CertainSenseOfLiberty · 10/07/2026 13:29
A friend of mine is a prison visitor at a women's prison. Every time he talks about it I am shocked at the lack of safeguarding - he gets given keys on arrival and wanders to the room without a guard, he does the visiting without a guard in the room - he's radio trained so at least someone in the room can call for help if required. OK so he's never alone 1 on 1 with a prisoner but sometimes all the volunteers on that day are men.
Lexibletheflexible · Today 02:41
The issue is the procedure, not the individual. Women do report in large numbers that these types of scenarios lead to their exploitation. Sadly they don't always realise that the situation is/was exploitative and might report something like this as a consensual affair with a staff member/volunteer.
Women do report in large numbers that these types of scenarios lead to their exploitation.
This is a bold claim. Please provide evidence to support evidence of the "large numbers".
Sadly they don't always realise that the situation is/was exploitative and might report something like this as a consensual affair with a staff member/volunteer.
A similarly bold claim and somewhat surprising as I do not recall any official reports of "large numbers" of women in prison reporting that they have engaged in "a consensual affair with a staff member/volunteer."
"Large numbers" make me think "hundreds". Yet there are only about 4,000 women in prison at any one time with about 5,000 - 6,000 admissions annually (including women imprisoned on short sentences and/or remand more than once).
What is your ball-park figure for "large numbers" and how did you arrive at this estimate?
You also refer to male "staff members/volunteers". Do you mean "staff members" or are you actually referring to prison officers?
Whatever, although there is obviously under-reporting via official channels and then under-reporting of investigations and found cases in the press, HMPPS report that a very small number of prison officers have been accused of "inappropriate conduct" (1% - 3% per annum) with "sexual misconduct" forming a small subset of those cases.
There have been criminal prosecutions of a handful of cases over the past 20 years where a prison officer has engaged in "inappropriate conduct" including "sexual misconduct" with more than one prisoner.
Recent cases reported in the press involve individual female prison officers engaged in inappropriate and sexual misconduct with male prisoners (plural).
With both male and female prison officers, "inappropriate conduct" including "sexual misconduct" has been attributed primarily to:
-
recruitment and vetting issues (it is hard to recruit and retain prison officers, particularly to work in the female estate due to the additional emotional challenges of exposure to trauma and self harm which are greater in women's prisons; cursory interviewing and substandard vetting)
-
retention issues (a significant proportion of prison officers are inexperienced; most problems occur with officers who have less than 3 years experience)
-
training and supervision issues (related to persistent staff shortages)
Inexperienced male prison officers (and prison visitors) are particularly vulnerable or prone to misconduct in women's prisons. Minor boundary violations (initiated from either side) can escalate over time into gross misconduct.
The starting point for officers might be predatory in some cases but in others it might be lack of professional distancing due to over-empathising with a prisoner or susceptibility to grooming by prisoners seeking access to favours, drugs, preferential treatment, etc.
All sorts of measures are taken to ameliorate the problem of male prison officers serving in women's prisons.
IMHO that is the only truthful framing: employment of male prison officers in women's prisons is a PROBLEM.
Their presence does not, in general, benefit women prisoners so they should not be there.
They were never intended to be there and we have anti-discrimination and equalities legislation to "thank" for the abolition of the principle that only female prison officers should be employed in women's prisons.
It once was but is no more a Genuine Occupational Qualification (GOQ) for prison officers in women's prisons to be female. As with so much else with which we are familiar, the change was achieved by stealth.
Yet another instance of the road to hell being paved with good intentions:
The creation of mixed-sex prisons by stealth
There are no single sex prisons in the UK anymore.
Jo Phoenix, 25 April 2023
Extract:
Sex as a genuine occupational qualification
The issue of the placement of male prisoners who identify as women into the female prison estate brings into sharp relief the differences between men and women in terms of the crimes they commit, the links between women’s sex-based inequalities and questions of managing the risk of predatory males who may also identify as women.
For me, the remaining unanswered question is much wider: has the original need for single-sex prisons somehow disappeared over the two centuries since 1823 Gaol Act?
Admittedly, part of the justification for the 1823 Goal were highly sexist ideas of women’s fragility and corruptibility, combined with a desire to reform female prisoners according to equally sexist notions of respectability and decency. But that was only part of the justification.
The other part was a correct desire to ensure female prisoners’ safety and security and the challenges that mixed-sex prisons create vis-a-vis pregnancy, sexual harassment and sexual violence.
Perhaps it is time to return to a question about whether sex is a genuine occupational qualification when it comes to working in prisons and not just take for granted that the only problem of mixed-sex prisons is the problem of having a mixed-sex prisoner population?
Full article:
https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/creation-mixed-sex-prisons-stealth
As far as I am aware, there is no active campaign by any organisation in the UK to make women's prisons truly single-sex again.
There is a good argument advanced in the submission by @KeepPrisonsSingleSex to the Women and Equalities Select Committee Consultation on Reform of the GRA.
In this, Kate Coleman is referring to prisoners rather then prison officers when she argues for "all males" to be excluded from women's prisons under the provisions of the Gender Recognition Act 2004.
However, her reasoning applies equally well for a GOQ for female-only prison officers in women's prisons:
Written evidence submitted by Keep Prisons Single Sex [GRA0826]
6.2.3 From the perspective of the rehabilitative function of prison, we believe that the evidence demonstrates that it is a proportionate means to a legitimate aim to exclude all males in accordance with the Act.
6.3.6 We believe that evidence of female prisoners’ experiences of male violence and their vulnerability demonstrates that it is a proportionate means to a legitimate aim to exclude males in accordance with the Act.
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/16850/pdf/
From what you have said already, Lexibletheflexible, I assume that this is a campaign that you would support?
Let us just get those remaining male prisoners out of women's prisons first!