Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil

199 replies

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:33

Teacher who sexually abused pupil jailed for two years

Not a trans person.
Not a drag queen.

And she only got TWO years.

My AIBU?

I WOULDN'T be unreasonable to think if this WAS a trans person or a drag queen, there would be endless screeching calling to ban ALL trans people or drag queens from schools.

But it's not.

Two years. That's all she got.

Judith Evans appeared at Belfast Crown Court on Friday

Published
14 March 2025

A teacher who sexually abused a teenage pupil has been jailed for two years and been placed on the sex offenders register for life.

Judith Evans, 33, of Elmwood Grove in Newtownabbey, County Antrim, admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a schoolboy.

She was a teacher at Belfast Boys' Model School when the offences occurred.

Speaking after the hearing at Belfast Crown Court on Friday, a senior police officer described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator".

Evans, a mother of two, was sentenced to a total of four years - half of which will be served in custody and half on licence after her release.

She admitted several charges including sexual communication with a child, meeting a child following sexual grooming, sexual activity with a child involving penetration and possessing indecent images of the schoolboy.

The offences were committed between 1 March and 17 May 2024.

Evans also admitted perverting the course of justice between 13 and 27 June 2024, by making a false allegation that she was sexually assaulted by the teenager.

Evans was given a five-year Sexual Offences Prevention Order, banning her from working with children and vulnerable people.

'Explicit videos and images'

Imposing the sentence, the judge said Evans had "groomed this child, who was vulnerable by reason of age and personal circumstances, basking in his adolescent attraction towards her".

The court heard that Evans and the child exchanged thousands of text messages, the majority of which were sexually explicit, and that she sent him explicit videos and images.

They also met outside of school on three occasions and Evans drove them to locations including Black Mountain and Nutt's Corner, where they engaged in sexual activities, including intercourse.

The court heard that Evans's offending began when the child was going through a "hard time" and she began keeping him behind at school when she noticed a change in his demeanour.

The boy opened up to her and Evans gave him her personal phone number and email address, after which they began messaging each other.

The judge said that, from an early stage, the messages were sexual in nature.

'Profound effect on victim'

The boy ran away and threatened to take his own life after his family became aware of the contact from Evans and the police became involved.

Evans was arrested in May 2024 and during a police interview she replied "no comment" to all questions.

When she was interviewed again in June that year, she claimed that the teenager had threatened her and raped her in her car.

She also told police that he would show her a picture of him holding a gun and that his father was in the Ulster Defence Association (UDA), a loyalist paramilitary group.

The judge said "every aspect of that account was false".

"There is no question that the defendant's behaviour and the aftermath of the discovery of these offences has had a profound effect on this young victim and his family," added the judge.

"Teenagers need protection because their immaturity prevents them from appreciating the long-term harm caused by inappropriate sexual activity."

'Selfish desire for attention'

As Evans wept in the dock, the judge said her two children were now being cared for by their father and that she was "struggling to cope with her current circumstances".

The judge added that while Evans had reported a number of traumatic events in her life and had expressed remorse and guilt over the harm she had caused, there was a lack of explanation regarding her offending.

The judge said: "In truth, there is no explanation other than a selfish desire for attention and intimacy, which she considered was lacking in her relationship at that time."

Evans has accepted "she will never teach again", said the judge.

A spokesperson for Belfast Boys' Model School said they recognised "what a difficult and distressing time this has been for the young person".

"We fully understand the impact this has caused throughout the wider school community and would reassure all pupils and staff that the protection, safety and wellbeing of our pupils continues to be our highest priority."

The spokesperson added that the school has "robust safeguarding processes".

'Cold, calculating predator'

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie of the Police Service of Northern Ireland described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator who abused her position of trust by taking advantage of a young boy".

"She preyed on his vulnerabilities and built an inappropriate 'friendship' with the boy before then further grooming him and sexually exploiting him.

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie spoke outside court following the sentencing

"The messages exchanged between her and her underage pupil were highly sexual and nothing short of sickening.

"As a result of the abuse he was subjected to, the victim has suffered greatly with mental health struggles and has shown immense bravery to bring her to justice today."

The senior officer said there was "still a societal stigma surrounding male victims of abuse" and she encouraged anyone who had been abused in a similar way to contact police.

Judith Evans standing in front of a glass door. She is wearing a blue coat, a flowery top and carrying a handbag.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil jailed for two years

The woman admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a teenage schoolboy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjd9vv2nylo

OP posts:
WearyAuldWumman · 15/03/2025 14:34

Obviously, two years is too brief a term.

Chungai · 15/03/2025 14:36

And only banned from working with children for 5 years.

It does seem she got off lightly.

I imagine her life is destroyed though. Relationship with her children, partner, family, friends.

TooBigForMyBoots · 15/03/2025 14:37

I was disgusted she only got 4 years. FFS she claimed the victim raped her. Disgusting woman.🤬

Isittimeformynapyet · 15/03/2025 14:37

Only scanned your op, but Drag Queen???

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Isittimeformynapyet · 15/03/2025 14:37

Only scanned your op, but Drag Queen???

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

OP posts:
pikkumyy77 · 15/03/2025 14:43

Agreed, OP!

whippy1981 · 15/03/2025 14:43

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

Which demographics?

PinkFrogss · 15/03/2025 14:45

I don’t understand what trans or drag queen has got to do with it but yes that sentence is way too short. Although many men get sentences way too short as well, or no sentence at all.

Only 2.7% of rapes reported to the police result in a charge being bought against the rapist.

This case is a symptom of a much larger problem.

RandomMess · 15/03/2025 14:49

Sadly I suspect the sentence is in line with what most other rapists/sexual predators get? It may also be because she’s a mother as it will have a massive detrimental impact in her DC.

Ablondiebutagoody · 15/03/2025 14:49

It's the old "luckiest boy in the World" attitude at play again

TofuFighters · 15/03/2025 14:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Iwishiwasapolarbear · 15/03/2025 14:51

Her sentence is way too short- she’s disgusting.

not sure how trans people or drag queens are relevant in this situation

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:51

You think this woman is a man ? What makes you think this do you not think female teachers can groom children or do you just have a different agenda 🤔

TofuFighters · 15/03/2025 14:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SemperIdem · 15/03/2025 14:52

What a pointless piece of whataboutery you have posted.

Her sentence is too short in my eyes, and will be in many others too. It is what the judge felt appropriate based on the evidence presented to them, however. I can’t fathom why, but there we are.

Nameychangington · 15/03/2025 14:53

'endless screeching'? Nice.

Your point is a bit confusing OP. This sex offender got a too lenient punishment? A woman committed a sex offence therefore transpeople and drag queens should be in schools? It's all very muddled.

MissJoGrant · 15/03/2025 14:53

RandomMess · 15/03/2025 14:49

Sadly I suspect the sentence is in line with what most other rapists/sexual predators get? It may also be because she’s a mother as it will have a massive detrimental impact in her DC.

I have never heard of that being a consideration with a father.

MissJoGrant · 15/03/2025 14:54

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:51

You think this woman is a man ? What makes you think this do you not think female teachers can groom children or do you just have a different agenda 🤔

You've misunderstood the OP.

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:55

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:51

You think this woman is a man ? What makes you think this do you not think female teachers can groom children or do you just have a different agenda 🤔

Oh you don't think she's a man you are talking in bloody riddles and using child abuse and grooming to make a weird twisted point? Have a word with yourself!

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:56

MissJoGrant · 15/03/2025 14:54

You've misunderstood the OP.

Yes it took me a minute I'm an idiot !

Theeyeballsinthesky · 15/03/2025 14:57

I assume that the OP is wheeling out the “women do it too therefore anyone saying TW shouldn’t be around children is a massive bigot” argument

as always it comes back to safeguarding and no sacred castes. No one, man or woman, should be assumed to be automatically safe to be around children. That is supposed to be why we have safeguarding.

PinkFrogss · 15/03/2025 14:58

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:56

Yes it took me a minute I'm an idiot !

You’re not an idiot OP’s post is just nonsensical

ThinWomansBrain · 15/03/2025 14:59

Seems a light sentence but why start harping on about trans people and drag queens when the woman appears to be neither?
Are you suggesting in your OP that all women should be banned from working in schools because one woman sexually abused a pupil? It would really help with the current staffing issues in schools.
Why not reflect on how inappropriate your comments are? (one woman offends, therefore all women are potential sex offenders - its exactly the same principal in making the assumption that if one trans person 6ffends, all trans people must be offenders)

And as for extending your "logic" to drag queens - any other hobbies you'd like to extend it to? Model railway enthusiast, people that like crochet?

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 15/03/2025 14:59

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 14:55

Oh you don't think she's a man you are talking in bloody riddles and using child abuse and grooming to make a weird twisted point? Have a word with yourself!

⬆What she said.

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 15:00

PinkFrogss · 15/03/2025 14:58

You’re not an idiot OP’s post is just nonsensical

Total nonsense !