know who Bonnie Blue is. The porn star who slept with 1000 men and various other stunts. Loves to rage bait especially to women.

She’s now pregnant, probably around 4-6 months.

If she’s to be believed she’s still working and filming and her latest stunt was to hold a baby shower in which she invited strangers to urinate over her and then have sex with her.

Obviously this has created a lot of outrage and disgust and there are comments everywhere online saying that she is not only sexualising her baby but that social services should be involved.

I’m not completely convinced that she actually doing these things for real. She has an X page showing clips, but it could all be fake or AI.

But let’s say for a moment that she really is having sex with strangers and letting them urinate on her. Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved?

I’m very much usually of the opinion of women having autonomy and choice, but it seems like very risky behaviour and the child is going to have to endure a lot of negative comments and attention because of the choices the mother is making. She doesn’t need to do these things whilst pregnant she is a millionaire.

Yabu - her body her choice
Yanbu - it’s a social services case

OP posts:
SassyGreyGuide · Yesterday 23:13

Fake

30dayss · Yesterday 23:19

1dayatatime · Yesterday 23:10

Clearly BB is in the business of "click bait rage" and OP I think you are right that she targets women in this respect "I'm having sex with your husbands etc etc".

She is clearly using the whole (normally) natural act of having a baby used a means to generate further click bait rage. Starting with having unprotected sex with multiple men to get pregnant .

She then tries to up the shock factor of having multiple men pee on her baby belly.

Lastly she then has sex with multiple men whilst pregnant.

Committed as I am to women's bodily rights on topics such as abortion etc, I ultimately have to say her body her choice.

If another random woman that happened to be into golden showers chose to continue this kink into her pregnancy then although many would find it grim, ultimately it is her choice.
I think what is different here is that BB is seeking to monetise that shock factor.

Equally if a random pregnant woman chose to have multiple sexual partners whilst pregnant then again it is her choice.

As a side note, once read that in Georgian times before contraception, promiscuity amongst pregnant women, particularly amongst upper classes was quite a thing, on the basis that she had completed her duty of producing an heir, couldn't get pregnant twice from her lovers and wanted her "fun" before the responsibilities of motherhood.

I'm kind of supporting the Georgian ladies with this. They wpuld have been so restricted and had very little choice of who they married and their lives that it seems fair they got a bit of fun while they could.

CoffeeAndCats3 · Yesterday 23:21

I hate to think what she would dream up to do with the baby for views 😟
The child should be removed from her at birth.

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 23:25

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · Yesterday 22:33

I cannot read this enough times. £2m per month was being made by a woman who having sex with must be like chucking a sausage down a corridor... 😬😳 Good grief....

You MUST be a man. Like chucking a sausage down a corridor? Have we REALLY not yet retired the slut-shaming and misogynistic myth that the more sex a woman has, the looser her vagina? And that by extension, the less sex a woman has, the more desirable she is, making virgins the most desirable of all?

There aren't enough vomit emojis for what you said, but I'll give it a go:

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

Women's anatomy does NOT get looser according to the number of sex partners. OK?

Do better.

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · Yesterday 23:33

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 23:25

You MUST be a man. Like chucking a sausage down a corridor? Have we REALLY not yet retired the slut-shaming and misogynistic myth that the more sex a woman has, the looser her vagina? And that by extension, the less sex a woman has, the more desirable she is, making virgins the most desirable of all?

There aren't enough vomit emojis for what you said, but I'll give it a go:

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

Women's anatomy does NOT get looser according to the number of sex partners. OK?

Do better.

All right. Blimey. Keep your hair skirt on.

God, you can't say anything on MN without soneone getting upset.

I never said that, nor implied that "purer" women had less sex, so were more desirable. Not everything anyone says has to have connotations and implicit meaning.😒🙄

SherbetDipDap · Yesterday 23:35

CoffeeAndCats3 · Yesterday 23:21

I hate to think what she would dream up to do with the baby for views 😟
The child should be removed from her at birth.

Edited

You can’t remover a baby on hypotheticals though.

ThePieceHall · Yesterday 23:39

SherbetDipDap · Yesterday 23:35

You can’t remover a baby on hypotheticals though.

Yes, children do get removed on ‘hypotheticals’. It’s called risk of future harm, be it emotional or physical. Obviously, no one has a crystal ball. Both of my adopted children were removed at birth on the basis of the risk of harm.

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 23:40

SassyGreyGuide · Yesterday 23:13

Fake

I thought it must be fake because the authorities would be onto her and she wouldn't risk it. But today I found out that doing her stunt while pregnant is totally legal no matter how much it harms the baby, if it does. So now I'm no longer sure that it's a hoax.

DelphinoPlaza · Yesterday 23:46

ThePieceHall · Yesterday 23:39

Yes, children do get removed on ‘hypotheticals’. It’s called risk of future harm, be it emotional or physical. Obviously, no one has a crystal ball. Both of my adopted children were removed at birth on the basis of the risk of harm.

Although she does have loose morals, it has definitely not crossed that threshold yet. She’s have to actually state she wanted to do something like that

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 23:47

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · Yesterday 23:33

All right. Blimey. Keep your hair skirt on.

God, you can't say anything on MN without soneone getting upset.

I never said that, nor implied that "purer" women had less sex, so were more desirable. Not everything anyone says has to have connotations and implicit meaning.😒🙄

Edited

Logically, that's what you said.

