Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil

199 replies

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:33

Teacher who sexually abused pupil jailed for two years

Not a trans person.
Not a drag queen.

And she only got TWO years.

My AIBU?

I WOULDN'T be unreasonable to think if this WAS a trans person or a drag queen, there would be endless screeching calling to ban ALL trans people or drag queens from schools.

But it's not.

Two years. That's all she got.

Judith Evans appeared at Belfast Crown Court on Friday

Published
14 March 2025

A teacher who sexually abused a teenage pupil has been jailed for two years and been placed on the sex offenders register for life.

Judith Evans, 33, of Elmwood Grove in Newtownabbey, County Antrim, admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a schoolboy.

She was a teacher at Belfast Boys' Model School when the offences occurred.

Speaking after the hearing at Belfast Crown Court on Friday, a senior police officer described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator".

Evans, a mother of two, was sentenced to a total of four years - half of which will be served in custody and half on licence after her release.

She admitted several charges including sexual communication with a child, meeting a child following sexual grooming, sexual activity with a child involving penetration and possessing indecent images of the schoolboy.

The offences were committed between 1 March and 17 May 2024.

Evans also admitted perverting the course of justice between 13 and 27 June 2024, by making a false allegation that she was sexually assaulted by the teenager.

Evans was given a five-year Sexual Offences Prevention Order, banning her from working with children and vulnerable people.

'Explicit videos and images'

Imposing the sentence, the judge said Evans had "groomed this child, who was vulnerable by reason of age and personal circumstances, basking in his adolescent attraction towards her".

The court heard that Evans and the child exchanged thousands of text messages, the majority of which were sexually explicit, and that she sent him explicit videos and images.

They also met outside of school on three occasions and Evans drove them to locations including Black Mountain and Nutt's Corner, where they engaged in sexual activities, including intercourse.

The court heard that Evans's offending began when the child was going through a "hard time" and she began keeping him behind at school when she noticed a change in his demeanour.

The boy opened up to her and Evans gave him her personal phone number and email address, after which they began messaging each other.

The judge said that, from an early stage, the messages were sexual in nature.

'Profound effect on victim'

The boy ran away and threatened to take his own life after his family became aware of the contact from Evans and the police became involved.

Evans was arrested in May 2024 and during a police interview she replied "no comment" to all questions.

When she was interviewed again in June that year, she claimed that the teenager had threatened her and raped her in her car.

She also told police that he would show her a picture of him holding a gun and that his father was in the Ulster Defence Association (UDA), a loyalist paramilitary group.

The judge said "every aspect of that account was false".

"There is no question that the defendant's behaviour and the aftermath of the discovery of these offences has had a profound effect on this young victim and his family," added the judge.

"Teenagers need protection because their immaturity prevents them from appreciating the long-term harm caused by inappropriate sexual activity."

'Selfish desire for attention'

As Evans wept in the dock, the judge said her two children were now being cared for by their father and that she was "struggling to cope with her current circumstances".

The judge added that while Evans had reported a number of traumatic events in her life and had expressed remorse and guilt over the harm she had caused, there was a lack of explanation regarding her offending.

The judge said: "In truth, there is no explanation other than a selfish desire for attention and intimacy, which she considered was lacking in her relationship at that time."

Evans has accepted "she will never teach again", said the judge.

A spokesperson for Belfast Boys' Model School said they recognised "what a difficult and distressing time this has been for the young person".

"We fully understand the impact this has caused throughout the wider school community and would reassure all pupils and staff that the protection, safety and wellbeing of our pupils continues to be our highest priority."

The spokesperson added that the school has "robust safeguarding processes".

'Cold, calculating predator'

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie of the Police Service of Northern Ireland described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator who abused her position of trust by taking advantage of a young boy".

"She preyed on his vulnerabilities and built an inappropriate 'friendship' with the boy before then further grooming him and sexually exploiting him.

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie spoke outside court following the sentencing

"The messages exchanged between her and her underage pupil were highly sexual and nothing short of sickening.

"As a result of the abuse he was subjected to, the victim has suffered greatly with mental health struggles and has shown immense bravery to bring her to justice today."

The senior officer said there was "still a societal stigma surrounding male victims of abuse" and she encouraged anyone who had been abused in a similar way to contact police.

Judith Evans standing in front of a glass door. She is wearing a blue coat, a flowery top and carrying a handbag.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil jailed for two years

The woman admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a teenage schoolboy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjd9vv2nylo

OP posts:
RawBloomers · 15/03/2025 15:01

Yes, I think the sentence is light. Agree with PP that the 5 year ban on working with children seems perversely short.

