Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Small boat arrivals at Gosport tonight - huge police motorcade

746 replies

PassMeTheInternet · Yesterday 22:49

This is the police escort for the latest small boat arrivals at Gosport tonight.

What on earth is going on with this country?

I don’t know how to link a video from Twitter. The videos show the full extent of the operation.

Small boat arrivals at Gosport tonight - huge police motorcade
OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:27

cornflakecrunchie · Today 10:20

I'm so angry about it that I can't even comment.

At least please clarify who you are angry with? The government or the demonstrators?

OP posts:
AInightingale · Today 12:28

NowSober · Today 10:48

The UK government has a legal responsibility to provide temporary accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute while their claims are processed.

Which is why Sunak's govt was on the right track in passing legislation which denied anyone arriving here illegally the right to claim asylum in the UK, but insisted that they be processed in a third country. Labour chucked that out in a fit of spiteful stupidity.

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:28

samthepigeon · Today 10:18

You do know this is a new thing, right?

I’m not understanding your question. Please expand.

OP posts:
Mouldemort · Today 12:31

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:16

You have misunderstood my point.

It’s not hard to understand why thousands of people from developing countries want to live here.

What is harder to explain is why our government is allowing this, to the detriment and against the will of its citizens.

We have a duty to take in asylum seekers. They are fleeing war-torn lands, and the vast majority of displaced people end up in adjacent countries. However they get here, they are entitled under international law to claim asylum. About 66% of the succeed, the rest are deported. Asylum seekers are a very small proportion of immigrants - so stop conflating all immigrants with refugees.

The number of asylum seekers has decreased under Labour, and we are 16th in Europe per capita in taking in refugees. Refugees make up less than 1% of the UK population.

Immigration from non-EU countries has declined immensely because of Labour's new visa requirements, after ballooning under the Tories. Immigrants have no recourse to public funds. It's tough to meet the requirement to get a visa.

The UK relies on immigration to run the NHS, do care work, and immigrants as a group are net tax contributors. They tend to be younger, very hard working and ambitious and are no more likely to commit crime than anyone else. We need them to pay tax to fund pensioners.

The only problematic culture in the UK are the racist arseholes burning down houses, blocking ports, committing DV and attacking rescue boats with knives. It's time the government cracked down on these thuggish morons, and stop giving this issue salience.

Gtfto2024 · Today 12:31

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:20

Not seeing a whole lot of kindness on this thread from some towards anyone who wants the boats to stop or protests against them

stupid, rapists, wife beaters, bots, thugs, shall I go on?

Using appropriate descriptors isn't a reflection of kindness or not.

Frugalgal · Today 12:32

This reply has been hidden

This reply has been hidden until the MNHQ team can have a look at it.

Mouldemort · Today 12:32

AInightingale · Today 12:28

Which is why Sunak's govt was on the right track in passing legislation which denied anyone arriving here illegally the right to claim asylum in the UK, but insisted that they be processed in a third country. Labour chucked that out in a fit of spiteful stupidity.

It was illegal under international law, and asylum claims have declined since Sunak - surely you are pleased about that?

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:32

DogAnxiety · Today 10:23

My main question is, who is funding the dodgy algorithm social media content/ pipeline?

I have two theories and they both involve dirty money from overseas, shored up by a few misguided intellectually vilulnerable, low social and economic capital saps donating to Stephen Yaxley Lennon’s/ Jenna Lennon’s and “Danny Tommo”‘s ongoing grifts.

There is also a disturbing group of handmaidens/ captives who apparently like “strong men” who “stand up for are woman and girls” …

Looking into who funds Tommy Robinson yields some interesting results.

OP posts:
MajorProcrastination · Today 12:37

PassMeTheInternet · Yesterday 23:06

No idea why you think ordinary people protesting makes them “like animals”. They are concerned people worried about what is happening to their country and worried that the government is doing nothing to stop boatloads of young undocumented men from cultures completely different to our own arriving.

No need to use dehumanising language.

The last anti-boat protest I saw on the news was all men in fuill black outfits and black balaclavas. Taking fashion inspo from Nazi blackshirts doesn't give "concerned people worried about what is happening to their country. It's giving thug. It's giving violence. It's giving flag shaggers.

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:38

WouldYouLikeAnyToast · Today 10:34

👏👏
Also can't be said loud enough - human beings
Evil starts to flourish when you start dehumanising people.

Evil starts to flourish when you start dehumanising people.

Doesn’t it just?

OP posts:
Pepperlee · Today 12:39

WouldYouLikeAnyToast · Yesterday 23:48

Crowds of masked protesters are now confronting a police line to chants of “let them drown” sung by a child over a megaphone

That poor child. As if you'd take your kid to somewhere like that and have them involved.

Have to agree about the child, yet, we see them on marches too usually carrying a cardboard sign for whatever cause and they haven't a clue what's going on. Also IMO anyone who puts a child on a dinghy to cross the channel should be prosecuted for abuse.

NewGirlInTown · Today 12:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:41

LizzieSiddal · Today 10:39

I’m not sure I’ll get an answer to this question but if the Uk was invaded by say Russia or China and our lives were absolutely horrific, wouldn’t you be helping and encouraging your young adult son/daughter to get to a safe country so they could have a better life?

I know, without a doubt I would be!

No-one is questioning that people will always want to move to other countries (these people are not mostly escaping wars btw). The issue is how this is dealt with by our government. It is not our responsibility to take in and support every person who wants to arrive here.

OP posts:
PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:45

WouldYouLikeAnyToast · Today 10:46

Why not answer the question?

It’s not a relevant question. The issue is how the government responds to illegal immigration, not that people try to enter our country by illegal means.

OP posts:
NowSober · Today 12:48

AInightingale · Today 12:28

Which is why Sunak's govt was on the right track in passing legislation which denied anyone arriving here illegally the right to claim asylum in the UK, but insisted that they be processed in a third country. Labour chucked that out in a fit of spiteful stupidity.

The Tory plan was not for asylum seekers to be processed in a third country but for them to be deported to Rwanda never to be seen or thought of again.

Mouldemort · Today 12:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It's almost like you are from fascist central casting!

A handful of refugees every year is not an "invasion," "something global" is a dog whistle, and if you want your daughters protected, keep them away from the wife-beating thugs who are rioting.

Frugalgal · Today 12:49

PassMeTheInternet · Yesterday 23:01

The size, expense and amount of prep planning going on here is incredible. Someone on Twitter said it’s bigger than the police escorts he’s seen when nuclear weapons are transported.

Imagine if all this money and manpower was put into stopping the boats?

Are we going to take control of the French border?

Aside from going back into the EU , that's the only way to stop it.

The country is plagued by idiots who think there are simple solutions to complex problems.

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:50

NoisyHiker · Today 10:56

They should not be.

The law has not caught up to modern times yet.

Now it is possible for millions of people to travel here and enter illegally, asylum law needs to be changed. These rules were only practical when very few could travel and claim asylum.

No country should be obligated to provide for the rest of the world at the expense of their own people.

Exactly.

People talk as if our legal system is set in stone and impossible to change. It’s nonsense.

The authorities seem to be able to bring in new legislation quickly enough when it suits them.

OP posts:
Slightyamusedandsilly · Today 12:51

Mouldemort · Today 12:48

It's almost like you are from fascist central casting!

A handful of refugees every year is not an "invasion," "something global" is a dog whistle, and if you want your daughters protected, keep them away from the wife-beating thugs who are rioting.

Mouldy, I love you!

2dogsandabudgie · Today 12:52

@Babyboomtastic - With migration though you have to look at the size of the country in landmass as well as population size.

The UK has a population of 69-70 million with 285 people per sq km.

France has 66-68 million but is 2.65 times larger than the UK in landmass and has 122-127 people per sq km.

Spain has 91 people per sq. km.

Poland has 80-83 people per sq. km.

Germany has the largest population of 84 million but because of the landmass size has 240-243 people per sq. km.

If you take England as a country on its own, it has a huge 430 people per sq. km. It doesn't come as a surprise that England feels overcrowded.

When do you say enough is enough. When the UK reaches 80 million, 90 million, 100 million?

usernamealreadytaken · Today 12:52

JemimaTiggywinkles · Yesterday 23:00

Maybe if our upstanding citizens could behave like humans rather than animals the police wouldn’t need to be there. But when we are required to close lifeboat stations because of horrendous thugs the police are going to need to do all sorts of protection work that should be completely unnecessary.

People who have crossed in small boats should be detained and processed properly. Such a shame that police protection is required in order for immigration officials to carry out their duties.

If arrivals were properly detained, processed, and deported, then I'm sure there would be fewer protests.

DogAnxiety · Today 12:52

how could I forget “global conspiracy” and “invasion” from my Tommeh Bingo card? Silly
me.

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:53

hypnovic · Today 10:58

Yeah because wearing a balaclava shouting about "boat people" and slashing rescue boats isn't dehumanising at all!! These thugs are not protesters. They are hateful morons

It’s a bit late on the thread to still be claiming the protestors are all masked men.

Do carry on with your demonising untruths if you must though.

OP posts:
Mouldemort · Today 12:53

PassMeTheInternet · Today 12:45

It’s not a relevant question. The issue is how the government responds to illegal immigration, not that people try to enter our country by illegal means.

The government responds to undocumented migrants by deporting them.

They respond to asylum claimants (who are permitted to enter the country by irregular means) by processing their claims, and either granting them refugee status or deporting them. Deportations have significantly increased under Labour.

EasternStandard · Today 12:53

NowSober · Today 12:48

The Tory plan was not for asylum seekers to be processed in a third country but for them to be deported to Rwanda never to be seen or thought of again.

It mirrored the Aus system. Which means we could have safe passage as they do for women and children instead. But no we need overcrowded dinghies with high risk, and deaths at sea.

And to make it even harder almost impossible for women to join later.

Swipe left for the next trending thread