If lots of sex = loose vag = worse sex, then logically:

Not much sex = tight vag = better sex.

And if the above two lines are true, then virgins must be the best sex.

THAT IS WHY WHAT YOU SAID IS SO MISOGYNISTIC. And I will not keep my hair on. You ARE a man, aren't you? Coming on here and saying such stuff to a bunch of women. Your response was typically male.🤮

That false thing about women who have lots of sex having loose vaginas needs to die. NOW. How old are you - fourteen? 😡

NameChangeMay2026 · Yesterday 23:50

30dayss · Yesterday 23:19

I'm kind of supporting the Georgian ladies with this. They wpuld have been so restricted and had very little choice of who they married and their lives that it seems fair they got a bit of fun while they could.

I agree.

Except there was a lot of syphilis back then. 😱

ClairDeLaLune · Today 00:06

She was also planning for her baby shower eating baby food with bodily fluids mixed in. She is grim beyond belief.

TheTealHiker · Today 00:07

I call BS on this one.

Sometime ago she said that she had been told that the only way she could get pregnant was by IVF and this was what caused her marriage to break down.

Then she had a fake pregnancy for "clicks".

Now she claims she's pregnant again. Really?

🙄

SonK · Today 00:09

RoseField1 · Yesterday 19:49

Why though? I'm being devil's advocate and thinking it through professionally. What emotional harm, other than growing up the child of a famous porn actor will this baby experience as a result of its mother's sexual behaviour?

I would kill myself if I was that child... just from all the bullying I would get - especially during the teen years where kids are brutal.

Roaroutthetree · Today 00:14

SonK · Today 00:09

I would kill myself if I was that child... just from all the bullying I would get - especially during the teen years where kids are brutal.

This is an unacceptable statement. People don’t just ‘kill themselves’ because of others. People kill themselves because they’re suffering severe mental illness

Roaroutthetree · Today 00:15

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · Yesterday 23:33

All right. Blimey. Keep your hair skirt on.

God, you can't say anything on MN without soneone getting upset.

I never said that, nor implied that "purer" women had less sex, so were more desirable. Not everything anyone says has to have connotations and implicit meaning.😒🙄

Edited

No, this poster was right. You’re revolting to state that women who have a lot of sex have a loose vagina. Revolting and ill educated

VivienneDelacroix · Today 00:21

Of course she's putting the baby at risk. Not only that, but she's festishising her unborn child - she full well knows that some men will be engaging in this latest stunt precisely because she is pregnant. I can't see how she wouldn't be referred to social services by her midwife, she's seeking out risky sexual behaviours whilst pregnant which is a known risk and could affect the baby long-term.

Roaroutthetree · Today 00:23

VivienneDelacroix · Today 00:21

Of course she's putting the baby at risk. Not only that, but she's festishising her unborn child - she full well knows that some men will be engaging in this latest stunt precisely because she is pregnant. I can't see how she wouldn't be referred to social services by her midwife, she's seeking out risky sexual behaviours whilst pregnant which is a known risk and could affect the baby long-term.

How is baby (foetus) at risk? Explain pls

Jollyhockeystickss · Today 00:31

MferMonsterSearchingForRedemption · Yesterday 18:34

I find Bonnie fascinating. I think she is a sociopath. The men who take part, well, they are scum.

She did a Podcast with Louise Perry (Maiden Mother Matriarch) which was interesting.

I don't know if SS should be involved at this stage or not. Yes, she is putting the baby at some risk, but women can do what they want with their bodies. Women smoke in pregnancy, eat high risk foods etc, drink alcohol.

I can see them needing to be involved when the baby is born though if she keeps going on like this.

Yes she is a sociapath her wiring is mis fired which at the moment makes me feel she wont bond with the baby and will only see it as an object....any women whos been pregnant will tell you you dont want any man near you you just want to protect that bump....she just wants to make money, she doesnt see the baby as a person, it will be VB and whatever his name is saying you ruined my childhood,

LBFseBrom · Today 00:36

Jellysweets13 · Yesterday 17:32

But could the baby be at risk if she’s having unprotected sex with strangers? Also letting them pee on her.

Surely there is a high risk of STIs.

I would think they all use condoms, Jelly. She surely wouldn't want to risk catching something.

Jollyhockeystickss · Today 00:37

Frequency · Yesterday 22:13

I'm uncomfortable with the idea that we should be able to remove babies at birth because of a woman's sexual activity.

Where do we draw the line? Can an escort working to put food on the table to keep her child? What about a trafficked woman who is unable to prove she was trafficked?

It is a dangerous precedent to set.

As I said, I don't like what Bonnie Blue does. I believe she is a very damaged individual, and I wish the press and the men involved would stop enabling her, but no-one bar those who know her personally knows what she is like behind closed doors or whether she is capable of raising a child. Bonnie Blue is clearly a persona created for shock value to further monetize her self-harm.

Can you image being 13 and learning about sex and finding out a few months before you were conceived your mother slept with 1000 men in one go, not damaged for life at all and finding out whilst you were in her womb she wanted men to piss on her.....seriously as a child you would be damaged for life, she has zero empathy how she will mother a child god only knows

LBFseBrom · Today 00:39

Perhaps she intends to give up all the porn business when she becomes a mother. She can change her name and it's easy to make yourself look different.
We'll never know if she does and I hope we don't hear any more of her. However I do get it's almost addictive behaviour for her. Only time will tell.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page