Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil

199 replies

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:33

Teacher who sexually abused pupil jailed for two years

Not a trans person.
Not a drag queen.

And she only got TWO years.

My AIBU?

I WOULDN'T be unreasonable to think if this WAS a trans person or a drag queen, there would be endless screeching calling to ban ALL trans people or drag queens from schools.

But it's not.

Two years. That's all she got.

Judith Evans appeared at Belfast Crown Court on Friday

Published
14 March 2025

A teacher who sexually abused a teenage pupil has been jailed for two years and been placed on the sex offenders register for life.

Judith Evans, 33, of Elmwood Grove in Newtownabbey, County Antrim, admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a schoolboy.

She was a teacher at Belfast Boys' Model School when the offences occurred.

Speaking after the hearing at Belfast Crown Court on Friday, a senior police officer described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator".

Evans, a mother of two, was sentenced to a total of four years - half of which will be served in custody and half on licence after her release.

She admitted several charges including sexual communication with a child, meeting a child following sexual grooming, sexual activity with a child involving penetration and possessing indecent images of the schoolboy.

The offences were committed between 1 March and 17 May 2024.

Evans also admitted perverting the course of justice between 13 and 27 June 2024, by making a false allegation that she was sexually assaulted by the teenager.

Evans was given a five-year Sexual Offences Prevention Order, banning her from working with children and vulnerable people.

'Explicit videos and images'

Imposing the sentence, the judge said Evans had "groomed this child, who was vulnerable by reason of age and personal circumstances, basking in his adolescent attraction towards her".

The court heard that Evans and the child exchanged thousands of text messages, the majority of which were sexually explicit, and that she sent him explicit videos and images.

They also met outside of school on three occasions and Evans drove them to locations including Black Mountain and Nutt's Corner, where they engaged in sexual activities, including intercourse.

The court heard that Evans's offending began when the child was going through a "hard time" and she began keeping him behind at school when she noticed a change in his demeanour.

The boy opened up to her and Evans gave him her personal phone number and email address, after which they began messaging each other.

The judge said that, from an early stage, the messages were sexual in nature.

'Profound effect on victim'

The boy ran away and threatened to take his own life after his family became aware of the contact from Evans and the police became involved.

Evans was arrested in May 2024 and during a police interview she replied "no comment" to all questions.

When she was interviewed again in June that year, she claimed that the teenager had threatened her and raped her in her car.

She also told police that he would show her a picture of him holding a gun and that his father was in the Ulster Defence Association (UDA), a loyalist paramilitary group.

The judge said "every aspect of that account was false".

"There is no question that the defendant's behaviour and the aftermath of the discovery of these offences has had a profound effect on this young victim and his family," added the judge.

"Teenagers need protection because their immaturity prevents them from appreciating the long-term harm caused by inappropriate sexual activity."

'Selfish desire for attention'

As Evans wept in the dock, the judge said her two children were now being cared for by their father and that she was "struggling to cope with her current circumstances".

The judge added that while Evans had reported a number of traumatic events in her life and had expressed remorse and guilt over the harm she had caused, there was a lack of explanation regarding her offending.

The judge said: "In truth, there is no explanation other than a selfish desire for attention and intimacy, which she considered was lacking in her relationship at that time."

Evans has accepted "she will never teach again", said the judge.

A spokesperson for Belfast Boys' Model School said they recognised "what a difficult and distressing time this has been for the young person".

"We fully understand the impact this has caused throughout the wider school community and would reassure all pupils and staff that the protection, safety and wellbeing of our pupils continues to be our highest priority."

The spokesperson added that the school has "robust safeguarding processes".

'Cold, calculating predator'

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie of the Police Service of Northern Ireland described Evans as a "cold, calculating child predator who abused her position of trust by taking advantage of a young boy".

"She preyed on his vulnerabilities and built an inappropriate 'friendship' with the boy before then further grooming him and sexually exploiting him.

Det Ch Insp Jill Duffie spoke outside court following the sentencing

"The messages exchanged between her and her underage pupil were highly sexual and nothing short of sickening.

"As a result of the abuse he was subjected to, the victim has suffered greatly with mental health struggles and has shown immense bravery to bring her to justice today."

The senior officer said there was "still a societal stigma surrounding male victims of abuse" and she encouraged anyone who had been abused in a similar way to contact police.

Judith Evans standing in front of a glass door. She is wearing a blue coat, a flowery top and carrying a handbag.

Judith Evans: Teacher who abused pupil jailed for two years

The woman admitted grooming and having sexual intercourse with a teenage schoolboy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjd9vv2nylo

OP posts:
Isittimeformynapyet · 15/03/2025 19:19

AnSolas · 15/03/2025 19:17

How would the judge investigate?

The defence may submit a letter from a woman who claims that she is going to give birth and the child sex offender is the dad and that he is a nice chap when not engaged in child sex offending.
But its not as if the Judge can order a DNA test

I see your point. Thanks

ladymammalade · 15/03/2025 19:21

A. This woman is a disgusting predator and has received too short a sentence.
B. What’s it got to do with drag queens?

theallotmentqueen · 15/03/2025 19:38

1000%.

DdraigGoch · 15/03/2025 20:11

Isittimeformynapyet · 15/03/2025 19:10

Eh?

My question was: how do you know that male defendant's claims of imminent fatherhood are "never investigated"?

So the defence solicitor wheels (not literally, it's a figure of speech) in the supposed mother-to-be who testifies that she's pregnant with the defendant's child, in the hope that the defendant will get a non-custodial sentence. There is absolutely no mechanism to check nine months later that a) there ever was a pregnancy, b) that he was the father or c) that if he did produce a child that he would have an active part of its upbringing.

