Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Original poster

To point out that the PM tried to give his mistress £100k public sector job

418 replies

BadAtMaths2 · 19/06/2022 11:53

No not that one. Carrie when they were having an affair and he was foreign secretary. Wanted to appoint her yo £100k job she wasn't qualified for and without declaring an interest. Story was in The Tumes but has disappeared. Super injunction??

To point out that the PM tried to give his mistress £100k public sector job
OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
RevoltingHumanHead · 19/06/2022 11:55

super shady the way this story has been deleted.

diningiswest · 19/06/2022 11:57

Yes the story about why it disappeared - in early print runs of The Times and now gone from the website - is even more interesting than the story itself.

There have been rumours of a super injunction for a few weeks, which I did think were nonsense but now I am not so sure…

picklemewalnuts · 19/06/2022 11:58

He's the most unethical man imaginable, based purely on his private life.

How anyone voted for him, I can't imagine. Any questions yesterday was farcical about it. Someone claimed he was ethical because he delivered Brexit as he promised. Madness.

jossysgiant · 19/06/2022 12:02

So was he with Carrie, Jennifer and his wife? 🤮 my guess would be super injunction. Just when you think he couldn't get any worse....

MereDintofPandiculation · 19/06/2022 12:03

Any bets on what time this post will disappear from MN?

SwedishEdith · 19/06/2022 12:03

The disappearance of the story is very odd, especially as it actually appeared in print editions of the Times. Was also in the Mail as well. Would have been checked before publishing, surely?

So, I give this thread 10 minutes.

WhatAmIaSlave · 19/06/2022 12:03

jossysgiant · 19/06/2022 12:02

So was he with Carrie, Jennifer and his wife? 🤮 my guess would be super injunction. Just when you think he couldn't get any worse....

More like super infection the way he carries on 🤢

Ifailed · 19/06/2022 12:04

now

jossysgiant · 19/06/2022 12:05

😂😂😂@WhatAmIaSlave

britneyisfree · 19/06/2022 12:05

I wonder how quickly this will be taken down

guinnessguzzler · 19/06/2022 12:06

Happy birthday and a very happy Father's Day to Mr Johnson. Presume he is far too busy celebrating with all his children, who respect and adore him, today to pay attention to any of this nonsense.

For the avoidance of doubt; the man's a lying bag of lies.

wellhelloitsme · 19/06/2022 12:07

Must be a super injunction and they'll have cited potential damage to the kids involved.

He really is just a despicable man.

Bad through and through.

What the fuck do they see in him?! Though I could say the same for people who vote for him.

Original poster
BadAtMaths2 · 19/06/2022 12:11

Surely public interest trumps the kids interest in these circumstances. Maybe they are going for libel. Hard to super injunct something screengrabbed all over the Internet....

OP posts:
Cornettoninja · 19/06/2022 12:12

diningiswest · 19/06/2022 11:57

Yes the story about why it disappeared - in early print runs of The Times and now gone from the website - is even more interesting than the story itself.

There have been rumours of a super injunction for a few weeks, which I did think were nonsense but now I am not so sure…

I’m inclined to think BJ didn’t bother with a super injunction and the story was pulled due to misuse of his connections; mostly because the story is out there and people have copies of it.

bizarre when big dogs internet army are full of vitriol about the BBC and other conspiracies about media propaganda. The irony that the biggest connections are to their favourite mongrel is completely lost on them.

PinkiOcelot · 19/06/2022 12:15

Just when you thought the scrote couldn’t get any worse…….

ilovesooty · 19/06/2022 12:17

picklemewalnuts · 19/06/2022 11:58

He's the most unethical man imaginable, based purely on his private life.

How anyone voted for him, I can't imagine. Any questions yesterday was farcical about it. Someone claimed he was ethical because he delivered Brexit as he promised. Madness.

Plenty of posters on here are ready to justify supporting him. As I've said they have as little moral compass as he has.

Rupertpenrysmistress · 19/06/2022 12:17

It is to depressing for words, I have nothing left to say.

FrecklesMalone · 19/06/2022 12:17

Anyone that votes for him now must have the integrity of a pile of shit.

ilovesooty · 19/06/2022 12:19

FrecklesMalone · 19/06/2022 12:17

Anyone that votes for him now must have the integrity of a pile of shit.

That's probably unfair to piles of shit.

balalake · 19/06/2022 12:22

If when Foreign Secretary Mr Johnson had paid as much attention to matters such as Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe.

Eve · 19/06/2022 12:24

Was it the racist leftie lawyers that he would have consulted for a super injunction?

ilovesooty · 19/06/2022 12:25

balalake · 19/06/2022 12:22

If when Foreign Secretary Mr Johnson had paid as much attention to matters such as Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe.

He showed his unfitness for office then. The evidence was there.

pigsDOfly · 19/06/2022 12:27

No surprises there then.

The man is a moral vacuum.

I'd be more surprised if he hadn't done something like that tbh.

Clavinova · 19/06/2022 12:29

BadAtMaths2
Wanted to appoint her yo £100k job she wasn't qualified for

How do you know she wasn't qualified for the job op? She must have been earning £80k + for the job she already had - your link says she was the Conservative Party's director of communications at the time.

Swipe left for the next trending thread