Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil

199 replies

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:33

Teacher who sexually abused pupil jailed for two years

Not a trans person.
Not a drag queen.

And she only got TWO years.

My AIBU?

I WOULDN'T be unreasonable to think if this WAS a trans person or a drag queen, there would be endless screeching calling to ban ALL trans people or drag queens from schools.

But it's not.

Two years. That's all she got.

Judith Evans appeared at Belfast Crown Court on Friday

Published
14 March 2025

A teacher who sexually abused a teenage pupil has been jailed for two years and been placed on the sex offenders register for life.

Judith Evans, 33, of Elmwood Grove in Newtownabbey, County Antrim, admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a schoolboy.

She was a teacher at Belfast Boys' Model School when the offences occurred.

Speaking after the hearing at Belfast Crown Court on Friday, a senior police officer described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator".

Evans, a mother of two, was sentenced to a total of four years - half of which will be served in custody and half on licence after her release.

She admitted several charges including sexual communication with a child, meeting a child following sexual grooming, sexual activity with a child involving penetration and possessing indecent images of the schoolboy.

The offences were committed between 1 March and 17 May 2024.

Evans also admitted perverting the course of justice between 13 and 27 June 2024, by making a false allegation that she was sexually assaulted by the teenager.

Evans was given a five-year Sexual Offences Prevention Order, banning her from working with children and vulnerable people.

'Explicit videos and images'

Imposing the sentence, the judge said Evans had "groomed this child, who was vulnerable by reason of age and personal circumstances, basking in his adolescent attraction towards her".

The court heard that Evans and the child exchanged thousands of text messages, the majority of which were sexually explicit, and that she sent him explicit videos and images.

They also met outside of school on three occasions and Evans drove them to locations including Black Mountain and Nutt's Corner, where they engaged in sexual activities, including intercourse.

The court heard that Evans's offending began when the child was going through a "hard time" and she began keeping him behind at school when she noticed a change in his demeanour.

The boy opened up to her and Evans gave him her personal phone number and email address, after which they began messaging each other.

The judge said that, from an early stage, the messages were sexual in nature.

'Profound effect on victim'

The boy ran away and threatened to take his own life after his family became aware of the contact from Evans and the police became involved.

Evans was arrested in May 2024 and during a police interview she replied "no comment" to all questions.

When she was interviewed again in June that year, she claimed that the teenager had threatened her and raped her in her car.

She also told police that he would show her a picture of him holding a gun and that his father was in the Ulster Defence Association (UDA), a loyalist paramilitary group.

The judge said "every aspect of that account was false".

"There is no question that the defendant's behaviour and the aftermath of the discovery of these offences has had a profound effect on this young victim and his family," added the judge.

"Teenagers need protection because their immaturity prevents them from appreciating the long-term harm caused by inappropriate sexual activity."

'Selfish desire for attention'

As Evans wept in the dock, the judge said her two children were now being cared for by their father and that she was "struggling to cope with her current circumstances".

The judge added that while Evans had reported a number of traumatic events in her life and had expressed remorse and guilt over the harm she had caused, there was a lack of explanation regarding her offending.

The judge said: "In truth, there is no explanation other than a selfish desire for attention and intimacy, which she considered was lacking in her relationship at that time."

Evans has accepted "she will never teach again", said the judge.

A spokesperson for Belfast Boys' Model School said they recognised "what a difficult and distressing time this has been for the young person".

"We fully understand the impact this has caused throughout the wider school community and would reassure all pupils and staff that the protection, safety and wellbeing of our pupils continues to be our highest priority."

The spokesperson added that the school has "robust safeguarding processes".

'Cold, calculating predator'

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie of the Police Service of Northern Ireland described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator who abused her position of trust by taking advantage of a young boy".

"She preyed on his vulnerabilities and built an inappropriate 'friendship' with the boy before then further grooming him and sexually exploiting him.

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie spoke outside court following the sentencing

"The messages exchanged between her and her underage pupil were highly sexual and nothing short of sickening.

"As a result of the abuse he was subjected to, the victim has suffered greatly with mental health struggles and has shown immense bravery to bring her to justice today."

The senior officer said there was "still a societal stigma surrounding male victims of abuse" and she encouraged anyone who had been abused in a similar way to contact police.

