I agree BUT 2 things:
1 It's being claimed that Rees-Mogg himself brought the children out, he's certainly tried the "I'm a loving family man" Schtick to progress his career!
"R-M benefits from this kind of publicity. He uses his family as part of his public image." Exactly!
"A responsible parent would have sent the children back inside and not exploited them in this way" yep!
2 he and the majority of the Tory party don't think twice about implementing policies that are targeting MILLIONS of disabled children.
But yes it is out of order if only cos "they go low we go high" we shouldn't be stooping to their levels!
Wherever I go the video is heavily edited showing none of what happened before the comments being criticised. As always we're not getting the full picture.
Thefairycaravan - where is the full video? There's a link on class wars page but it seems to have been taken down!
So in my opinion BOTH the protestor AND RM are to blame. 70/30.
Everanewbie - have you or your loved ones been directly affected by Tory policy? Clearly NOT from the tone of your posts (or worse you don't think you are but you are - I have a few friends who vote Tory and they fall into that category yet can't see it!) The kind of people the policies target can only DREAM of private pensions and investments! Plus he's in a better position than the vast majority to withdraw his investment in anything against his morals/religion and invest elsewhere! It's worse than it being his intention to put the poor in impossible life threatening situations - he and his ilk think they deserve it! How can "scumbag" be too strong for someone who consistently votes and campaigns for the poor, sick, disabled to be even WORSE off?!
"but that won't mean he'd seek to change government policy on abortion or gay marriage" but yet he votes accordingly - is that what his constituents want? (Honestly I dread the answer!)
"Maybe he didn't agree with the wording" oh please! You're reaching now!
"When has a load of Tory supporters gone to a poor and disabled persons house and harangued their children." Spiritually/ethically
"I thought there was a news blackout on filming/photographing children for news etc without the parents permission." If JRM brought them out himself that would probably be seen as his giving permission.
Bridgetoc - Bone DOESN NOT represent all socialists/left wingers etc. What a ridiculous statement!
"I feel things have gotten worse - I don't recall seeing much about Blair's kids when they were in downing street" seriously? Blair regularly used them to depict himself as "an ordinary family man" but equally his critics delved into their school records, misdemeanours and iirc there was even talk of corruption regarding a property bought for one of them.
I agree with userxxx (hate those usernames), they can't have it all ways. The mp's shouldn't be using the children to further their careers either.
"The 2 police officials should've bundled all the protestors into a van like in the good old days? Where was the manpower for that?" Are you kidding?! There's around 20,000 fewer police officers that might have something to do with it!
Teething problems? Really? Teething problems generally don't lead to people losing their homes, jobs even their lives! NO Job creation, NO housing being built, just taking support from those MOST IN NEED.
His voting record says it all!
www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/24926/jacob_rees-mogg/north_east_somerset/votes