But it isn’t out of line with sentencing for sexual offences. In my opinion, the sentencing guidelines don’t take the harm caused by these crimes (both the individual crimes and the climate that the prevalence of them engenders) seriously enough, nor the need to keep people with these attitudes to others off the streets.

MissyB1 · 15/03/2025 15:02

It's an important reminder that boys can be victims of sexual abuse by women, I know it's rarer but we can't automatically assume that women in positions of authority over boys are always to be trusted. I can't stand the assumption that boys are totally up for it so therefore it's OK - I do think some people believe that!

But yes the sentence is an insult 😡

WearyAuldWumman · 15/03/2025 15:03

Ablondiebutagoody · 15/03/2025 14:49

It's the old "luckiest boy in the World" attitude at play again

Yup. There's an old (very inappropriate joke) that plays on this trope. I can't repeat it, but all the way through the boy's father is pleased that the boy is having sex until he realises that the teacher isn't a woman.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 15/03/2025 15:05

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 15:00

Total nonsense !

And what's the point?
"Aibu to think that this prison sentence is a disgrace and far too short?" . Perfectly logical post that we can all read and understand.
Why the need to muddy is with the drag queens palaver.

Coffeeishot · 15/03/2025 15:06

A female teacher groomed a pupil in my dc school about a decade ago, it was a huge deal at the time, she got a minimal jail sentence then conditional bail, people were angry she didn't get a longer sentence, she also tried to blame the boy.

Iknowaboutpopular · 15/03/2025 15:06

No idea why you bought up drag queen's and trans people. Seems you've used this horrendous case of sexual abuse against a boy to make your point. Yuck.

The sentence was way too lenient.

AnSolas · 15/03/2025 15:08

Your post is nasty.

This is a child who was groomed into sexual activity with a adult who he should have been able to trust.

She should have also been charged with making a false rape report with the intent to pervert the course of justice.

And she should imo get a longer prison term.

And if you are going to shit post about child sex abuse get your facts straight she got 4 years 2 of which are to be served in prison.

I am sure that you can write to the CPS and ask for them to appeal the term.

But you did not bother to check that out in rush to post your ra-ra-mens-rights

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/unduly-lenient-sentences

https://www.judiciaryni.uk/sentencing-guidelines-northern-ireland

Sentencing Guidelines for Northern Ireland

Sentencing Guideline PapersDomestic violence and abuse. How can our policing and justice systems help?Presentation by His Honour Judge Burgess, Recorder of Belfast, Presiding County Court Judge at the Journey to Justice conference in Belfast January 20...

https://www.judiciaryni.uk/sentencing-guidelines-northern-ireland

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 15/03/2025 15:10

I must admit I'm especially shocked at the five year ban on working with children. Surely anyone convicted of this kind of thing should be banned for life from working in school/childcare establishments.

DeffoNeedANameChange · 15/03/2025 15:10

Thank you so much for posting this, because I was mistakenly under the impression that all assaults are carried out by drag queens. I now realise that all women should be banned from working with children.

Kahless · 15/03/2025 15:14

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

Again.... Why?

Poppinjay · 15/03/2025 15:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This

spicemaiden · 15/03/2025 15:22

‘Endless screeching’ 🙄🙄🙄

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 15:27

Aaaannd there they are.

I'm a child abuse survivor.

Thank you to those who "get" this. The call is coming from inside the house a lot of the time, but many a time it is claimed otherwise, and wrongly.

Child abuse and rape punishments need to be overhauled and need to be much longer sentences, I would like to see LIFE sentences for them. It is the most heinous crime against our children.

OP posts:
DdraigGoch · 15/03/2025 15:29

MissJoGrant · 15/03/2025 14:53

I have never heard of that being a consideration with a father.

Defence solicitors do often use "he's going to be a father soon" when trying to secure a softer sentence (funnily enough no one ever properly checks the truth of the claim). My view is that kids are usually better off without criminal scumbags in their lives, but apparently such views are unfashionable.

FOJN · 15/03/2025 15:35

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 15/03/2025 15:10

I must admit I'm especially shocked at the five year ban on working with children. Surely anyone convicted of this kind of thing should be banned for life from working in school/childcare establishments.

She's on the sex offenders register for life. Hopefully I'm not being naive in assuming that will show on a DBS (or equivalent) and prevent her from working or volunteering with children forever.

OP the sentence is 4 years (not long enough imo) although she will only serve half in custody.