Judith Evans standing in front of a glass door. She is wearing a blue coat, a flowery top and carrying a handbag.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil jailed for two years

The woman admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a teenage schoolboy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjd9vv2nylo

OP posts:
Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:37

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:36

Bullshit and you know it

That’s literally it.

JeremiahBullfrog · 16/03/2025 08:39

If the Scottish bloke "didn't know what he is doing", then not only is he too thick to be in a job that requires constant human interaction, his school must have incredibly poor safeguarding training.

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:40

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:37

That’s literally it.

To clarify Your statement re trans ideology is bullshit

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 08:41

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:32

The fact that y’all think that poster is so very clever says it all.

Your comment shows that you don’t class trans women as women, not really, and that’s because you know they’re men.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:53

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:40

To clarify Your statement re trans ideology is bullshit

To clarify , that’s literally all it is.

The idea that some people are trans and it’s ok to be trans. Thats it.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:55

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 08:41

Your comment shows that you don’t class trans women as women, not really, and that’s because you know they’re men.

No I don’t think (“know”) trans women are men.

Trans women are registered / observed male at birth, however, that does not make them men.

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:56

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:53

To clarify , that’s literally all it is.

The idea that some people are trans and it’s ok to be trans. Thats it.

To clarify no, it really isn't and if that is your only understanding then no wonder you're confused

AnSolas · 16/03/2025 08:57

@Tandora

Lets look at what happened here?

The teacher was in a position of trust.
She was sexually attracted to young boys/ this young boy
People with this sexual attraction are commonly described as being paedophiles but it is currently being rebranded as MAP Minor Attracted Person.
It sounds much nicer and if she is a NOMAP thats Not Offending Minor Attracted Person or someone not actively engaged in child sex abuse that sounds nicer still But she is a OMAP or child sex offender
The people around her trusted her.
She spotted that the boy was having problems at home.
She organised her grooming in the basis of her being concerned for him
She pretends she is doing safe guarding and providing emotional support
She begins offending and would have shamed anyone who objects to her using her free time to "help" a young boy.
She gets caught and tries to play innocent teacher rape victim of violent boy.

How do you suggest that the courts and society as a whole should deal with her as a child sex offender?

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:58

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:56

To clarify no, it really isn't and if that is your only understanding then no wonder you're confused

It really is. No matter how much you continue to insist it’s not.
We can continue to do this all day if you like?

Some people are trans. It’s ok to be trans.

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 08:59

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:55

No I don’t think (“know”) trans women are men.

Trans women are registered / observed male at birth, however, that does not make them men.

Edited

What makes them women? What is a woman?

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:00

AnSolas · 16/03/2025 08:57

@Tandora

Lets look at what happened here?

The teacher was in a position of trust.
She was sexually attracted to young boys/ this young boy
People with this sexual attraction are commonly described as being paedophiles but it is currently being rebranded as MAP Minor Attracted Person.
It sounds much nicer and if she is a NOMAP thats Not Offending Minor Attracted Person or someone not actively engaged in child sex abuse that sounds nicer still But she is a OMAP or child sex offender
The people around her trusted her.
She spotted that the boy was having problems at home.
She organised her grooming in the basis of her being concerned for him
She pretends she is doing safe guarding and providing emotional support
She begins offending and would have shamed anyone who objects to her using her free time to "help" a young boy.
She gets caught and tries to play innocent teacher rape victim of violent boy.

How do you suggest that the courts and society as a whole should deal with her as a child sex offender?

I think what that teacher did was beyond abhorrent, it undoubtedly caused serious and lasting harm to that child , and I think the courts dealt with her appropriately.

maddening · 16/03/2025 09:01

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:58

It really is. No matter how much you continue to insist it’s not.
We can continue to do this all day if you like?

Some people are trans. It’s ok to be trans.

I agree it is absolutely fine to be trans but you are mistaken in respect of the ideology and equally no matter how much you insist you are incorrect

AnSolas · 16/03/2025 09:03

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:00

I think what that teacher did was beyond abhorrent, it undoubtedly caused serious and lasting harm to that child , and I think the courts dealt with her appropriately.

So you think that a teacher who abused her position to sex offend against a child in her care should only get 4 years?

