Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Or is this victim blaming?

511 replies

Feedingmybaby · Today 11:26

Just to begin, I consider myself a feminist, advocate for women’s rights (of course!) etc etc.

but I struggle with the line when it comes to victim blaming in some cases of rape and sexual assault.

In recent years, we’ve seen a rise in cases regarding women (often drunkenly) going back to hotel rooms and being raped once there. I fully support the conviction in such cases and have sympathy for the women.

However, I just don’t understand why some women put themselves in such dangerous situations? It’s a shame we have to think this way (ie. Be ‘on guard’ and cautious of men/rape/sexual assault), but it’s clear that something like this could happen if going to a hotel room with a man you do not know very well. So why do it?
I compare this to walking alone in the dark - we should be able to do this as women! But unfortunately, the vast majority of women wouldn’t do this due to the perceived danger. Yet why is pointing out the danger of going to a hotel room of a man you do not know considered victim blaming?

OP posts:
Owlbookend · Today 16:57

& people who never walk anywhere alone have priviledged lives. How do you think people get to work who dont have a car? You have to get to the tube/bus/train.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:00

seahorsessky · Today 15:12

You only talk about women at risk from men-it can apply to men (either as victims of other men, or as victims of women, though we don't know how many there are as so few report).
And women can be assaulted by other women, yet that is not talked about enough.
But you're right. When there is a data breach, we don't blame the thief-we blame the victim for not protecting the data! If a thief drives of with your car when you left it unlocked, we blame you! No, that's not the same as rape, but your principle is the same.

Absolute piffle. Examining the risk factors of the situation is going back down the slippery slope we’ve just conquered, where blame is apportioned to women to mitigate mens’ crimes. Next we’ll be hearing phrases like ‘she was asking for it’ again. No means no. In all circumstances. Doesn’t matter what she’s wearing, where she is or what she’s doing. Men have absolutely no right to assume consent. If it’s given fine, if not jog on.

Cetera · Today 17:00

It is victim blaming OP.
Women and girls should not have to take responsibility for preventing male violence by restricting their own lives.
A male isn't automatically safe because he's a husband, relative, boyfriend, colleague, neighbour or someone a girl or woman has known for years. Why should women and girls question how much freedom they should give up to avoid being attacked by a man? Why should women and girls be expected to organise their lives around the possibility of male violence in the first place?
Women and girls deserve to walk, travel, work, date, socialise and live their bloody lives without having to calculate the risk of being assaulted, abused, raped or killed by a man. Telling women and girls to take more precautions is not the same as being offered safety.
We teach our girls to be vigilant. Don't walk alone. Don't wear headphones. Watch your drink. Share your location. Check who's behind you. Don't get into a taxi alone. Don't trust too easily. Don't put yourself in vulnerable situations.
We are warning them to organise their lives around the possibility of being attacked by a man.
It is utterly depressing.

ConstantlyFuriosa · Today 17:03

LVPLVT · Today 15:07

If it’s so straightforward why isn’t it working? Rape has generally been a criminal offence in the UK for the last 750 years (though has obviously the exact definition has evolved in that time). As disgusting as it was, the marriage exemption was repealed before I was even born. I went to university in 2012 and we had talks on consent - that was not the first time I had been ‘educated’ on it.

Presumably, parents of boys have been telling them not to rape women for decades if not centuries. At a societal level, rape is often seen as equivalent in severity to murder and child molestation.

Men know it is wrong, they know they shouldn’t do it, and in my view, no amount of education is going to eradicate it. If we lived in an ideal world no one would ever harm anyone else! But that isn’t the reality.

The manosphere. Incels. Andrew Tate and the rise of misogyny and misinformation easily spread and perpetuated on social media like an ideological virus.

Maybe that’s got something to do with it?

Regardless. Women should not be the ones having to limit their lived experience just in case they get assaulted by men. It also infantilises men and takes away responsibility for their actions because they supposedly just can’t help themselves. Once again the burden shifts to women and we have to shoulder that responsibility.

It’s absolutely not how this should still be playing out and we shouldn’t be shrugging our shoulders and going: ‘Meh; Men will be men, what are you gonna do?’ about it.

Fuck that.

PeasOff · Today 17:03

shuggles · Today 16:45

That's completely bonkers. I would never walk alone in London, or any other major city, at night.

I was brought up not to. Either get a taxi, or be with a crowd of people. That's the rule.

That's your personal choice, but it's ridiculous to turn it into a universal rule! What about women who work night shifts, rely on public transport, can't afford taxis or have nobody to walk home with? Are they supposed to give up work or restrict their lives because it's dark?

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:03

MaggieBsBoat · Today 16:09

Ridiculous. And wrong.

Read OP’s post of 13.19 today and then tell me you still think this poster is ridiculous and wrong. It’s victim blaming 101 and bordering on suggesting that some women are ‘asking for it’.

shuggles · Today 17:05

@OsfameronTanamoril We all have different risk appetites. But London is not Mogadishu!

Questionable, sometimes.

Dogsceptic · Today 17:07

Feedingmybaby · Today 11:53

No it’s not.

A person running across a motorway doesn’t deserve to get hit by a car. A person walking on the path doesn’t deserve to get hit by a car. But one person has put themselves in a scenario where it’s more likely they will be hit by a car.

Excellent analogy.

Dutch1e · Today 17:09

shuggles · Today 16:45

That's completely bonkers. I would never walk alone in London, or any other major city, at night.

I was brought up not to. Either get a taxi, or be with a crowd of people. That's the rule.

That's the rule

I find that quite sad. Not in a condescending way, just wistful for what you've missed. Wandering your own city alone in the dark is lovely. It can be meditative, or thrilling, or (often) just mundane.

But it's mine.

Cetera · Today 17:11

Being in a situation where a man has the opportunity to choose whether to commit violence against you is not the same as accepting a risk of accidental harm.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:11

Feedingmybaby · Today 13:19

Hmmmmm. I’m not sure. I’m an ideal world a woman should be able to wear whatever she wants to! But do I think that a woman dressed in a super revealing way will attract more male attention? Yes. And that if a woman doesn’t want this kind of attention then it would be best not to dress like this? Maybe. It depends how upset she would be with this attention I suppose. Unfortunately there are lots of men out there who would probably jump to conclusions about why she’s dressed like this and think nothing of behaving horribly (in my opinion - I suppose some women may like this behaviour?) due to the way she’s dressed.

I don’t think it would make her more likely to be raped. But I think a portion of men may believe she would be more up for sex? And therefore would treat her in a more sexual way?

I don’t agree with this, but unfortunately we don’t live in an ideal world.

You say you don’t agree with it, but your advice to women is don’t dress or behave in a certain way if you don’t want male attention or to be treated as a sexual plaything. I seriously don’t get why you don’t understand how offensive that is. It is NOT on women to moderate their dress or behaviour, or anything else for that matter, for fear of being assaulted or raped. Men’s behaviour is not the responsibility of women and never will be. Rape or sexual assault cannot be mitigated by the behaviour of the victim, You call yourself a feminist but if you repeated this utter garbage to an actual feminist you’d be handed your arse on a plate.

Chickpeacurrywithrice · Today 17:11

LetMeGoogleThat · Today 15:15

Man can rape other men, women cannot commit rape. SA is not what the OP was asking about, this thread specifically asked about rape, hence the responses.

But it didn’t?

it asked about rape and sexual assault

the OP

but I struggle with the line when it comes to victim blaming in some cases of rape and sexual assault.

Chickpeacurrywithrice · Today 17:12

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:11

You say you don’t agree with it, but your advice to women is don’t dress or behave in a certain way if you don’t want male attention or to be treated as a sexual plaything. I seriously don’t get why you don’t understand how offensive that is. It is NOT on women to moderate their dress or behaviour, or anything else for that matter, for fear of being assaulted or raped. Men’s behaviour is not the responsibility of women and never will be. Rape or sexual assault cannot be mitigated by the behaviour of the victim, You call yourself a feminist but if you repeated this utter garbage to an actual feminist you’d be handed your arse on a plate.

Edited

👏

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:13

Dogsceptic · Today 17:07

Excellent analogy.

Is it ? Hitting someone with a car isn’t a deliberate act. Rape is.

Dutch1e · Today 17:14

Dogsceptic · Today 17:07

Excellent analogy.

How is it excellent? Are men at the wheel of a 2 tonne speeding penis hurtling down a road you step into? And no matter how they try to swerve, they just couldn't avoid cramming it up your hole?

Dogsceptic · Today 17:15

Ethelspagetti · Today 12:25

Rape is rape but harder to prove if they’ve agreed to drunken sex and woke up being raped later in the night. It’s still rape but she’s made herself vulnerable with an unknown person. Bit like walking about with a thousand pounds cash in our hands. Theft is still theft but better to hide the money and valuables away.

This

dairydebris · Today 17:15

worldshottestmom · Today 16:44

I'm a bit confused by this comment, it feels it starts one way then ends somewhere else.

So, when my sister was asleep in bed and her partner raped her, it was her fault for being asleep in her own bed and putting herself in that situatuon? It was her fault for choosing a bad partner? Is that correct? Sorry I am genuinely trying to understand if this would be in line with the logic of your comment, or if I've misunderstood.

Her responsibility was being in her own bed. Her responsibility would also have been ignoring any red flags that this asshole would be a rapist, and allowing him to share her bed. Note responsibility, not blame.

It was not her fault. Because fault implies wrongdoing, of which she did none.

I am responsible for finding myself out at night with no taxi fare. Thats my responsibility. I am responsible if I choose to enter a hotel room with a virtual stranger. I am responsible if I choose to get drunk with a man who gives off weird vibes but is really good looking. Those bits are with me, I control them, I can choose to do or not do those things.

However, none of those things are actual wrongdoings, none of them are in any way morally wrong. So there is no blame with me.

The actual rape, the decision to force oneself upon someone else without their consent and cause harm to them, that is the wrongdoing so that is where the blame lies. All of it.

I choose this way of thinking so I have at least some control of my world. As long as I did nothing wrong, I don't accept blame. I will accept responsibility for my own actions though, because then I can change my pen actions in the future and lessen the chance of being in that situation again.

I did think most people felt this way but I'm starting to wonder if thats wrong.

AllotmentOtter · Today 17:16

SouthLondonMum22 · Today 11:47

It is victim blaming. How isn't it?

I've drunkenly gone back to hotels with several men during my younger, single days and I was never raped because none of those men were rapists. It only happens when a man thinks it's acceptable to rape someone.

Always the rapists fault. No if's or but's.

At various points in my life I, too, have had drunken one night stands several times and have never been raped.

Way back in my youth I would regularly hitchhike but never got raped.

I've walked alone in the dark more times than I can remember, in both town and countryside.

In all my 59 years of frequently putting myself 'in a position where something scary like this could happen' I've never been raped because none of the men I slept with, or who offered me a lift, or saw me walking alone at night were rapists. They were all respectful - even the ones who didn't get what they were hoping for because I was actually too drunk!

The one and only man who attempted to have sex with me after I'd said no (twice) was my first husband. A man I should have felt safe with.

So yes, I do think you're victim blaming.

OsfameronTanamoril · Today 17:17

dairydebris · Today 17:15

Her responsibility was being in her own bed. Her responsibility would also have been ignoring any red flags that this asshole would be a rapist, and allowing him to share her bed. Note responsibility, not blame.

It was not her fault. Because fault implies wrongdoing, of which she did none.

I am responsible for finding myself out at night with no taxi fare. Thats my responsibility. I am responsible if I choose to enter a hotel room with a virtual stranger. I am responsible if I choose to get drunk with a man who gives off weird vibes but is really good looking. Those bits are with me, I control them, I can choose to do or not do those things.

However, none of those things are actual wrongdoings, none of them are in any way morally wrong. So there is no blame with me.

The actual rape, the decision to force oneself upon someone else without their consent and cause harm to them, that is the wrongdoing so that is where the blame lies. All of it.

I choose this way of thinking so I have at least some control of my world. As long as I did nothing wrong, I don't accept blame. I will accept responsibility for my own actions though, because then I can change my pen actions in the future and lessen the chance of being in that situation again.

I did think most people felt this way but I'm starting to wonder if thats wrong.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Seems like quibbling over semantics.

LetMeGoogleThat · Today 17:19

Dutch1e · Today 17:14

How is it excellent? Are men at the wheel of a 2 tonne speeding penis hurtling down a road you step into? And no matter how they try to swerve, they just couldn't avoid cramming it up your hole?

Its an incredibly serious subject, but your analogy has made me laugh....speeding penis 🙈

nietzscheanvibe · Today 17:19

SouthLondonMum22 · Today 16:56

You can't leave your vagina at home or lock it up. It just isn't comparable.

It ignores the fact that stranger rape is already incredibly rare and is unlikely to happen even if you walk alone at night. It also ignores the fact that you can't actually protect yourself from the most common type of rape because it would involve never having any type of relationship with a man yet the vast majority of women take that risk which is a bigger risk than any of the other risks women are told to avoid for their apparent safety.

Edited

But none of that equates to saying "there's a risk inherent in taking a man you barely know back to your hotel room" = "victim-blaming" which was, I think, the OP's initial point.

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:19

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:11

You say you don’t agree with it, but your advice to women is don’t dress or behave in a certain way if you don’t want male attention or to be treated as a sexual plaything. I seriously don’t get why you don’t understand how offensive that is. It is NOT on women to moderate their dress or behaviour, or anything else for that matter, for fear of being assaulted or raped. Men’s behaviour is not the responsibility of women and never will be. Rape or sexual assault cannot be mitigated by the behaviour of the victim, You call yourself a feminist but if you repeated this utter garbage to an actual feminist you’d be handed your arse on a plate.

Edited

I wouldn’t say it’s quite that straightforward.

If your 15 year old daughter came downstairs with an incredibly short skirt, would you not advise her that it’s too short and to go and change it?

I think it’s awful that women have to even think of taking these precautions but ultimately, I believe the girl in the longer skirt would be of a lower risk of catcalling to the woman in the short skirt. And knowing that my daughter would be horrified at being catcalled, I would advise to wear the longer skirt. I don’t think that women are responsible for men’s abhorrent behaviour, but that there are ways to reduce the level of attention if that’s what is wanted.

OP posts:
Cetera · Today 17:21

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn at author's request

SouthLondonMum22 · Today 17:23

Dogsceptic · Today 17:07

Excellent analogy.

Not really. Stranger rape is rare, you're more likely to be raped by a man you know so it isn't riskier.

Rape is also intentional, not accidental. Obviously.

PinkArt · Today 17:25

Fucking hell. It's depressing enough seeing this scummy kind of commentary from asshole men on twitter, but an apparent woman on mumsnet??
OP obviously your revolting views are victim blaming. You even got as far as well if she will go out dressed like that... Not to mention the suggestion that there is some sort of rape hierachy and stranger rape victims were asking for it more than women raped by people they know.
What is MOST interesting and depressing is the timing of this though. Some of Russell Brand's victims finally got justice yesterday. David Walliams finally stopped being able to injunct himself away from justice today. And today of all days THIS is what you chose to write on the subject of rape. Not how heinous those men are, or how brave their victims were, not what men can do to be better, no what you chose to add to the discourse was is it really victim blaming if I say I know rape is wrong but..... YES, yes it is victim blaming and it is shameful.

Swipe left for the next trending thread