Not sure what your point is about drag queens and trans people. Women can be sex offenders too? Yes, we know.

RitaFromThePitCanteen · 15/03/2025 15:35

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

Any type of person can potentially be dangerous to be around. Including women. Including trans people and drag queens. That doesn't mean they all are, but people of all demographics can potentially be predators.

Not sure what you're trying to do with this thread, other than use a criminal offence against a child to start some kind of culture war frothing?

AnSolas · 15/03/2025 15:35

MissJoGrant · 15/03/2025 14:53

I have never heard of that being a consideration with a father.

It will be used plus
Previously of good character
Never happened before
Sole caregiver for mother/father/cat
Lost his job
Shame due to local community finding out

WearyAuldWumman · 15/03/2025 15:40

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 15/03/2025 15:10

I must admit I'm especially shocked at the five year ban on working with children. Surely anyone convicted of this kind of thing should be banned for life from working in school/childcare establishments.

This is par for the course and I don't understand why.

GTCS hearing transcripts are now made available to the public and it's shocking the number of times miscreant teachers have only been removed from the teaching register for x number of years instead of permanently. (In practice, no one's going to employ them again, but even so...)

One of our local courts has just found a teacher guilty of inappropriate behaviour. Sentencing is in April.

The idiot judge has said that the teacher didn't offend deliberately? Eh?! He sent pics and videos of himself to girls who had just left school and the local FB has had umpteen comments from other girls who have said that as soon as they left, he sent pics of himself in the bath to them.

ETA He has been placed on the sex offender's register. I've no doubt that the GTCS hearing will take place after the sentencing.

Crocmush · 15/03/2025 15:43

Why would a drag queen belong in a school at all, OP? Obviously there will be trans teachers, but drag queen isn't really a day time activity you take to your other job, is it?
Awful case, and her attempt to cover it up was disgusting.
The biggest risk of being abused in schools will be from other school students, with male staff being next in that line.

PinkFrogss · 15/03/2025 15:54

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 15:27

Aaaannd there they are.

I'm a child abuse survivor.

Thank you to those who "get" this. The call is coming from inside the house a lot of the time, but many a time it is claimed otherwise, and wrongly.

Child abuse and rape punishments need to be overhauled and need to be much longer sentences, I would like to see LIFE sentences for them. It is the most heinous crime against our children.

I’m sorry to hear that OP, but I don’t think anyone is disagreeing with you on that particular point.

commonsense61 · 15/03/2025 15:55

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Nanny0gg · 15/03/2025 16:01

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

Her sentence was too short but I don't understand why you've inserted anything to do with trans or drag in there and I'm as GC as the next person

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 15/03/2025 16:03

WearyAuldWumman · 15/03/2025 15:40

This is par for the course and I don't understand why.

GTCS hearing transcripts are now made available to the public and it's shocking the number of times miscreant teachers have only been removed from the teaching register for x number of years instead of permanently. (In practice, no one's going to employ them again, but even so...)

One of our local courts has just found a teacher guilty of inappropriate behaviour. Sentencing is in April.

The idiot judge has said that the teacher didn't offend deliberately? Eh?! He sent pics and videos of himself to girls who had just left school and the local FB has had umpteen comments from other girls who have said that as soon as they left, he sent pics of himself in the bath to them.

ETA He has been placed on the sex offender's register. I've no doubt that the GTCS hearing will take place after the sentencing.

Edited

Fucking hell!!
That is extremely shocking and you do have to wonder what goes through the head of some of these judges (little bit OT but I remember the case of Jill Saward who was brutally raped in her own home by a group of burglars. At trial the judge gave them all light sentences because he didn't think she had suffered "that much").

I must be more naive than I'd thought because I honestly thought that any CSA conviction or placement on the sex offenders register would be a straight ban from working with kids and vulnerable adults. I mean surely that's just common sense.

Fargo79 · 15/03/2025 16:18

This is such a weird post.

Trying to twist the horrific sexual abuse of a child to somehow promote a completely unrelated TRA agenda is gross for a start.

And then trying (not so skilfully, it has to be said) to position the story about the abused child and the inadequacies of the justice system alongside some ramblings about drag queens in schools, seemingly to try and equate the two so that anyone who might say (or "screech" 🙄) that drag queens and trans ideology don't belong in schools absolutely must therefore think that teachers should be let off unpunished when they sexually assault their pupils.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 15/03/2025 16:21

Indeed @Fargo79 it’s utterly bizzare

Swipe left for the next trending thread