Why such a low tarrif if you think she caused lasting harm to the child?

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:05

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 08:59

What makes them women? What is a woman?

Their gender makes them a woman. A woman is a person with a female gender.

You know there is no point arguing with me about this. You have already closed your mind to what being trans is, what “gender” is. You’ve decided it’s non sensical made up rubbish and nothing I can say to you will persuade you otherwise. So what purpose does this conversation serve? Perhaps you are trying to “catch me out”?

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:06

maddening · 16/03/2025 09:01

I agree it is absolutely fine to be trans but you are mistaken in respect of the ideology and equally no matter how much you insist you are incorrect

I would ask you what you believe the ideology to be but I can’t really be arsed.

All trans people/ trans advocates (as you peops like to call them) want is for the world to accept that some people are trans and it’s ok to be trans.

whippy1981 · 16/03/2025 09:07

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:05

Their gender makes them a woman. A woman is a person with a female gender.

You know there is no point arguing with me about this. You have already closed your mind to what being trans is, what “gender” is. You’ve decided it’s non sensical made up rubbish and nothing I can say to you will persuade you otherwise. So what purpose does this conversation serve? Perhaps you are trying to “catch me out”?

Out of curiosity if gender is all it takes - how can a woman become a trans woman?

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:08

AnSolas · 16/03/2025 09:03

So you think that a teacher who abused her position to sex offend against a child in her care should only get 4 years?

Why such a low tarrif if you think she caused lasting harm to the child?

I think four years is sufficient for the justice system to serve its purpose yes. I’m not really a fan of lengthy prison sentences in general.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:11

whippy1981 · 16/03/2025 09:07

Out of curiosity if gender is all it takes - how can a woman become a trans woman?

Edited

A trans woman is a person who was registered/ observed to be male at birth but who has a female gender. This is unusual.

The overwhelming majority of women are registered/ observed female at birth.

Again- what function does this conversation serve since you are not the least bit interested in my responses other than perhaps to “catch me out”? Are you hoping to demonstrate I’m stupid?

whippy1981 · 16/03/2025 09:12

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:11

A trans woman is a person who was registered/ observed to be male at birth but who has a female gender. This is unusual.

The overwhelming majority of women are registered/ observed female at birth.

Again- what function does this conversation serve since you are not the least bit interested in my responses other than perhaps to “catch me out”? Are you hoping to demonstrate I’m stupid?

It isn't to catch you out. It is for you to explain the transition process from woman to trans woman. You said it was ok for people to be trans so does that include women who want to be trans woman? Or is that not ok?

GeneralPeter · 16/03/2025 09:12

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

Then they should make their case on the evidence.

Clearly not all trans people, but a fair number seem to promote medically-unnecessary mastectomies and castration to children, with, sadly, some takeup. That seems dangerous to me.

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 09:12

@Tandora How can something constructed by society, gender, make someone a woman? It really is nonsense. I genuinely don’t know what to say if you believe this stuff but it is a dangerous ideology.

AnSolas · 16/03/2025 09:13

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:08

I think four years is sufficient for the justice system to serve its purpose yes. I’m not really a fan of lengthy prison sentences in general.

Do you think sexual attraction is a orientation or a preference?

And what purpose do you think the prison system serves?

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 16/03/2025 09:14

but for some absurd reason that word is banned on mumsnet

its not banned at all

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:15

whippy1981 · 16/03/2025 09:12

It isn't to catch you out. It is for you to explain the transition process from woman to trans woman. You said it was ok for people to be trans so does that include women who want to be trans woman? Or is that not ok?

It isn't to catch you out. It is for you to explain the transition process from woman to trans woman.

Oh please. Don’t pretend you are the least bit interested in what the response is.

Your question makes little sense.
Being trans isn’t about what someone wants to be it’s what they are.

A trans woman is a person who was registered/ observed to be male at birth but who has a female gender.

If you are a woman who was registered/ observed female at birth (ans the majority of women are) then you are not trans.

It’s really not very hard to understand if you aren’t so resistant to the idea that some people are trans and that’s ok.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 09:15

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 16/03/2025 09:14

but for some absurd reason that word is banned on mumsnet

its not banned at all

Since when??