To this is fucking dangerous and why we must get the Tories out?

[dontlookbackyourenotgoingthatway]

This:

nationalconservatism.org/national-conservatism-a-statement-of-principles/

Look at the speakers;

nationalconservatism.org/natcon-uk-2023/

How can anybody who has studied any history whatsoever vote for this?

Are living in some kind of shit, TV movie about the fall of the UK?

https://twitter.com/AdamBienkov/status/1658805622203117568?s=20

Asked if the Prime Minister would condemn David Starkey's comments about slavery and 'white culture' at the NatCon event, which was also addressed by senior Cabinet ministers, his spokesman tells me the PM "would not agree" with the comments.

Rishi Sunak's spokesman asked about David Starkey's offensive comments about slavery this morning at the NatCon event attended by the Home Secretary, tells me that: "it's up to ministers to decide what events they would like to attend."

Rishi Sunak's spokesman says they can't "get into the detail of what was a political event" at Natcon.

Minutes later he reads out a statement about free speech and Kathleen Stock's planned appearance at a political event at Oxford University.

It's certainly only a dream now. The Tories have wrecked the education and health of the nation.

There was a poster earlier on this thread who was convinced Labour has a plan to put rapists into prisons, so perhaps you could search for that post and ask them in more detail what they know of those plans.

If they can afford to rent a place or even to buy a house without the help of other people.

I take it Andersen is opposed to the current governments immigration policies then since he thinks that everyone in this country should be able to get ahead?

You only need 30p to cook a wholesome meal....

I think not understanding why some women need single sex spaces is a mark of privilege.

Perhaps you should search for it since you're apparently the only person who believes it exists.

I have to say as far as the Nat C conference is concerned, Anderson's speech seems rather tame.

I don’t know Starkey nor relate to him but is the part at the bottom re Kathleen Stock’s letter included as you’re against it?

It's a copy and paste of the tweet, the whole tweet, not just selected bits.

I interpreted that comment to mean Sunak wouldn't comment on a political event. And then he did.

Not that the poster was criticising Stock.

Fair enough

I’m glad it’s getting exposure

Troll hunting is against the talk guidelines.

I think it's important to point out that believing people can't change sex is not just a Gender Critical or even feminist position. It is also held dear by those who believe in rigid gender roles and would happily see women educated less, with fewer rights to abortion.

Miriam Cates speech at the Nat Gilead conference was an example. And a reminder.

report it then rather than quoting it again

Oh no more deleted posts. More of same?

What is your point?

That because some undesirables don't believe humans can change sex (which is true) we should pretend we do believe humans can change sex?

Wait until you find out they believe water is wet and the earth orbits around the sun.

I have done.

I missed it was it the same thing?

Its a great shame that some posters on this thread are so determined to shut down any discussion.

One thing that I think is notable in this thread is that no one has taken the opportunity to explain why the NatC ideology is one they support.

It’s a great shame that some posters on this thread are so determined to shut down any discussion.

I didn’t see it but if mnhq think it’s worth deleting but you don’t send them an email.

It wasn't discussion, it was more tedious troll hunting.

And the reason no one has explained why they support "NatC ideology" is, I assume, because no one here does.