MushMonster · 15/03/2025 20:22

4 years is far too short, plus they have gone and already cut it to half?
Also, the order preventing her from working with children is only for 5 years. It should be for life!

Talking about this, I cannot get over Macron and his wife! They met just like this! Now married for years, but she was his teacher, at 15. She had children too.

NotTerfNorCis · 15/03/2025 20:28

Drag queens and transwomen is longhand for males.

The question being asked is, are females judged less harshly than males.

But with a side order of, drag queens and transwomen are a special, persecuted type of male.

Iwishiwasapolarbear · 15/03/2025 20:29

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 15:27

Aaaannd there they are.

I'm a child abuse survivor.

Thank you to those who "get" this. The call is coming from inside the house a lot of the time, but many a time it is claimed otherwise, and wrongly.

Child abuse and rape punishments need to be overhauled and need to be much longer sentences, I would like to see LIFE sentences for them. It is the most heinous crime against our children.

And there who is? Everyone agrees that what this woman did was abhorrent.

you are randomly bringing drag queens into this. It’s not relevant. I find it strange that instead of thinking of the poor boy in this scenario you’ve decided to think about drag queens

Soontobe60 · 15/03/2025 20:32

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

Drag is an adult sexualised performance, as such children should not be involved. That is not the same as saying all men who perform it are sexual predators.

maddening · 15/03/2025 20:42

wretchedmood · 15/03/2025 14:40

Certain demographics think drag queens & trans people are dangerous around children.

No that is not what anyone has said.

Drag acts are adult entertainment and not appropriate for children.

Trans people in themselves are not dangerous for dc however indoctrination of trans ideology is. Very different.

I don't understand your reason for trying to shoehorn the argument here.

In my opinion the punishment is too light- and that would be my opinion regardless of the sex, the presentation or personality traits such as an identity or ideology.

DdraigGoch · 15/03/2025 20:55

MushMonster · 15/03/2025 20:22

4 years is far too short, plus they have gone and already cut it to half?
Also, the order preventing her from working with children is only for 5 years. It should be for life!

Talking about this, I cannot get over Macron and his wife! They met just like this! Now married for years, but she was his teacher, at 15. She had children too.

Short sentences (and being out on licence for half of it) are pretty routine these days.

Runnersandtoms · 15/03/2025 23:16

Release at the half way point or even earlier is standard due to prison overcrowding. The only exception is extended sentences (only for the most dangerous criminals) when they serve two-thirds before they can apply for parole, or life sentences where a minimum term is specified.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 07:51

whippy1981 · 15/03/2025 16:51

Including white middle class British trans women?

well no not usually trans women. That wouldn’t make a lot of sense would it.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 07:52

maddening · 15/03/2025 20:42

No that is not what anyone has said.

Drag acts are adult entertainment and not appropriate for children.

Trans people in themselves are not dangerous for dc however indoctrination of trans ideology is. Very different.

I don't understand your reason for trying to shoehorn the argument here.

In my opinion the punishment is too light- and that would be my opinion regardless of the sex, the presentation or personality traits such as an identity or ideology.

Trans people in themselves are not dangerous for dc however indoctrination of trans ideology is. Very different.

Let’s try
“Gay people in themselves are not dangerous for dc however indoctrination of gay ideology is”.
See how that sounds?

keswickgirl · 16/03/2025 07:56

YANBU that the sentence is shockingly short.

YABVU to bring up trans people when this story has nothing whatever to do with trans.

whippy1981 · 16/03/2025 08:01

Tandora · 16/03/2025 07:51

well no not usually trans women. That wouldn’t make a lot of sense would it.

Why not?

Bringmeahigherlove · 16/03/2025 08:02

What’s this got to do with trans people?

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:07

Tandora · 16/03/2025 07:52

Trans people in themselves are not dangerous for dc however indoctrination of trans ideology is. Very different.

Let’s try
“Gay people in themselves are not dangerous for dc however indoctrination of gay ideology is”.
See how that sounds?

I would say indoctrination of any ideology is bad - am not aware of a gay ideology though

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:10

But to add - I.would say an ideology which encourages intrusive thoughts and encourages dc to seek medical and surgical changes to a healthy body is more dangerous than one around for example the worship of a deity.

Nameychangington · 16/03/2025 08:19

Tandora · 16/03/2025 07:51

well no not usually trans women. That wouldn’t make a lot of sense would it.

So white British middle class transwomen aren't women? How very transphobic of you.

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 08:23

Nameychangington · 16/03/2025 08:19

So white British middle class transwomen aren't women? How very transphobic of you.

😁

whippy1981 · 16/03/2025 08:25

Nameychangington · 16/03/2025 08:19

So white British middle class transwomen aren't women? How very transphobic of you.

My thought exactly!

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:31

Nameychangington · 16/03/2025 08:19

So white British middle class transwomen aren't women? How very transphobic of you.

🥱.
Sure I could have prefaced “cis” in front of my use of “women”, but for some absurd reason that word is banned on mumsnet and people get very very upset if you use it. It wasn’t necessary anyway, because the meaning was clear from the context.

In any case, I’m not the least bit worried about being.called transphobic, because… I’m not transphobic. Judging by the argument you are trying to pick , I’m guessing you are? That’s all on you to figure out on your own.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:32

TofuFighters · 16/03/2025 08:23

😁

The fact that y’all think that poster is so very clever says it all.

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:35

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:07

I would say indoctrination of any ideology is bad - am not aware of a gay ideology though

am not aware of a gay ideology though

the idea that some people are gay and it’s ok to be gay.

Thats also the only trans “ideology” that exists

maddening · 16/03/2025 08:36

Tandora · 16/03/2025 08:35

am not aware of a gay ideology though

the idea that some people are gay and it’s ok to be gay.

Thats also the only trans “ideology” that exists

Bullshit and you know it