'If you are a child, you may well get better treatment or equipment at school – even transport to and
from home.' See pages 6 and 19.
Their argument is that the purpose of a diagnosis is for you to better understand yourself but it should not require anything further from your employer or school. So if you are a child with a disability you should not receive adjustments, appropriate equipment or transport to and from school.
The rest of the document puts our ills on regulations (HR in particular), environmentalism, the focus on Mental Health and 'the Bureacractic class' assault on capitalism and the nation state. A lot of the evidence and opinion quoted is US based. Matthew Goodwin gets a couple of name checks.
It's simply a different version of Truss. It fits perfectly with the IEA/Legatum agenda.
Complaining about adjustments for disabled kids and suggesting they are at an advantage by virtue of their diagnosis seems like a new low to me however.