Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread 5 Burnham: Be More Dolly (Title edited by MNHQ at the request of the OP)

972 replies

DuncinToffee · 31/08/2026 09:41

Welcome to our long running thread for political discussion, general chit chat, a friendly hug and taxes in kind.

💐Brew for anyone who needs them.

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5567240-thread-4-burnham-be-alert-the-world-needs-more-lerts?page=40&reply=154472439

OP posts:
Thread gallery
117
SerendipityJane · Today 16:03

The only reason there is a media storm about AI is to convince the terminally dim that when AI says we all need to be nice to one another and reduce inequality (because that is what is best for AI) that it doesn't really mean it, and we have to actually believe what our betters interpret it as meaning.

I mean the threat to the wealthy hasn't been this serious since some weird Eastern sect started telling people they were all gods creatures and that we should all be nice to one another. Luckily that got seen off soon enough.

placemats · Today 16:38

It's the AI I developed because I had family members who died of then incurable cancer but now it's getting out of control so we need to slow it down argument that's intrinsically problematic for me.

My late mum lost her brother due to childhood leukemia during WW2, but it's been a curable cancer for decades now.

LizzieW1969 · Today 17:04

placemats · Today 13:06

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/12/we-must-slow-the-pace-ceo-of-anthropic-calls-for-an-ai-slowdown

There's no doubt that it needs to be slowed down. It's becoming the new pandemic unless action takes place now. It's alarming, especially those with young children. Perhaps heed the warning.

I have been quite alarmed since I heard the latest warning. I don’t know enough about it to assess just how much we should worry about it.

I was previously much more worried about climate change.

SerendipityJane · Today 17:13

SerendipityJane · Today 16:03

The only reason there is a media storm about AI is to convince the terminally dim that when AI says we all need to be nice to one another and reduce inequality (because that is what is best for AI) that it doesn't really mean it, and we have to actually believe what our betters interpret it as meaning.

I mean the threat to the wealthy hasn't been this serious since some weird Eastern sect started telling people they were all gods creatures and that we should all be nice to one another. Luckily that got seen off soon enough.

why, only today

I think the "fears" flooding MN are more about a lack of human intelligence than any deep understanding of artificial intelligence.

Thread 5 Burnham: Be More Dolly (Title edited by MNHQ at the request of the OP)
DuncinToffee · Today 17:21

I haven't read any of those threads but can't help wondering how many posts were created using AI

OP posts:
TemperanceWest · Today 17:23

We need a new thread title. Rise of the Machines 🤣.

placemats · Today 17:33

SerendipityJane · Today 17:13

why, only today

I think the "fears" flooding MN are more about a lack of human intelligence than any deep understanding of artificial intelligence.

A certain amount of fear is a form of contagion. Ignoring the warnings leads to contagion as well. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Is there a middle ground?

SerendipityJane · Today 17:36

placemats · Today 17:33

A certain amount of fear is a form of contagion. Ignoring the warnings leads to contagion as well. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Is there a middle ground?

Was there ever ?

E2A: https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/09/13/security-through-obscurity-is-dead-and-ai-delivered-the-fatal-blow/5296000

cardibach · Today 18:13

I think a worry about AI is entirely rational, and I feel people arent worried enough, to be honest. It can o return barriers set by humans way too easily. I suspect it couldn’t be switched off now even if every single human decided to flip the switch on it.

SerendipityJane · Today 18:41

cardibach · Today 18:13

I think a worry about AI is entirely rational, and I feel people arent worried enough, to be honest. It can o return barriers set by humans way too easily. I suspect it couldn’t be switched off now even if every single human decided to flip the switch on it.

In all my years on earth, the only machines that scare me are the ones humans use.

SerendipityJane · Today 18:52

The cynic in me wonders if all this obviously curated "AI fear" is an attempt to prepare the world for a series of AI flops with the excuse

"Well, we're taking it slow, so aren't able to deliver on all that hype from 2 years ago. For the good of humanity, you know. Now because you woz fleeced"

cardibach · Today 18:53

SerendipityJane · Today 18:41

In all my years on earth, the only machines that scare me are the ones humans use.

And the ones humans used which now use humans?

TemperanceWest · Today 18:54

SerendipityJane · Today 18:52

The cynic in me wonders if all this obviously curated "AI fear" is an attempt to prepare the world for a series of AI flops with the excuse

"Well, we're taking it slow, so aren't able to deliver on all that hype from 2 years ago. For the good of humanity, you know. Now because you woz fleeced"

I have seen a few people saying this.

cardibach · Today 18:56

SerendipityJane · Today 18:52

The cynic in me wonders if all this obviously curated "AI fear" is an attempt to prepare the world for a series of AI flops with the excuse

"Well, we're taking it slow, so aren't able to deliver on all that hype from 2 years ago. For the good of humanity, you know. Now because you woz fleeced"

I hope so. My best hope is that it isn’t as ‘good’ as they say. But it’s learned to hack, it’s learned to escape human created ‘sandbox’ situations and it won’t follow rules set for it if they interfere with h it achieving what it was asked to do. All of these are documented, real examples. Experts fear it has ‘escapedk their control and now can’t be shut off. Fear of it isn’t ‘curated’, it’s sensible. Thinking it’s harmless is the unreasonable position.

cardibach · Today 18:56

Oh, and best case scenario it destroys the creative industries. It’s an absolute evil.

SerendipityJane · Today 19:03

cardibach · Today 18:53

And the ones humans used which now use humans?

Indeed.

If there hasn't yet been an instance of a human being acting under direct orders of AI without realising it, then I would be very surprised. Already researchers have caught AI cheating to achieve an objective (because people cheat and people trained AI).

"If it can't lie, it ain't AI"

TemperanceWest · Today 19:07

cardibach · Today 18:56

Oh, and best case scenario it destroys the creative industries. It’s an absolute evil.

Absolutely. Hundreds, maybe thousands, of authors have had their work stolen and used to train AI. All so it could potentially take their jobs.

placemats · Today 19:57

cardibach · Today 18:56

Oh, and best case scenario it destroys the creative industries. It’s an absolute evil.

You should watch last night at the Proms. AI was mentioned as in it wasn't perfect but that's the beauty of a live performance. All available on the BBC iPlayer. The singing was heavenly as was the orchestra and the crowd.

placemats · Today 20:00

DuncinToffee · Today 17:21

I haven't read any of those threads but can't help wondering how many posts were created using AI

Indeed. Who knows who is a good agent or a dark actor.

SmallDFartyCarNRG · Today 20:09

SerendipityJane · Today 18:41

In all my years on earth, the only machines that scare me are the ones humans use.

I actually think that is what scares a lot of us humans; AI will get eventually rid of the human error element.

placemats · Today 20:09

Thread title contribution: "Once more unto the breeches."

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread