Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Or is this victim blaming?

511 replies

Feedingmybaby · Today 11:26

Just to begin, I consider myself a feminist, advocate for women’s rights (of course!) etc etc.

but I struggle with the line when it comes to victim blaming in some cases of rape and sexual assault.

In recent years, we’ve seen a rise in cases regarding women (often drunkenly) going back to hotel rooms and being raped once there. I fully support the conviction in such cases and have sympathy for the women.

However, I just don’t understand why some women put themselves in such dangerous situations? It’s a shame we have to think this way (ie. Be ‘on guard’ and cautious of men/rape/sexual assault), but it’s clear that something like this could happen if going to a hotel room with a man you do not know very well. So why do it?
I compare this to walking alone in the dark - we should be able to do this as women! But unfortunately, the vast majority of women wouldn’t do this due to the perceived danger. Yet why is pointing out the danger of going to a hotel room of a man you do not know considered victim blaming?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
5128gap · Today 18:05

blondeseaside · Today 17:57

It is NOT on women to moderate their dress or behaviour

In an ideal world, yes. But we don't live in an ideal world, and that's the whole point. I was driving home in the dark one night, and I had to go under a bridge. There was a pretty young lady walking alone under said bridge, wearing dungarees and nothing underneath, so I could literally see her side breasts. Should she be able to walk around with side boob showing late at night - yes. Should she actually do it? Fucking no.

Men don't turn into rapists because pretty young women in dungarees are showing the sides of their breasts. Rape doesn't occur due to overwhelming temptation faced by men.
If that young woman had happened upon a rapist under that bridge she would have been raped regardless of her clothes. Equally if she had passed by decent men who wouldn't rape, she would have been perfectly safe.

dairydebris · Today 18:05

Dogsceptic · Today 18:01

It isn’t a case of ‘blame’, but of taking responsibility.
If you get drunk and can’t remember what you are doing, and the man is also drunk, how is he more to blame than you?
Better just not to get drunk so you can say no, and leave. Same for him.
Why are men supposed to be somehow in control at all times, even if drunk , but the woman is not responsible at all?

Is that you, Debbie?

ThreadGuardDog · Today 18:05

Dogsceptic · Today 18:01

It isn’t a case of ‘blame’, but of taking responsibility.
If you get drunk and can’t remember what you are doing, and the man is also drunk, how is he more to blame than you?
Better just not to get drunk so you can say no, and leave. Same for him.
Why are men supposed to be somehow in control at all times, even if drunk , but the woman is not responsible at all?

Getting drunk and not remembering what you are doing isn’t a green light for a man to do as he likes - how drunk or sober he is, is irrelevant. So many people still not getting this. Women are not responsible for mens’ behaviour. The decision to rape is on the rapist not the victim. It’s sending a message to men that they are not responsible for their actions. If there is no consent, or there is doubt then it’s not OK to assume that you have it just because someone has had too much to drink and can’t fight you off.

Cetera · Today 18:05

Men should be expected to know not to rape, whether they are drunk or sober.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 18:02

nopenotplaying · Today 17:58

I think I get what you mean. Due to the awful people in the world we still need to protect ourselves. In the 90s I found myself through naivety, in situations where I could have come to harm. It happened. I was drunk, the kind of drunk where you don’t care. Two ‘men’ chatted me up, have me some pills. I felt funny, they both had sex with me. I didn’t say no. But I didn’t say yes either, I was on my period at the time and I remember them removing my tampon. This was non consensual, rape. Had I not been drunk, which then opened my mind to taking the pills (date rape drug I assume) it wouldn’t have happened. But there’s no comeback. I don’t know who they are. But if it was a celeb or two and I did know I would definitely come forward and say now that it was wrong. At the time I thought I was just a stupid girl getting myself into that situation

Drunk or not, the fact that you were raped is still on the rapists and not you💐

Dogsceptic · Today 18:01

It isn’t a case of ‘blame’, but of taking responsibility.
If you get drunk and can’t remember what you are doing, and the man is also drunk, how is he more to blame than you?
Better just not to get drunk so you can say no, and leave. Same for him.
Why are men supposed to be somehow in control at all times, even if drunk , but the woman is not responsible at all?

Cetera · Today 18:01

nopenotplaying · Today 17:58

I think I get what you mean. Due to the awful people in the world we still need to protect ourselves. In the 90s I found myself through naivety, in situations where I could have come to harm. It happened. I was drunk, the kind of drunk where you don’t care. Two ‘men’ chatted me up, have me some pills. I felt funny, they both had sex with me. I didn’t say no. But I didn’t say yes either, I was on my period at the time and I remember them removing my tampon. This was non consensual, rape. Had I not been drunk, which then opened my mind to taking the pills (date rape drug I assume) it wouldn’t have happened. But there’s no comeback. I don’t know who they are. But if it was a celeb or two and I did know I would definitely come forward and say now that it was wrong. At the time I thought I was just a stupid girl getting myself into that situation

Jesus that’s horrific. I’m sorry you went through that.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 18:01

ConstantlyFuriosa · Today 17:03

The manosphere. Incels. Andrew Tate and the rise of misogyny and misinformation easily spread and perpetuated on social media like an ideological virus.

Maybe that’s got something to do with it?

Regardless. Women should not be the ones having to limit their lived experience just in case they get assaulted by men. It also infantilises men and takes away responsibility for their actions because they supposedly just can’t help themselves. Once again the burden shifts to women and we have to shoulder that responsibility.

It’s absolutely not how this should still be playing out and we shouldn’t be shrugging our shoulders and going: ‘Meh; Men will be men, what are you gonna do?’ about it.

Fuck that.

I’m amazed at the number of posters, obviously including OP, who genuinely believe that women should live self limited lives and restrict how they dress in order not to attract unwanted attention. It feels like we’ve gone back in time to the 1950’s.

nopenotplaying · Today 17:58

I think I get what you mean. Due to the awful people in the world we still need to protect ourselves. In the 90s I found myself through naivety, in situations where I could have come to harm. It happened. I was drunk, the kind of drunk where you don’t care. Two ‘men’ chatted me up, have me some pills. I felt funny, they both had sex with me. I didn’t say no. But I didn’t say yes either, I was on my period at the time and I remember them removing my tampon. This was non consensual, rape. Had I not been drunk, which then opened my mind to taking the pills (date rape drug I assume) it wouldn’t have happened. But there’s no comeback. I don’t know who they are. But if it was a celeb or two and I did know I would definitely come forward and say now that it was wrong. At the time I thought I was just a stupid girl getting myself into that situation

blondeseaside · Today 17:57

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:11

You say you don’t agree with it, but your advice to women is don’t dress or behave in a certain way if you don’t want male attention or to be treated as a sexual plaything. I seriously don’t get why you don’t understand how offensive that is. It is NOT on women to moderate their dress or behaviour, or anything else for that matter, for fear of being assaulted or raped. Men’s behaviour is not the responsibility of women and never will be. Rape or sexual assault cannot be mitigated by the behaviour of the victim, You call yourself a feminist but if you repeated this utter garbage to an actual feminist you’d be handed your arse on a plate.

Edited

It is NOT on women to moderate their dress or behaviour

In an ideal world, yes. But we don't live in an ideal world, and that's the whole point. I was driving home in the dark one night, and I had to go under a bridge. There was a pretty young lady walking alone under said bridge, wearing dungarees and nothing underneath, so I could literally see her side breasts. Should she be able to walk around with side boob showing late at night - yes. Should she actually do it? Fucking no.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:56

nietzscheanvibe · Today 17:48

I don't dispute any of that, but it doesn't address my statement that "acknowledging risk" isn't "victim-blaming" 🤷‍♂️

Maybe not, but this certainly is: But do I think that a woman dressed in a super revealing way will attract more male attention? Yes. And that if a woman doesn’t want this kind of attention then it would be best not to dress like this?

Chickpeacurrywithrice · Today 17:55

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:45

It definitely doesn’t. But if she didn’t want to consent, why not just stay at home? He obviously didn’t want to know her for her amazing personality. She shouldn’t have to have stayed at home - she should be able to parade naked all around his house without him expecting sex in an ideal world. But obviously he was going to expect sex judging by their previous encounter, so why even go?

I don’t think she’s to blame at all - the rapist is always to blame. But the level of risk there was just insane!

You very clearly do think she’s to blame, is so bloody obvious!

PeasOff · Today 17:53

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:52

I suspect if you replace the word ‘vulnerable’ with ‘available’ you’ll be nearer the mark as to what this poster really thinks.

I suspect you're right...

WhereAreTheTrueGreens · Today 17:53

PinkArt · Today 17:25

Fucking hell. It's depressing enough seeing this scummy kind of commentary from asshole men on twitter, but an apparent woman on mumsnet??
OP obviously your revolting views are victim blaming. You even got as far as well if she will go out dressed like that... Not to mention the suggestion that there is some sort of rape hierachy and stranger rape victims were asking for it more than women raped by people they know.
What is MOST interesting and depressing is the timing of this though. Some of Russell Brand's victims finally got justice yesterday. David Walliams finally stopped being able to injunct himself away from justice today. And today of all days THIS is what you chose to write on the subject of rape. Not how heinous those men are, or how brave their victims were, not what men can do to be better, no what you chose to add to the discourse was is it really victim blaming if I say I know rape is wrong but..... YES, yes it is victim blaming and it is shameful.

Yep. Bloody awful choice of what OP decides to write. Not poor victims or support for them, their bravery or any compassion but a scum thread of blaming the victim for putting themselves in this position. A if you did that then this wouldn't happen thread.

OP completely ignores that most women are raped by men they know, not strangers. What do facts matter when you can throw stones at other women who in the OP's opinion make themselves less safe and so might be raped. Nice one @Feedingmybaby punch down at the victims and ignore the actual people who deserve widespread condemnation the actual rapist. Sit there on your high horse and ponder. You have no idea what sexual assault or rape is like without the pathetic comments from women wo make excuses for rapists and enable others to think well they made themselves unsafe because of x y and z so it's ultimately their own fault.

I pity you and your lack of empathy. Never ever work with women who have been victims, they deserve better than your comments. Rapes are mainly done by people known to the victim not strangers in an alleyway by the way,

SouthLondonMum22 · Today 17:52

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:45

It definitely doesn’t. But if she didn’t want to consent, why not just stay at home? He obviously didn’t want to know her for her amazing personality. She shouldn’t have to have stayed at home - she should be able to parade naked all around his house without him expecting sex in an ideal world. But obviously he was going to expect sex judging by their previous encounter, so why even go?

I don’t think she’s to blame at all - the rapist is always to blame. But the level of risk there was just insane!

If you truly don't think she's to blame, there'd be no 'buts'. I imagine she wasn't completely against having sex and then either changed her mind or didn't want to do exactly what he wanted to do and obviously didn't expect him to do what he did.

I also don't know which is which but I believe one of his victims consented to sex but not anal sex and he did it anyway.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:52

PeasOff · Today 17:40

Because it's really easy to remove your vagina so someone assumes you don't have one🤦🏼‍♀️

I suspect if you replace the word ‘vulnerable’ with ‘available’ you’ll be nearer the mark as to what this poster really thinks.

PinkArt · Today 17:51

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:36

If that’s what you’ve taken from my posts then you clearly lack reading comprehension.

No, I'm not. You've made it very clear what your awful views are. It's one of the most unpleasant sets of posts I've read on here and at times that's a crowded field.
You clearly aren't going to take on board anything anyone says, so all anyone can do is hope that other women reading this thread, who recognise themselves in your descriptions, take some comfort in knowing not everyone thinks like you. You might think 'those women' chose to put themselves in danger by doing that or wearing that but thankfully there are more of us who understand that the only person whose actions are responsible for rape is the rapist.

PeasOff · Today 17:49

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:45

It definitely doesn’t. But if she didn’t want to consent, why not just stay at home? He obviously didn’t want to know her for her amazing personality. She shouldn’t have to have stayed at home - she should be able to parade naked all around his house without him expecting sex in an ideal world. But obviously he was going to expect sex judging by their previous encounter, so why even go?

I don’t think she’s to blame at all - the rapist is always to blame. But the level of risk there was just insane!

I'm pretty sure this woman was brutally anally raped which must have been horrifically painful and traumatic.

Do you think that was her expectation?

More victim blaming - you are putting the onus in her actions and not his. It's vile.

nietzscheanvibe · Today 17:48

SouthLondonMum22 · Today 17:33

Stranger rape is rare. Living with a man you know is statistically more risky than walking alone at night when it comes to the risk of rape.

I don't dispute any of that, but it doesn't address my statement that "acknowledging risk" isn't "victim-blaming" 🤷‍♂️

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:48

Dogsceptic · Today 17:39

As always, people are piling on with the ‘straw man’ argument.
Yes people get raised by boyfriends/husbands. DV /report it.
Yes people get raped by random strangers in the street - lots recently tho’ they tend not to get media coverage /report it.
The ‘grey’ area is where starstruck people, who by their own admission put their tongue in the anus of a complete stranger, whilst their best friend at the same time gives that man oral sex, pay to go to another of his gigs shortly afterwards, and then 20 years later accuse him of rape.

Edited

Doesn’t matter if it’s forty years later. It doesn’t make him any less of a scumbag and it doesn’t make it any less the case that she didn’t consent. She didn’t consent to anal sex and she didn’t consent to him removing the condom. Which by itself is treated as rape.

ThreadGuardDog · Today 17:46

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:36

If that’s what you’ve taken from my posts then you clearly lack reading comprehension.

Well if that’s the case the PP isn’t alone. There are a number of posters, including myself who find your views offensive, as are your comments around the reading comprehension of those who are calling you out.

PeasOff · Today 17:46

Dogsceptic · Today 17:39

As always, people are piling on with the ‘straw man’ argument.
Yes people get raised by boyfriends/husbands. DV /report it.
Yes people get raped by random strangers in the street - lots recently tho’ they tend not to get media coverage /report it.
The ‘grey’ area is where starstruck people, who by their own admission put their tongue in the anus of a complete stranger, whilst their best friend at the same time gives that man oral sex, pay to go to another of his gigs shortly afterwards, and then 20 years later accuse him of rape.

Edited

I take it this is about RB. Someone can consent to one sex act and say no to another making it rape if the person continues. That's how consent works.

This again, is victim blaming.

WhereAreTheTrueGreens · Today 17:45

Dogsceptic · Today 17:07

Excellent analogy.

Is it though.

People assume that walknig home alone makes a women more likely to be raped. However, the majority of rapes are not carried out by strangers but by men known to the victim.

Feedingmybaby · Today 17:45

SouthLondonMum22 · Today 17:41

Consenting once (or 5 times or 50000 times) doesn't mean that a woman always has to consent.

It definitely doesn’t. But if she didn’t want to consent, why not just stay at home? He obviously didn’t want to know her for her amazing personality. She shouldn’t have to have stayed at home - she should be able to parade naked all around his house without him expecting sex in an ideal world. But obviously he was going to expect sex judging by their previous encounter, so why even go?

I don’t think she’s to blame at all - the rapist is always to blame. But the level of risk there was just insane!

OP posts:
Pinkflamingo10 · Today 17:44

You have a point OP.
I would never say that it’s the woman’s fault because she went back to the man’s hotel room. It is the fault of the rapist.
but personally I would never go to a man’s hotel room, back in my partying days even if I kissed someone on a night out I would never go back to their house or hotel room.

Swipe left for the next trending thread