The Gender war...This didn't come from the streets

[Mmmnotsure]

Great summary/description by
Dennis Noel Kavanagh
on X as @Jebadoo2

1/ The Gender war is a class war. Trans activism was confabulated in universities where they'd run out of things to say, it was embraced by the bourgeois management types in HR and it corrupts the same in everything from unions to blue chips. This didn't come from the streets.

2/ Trans activism is indulged and has no central heroic historical point of defiance, so it steals the gay rights claim to Stonewall because at its heart, it's dreadfully aware of just how powerful and privileged it is. It's still really the only cult that can get you sacked

3/ It's the well fed goth teenage Marxist who knows where the next meal is coming from so screams "I hate you mum and dad" before stomping off to its well appointed bedroom. It's the child no one ever said "no" to and so it looks and sounds like precisely that in adversity.

4/ So often we see the low paid nurse against the well paid management or doctor. Or the most marginalised in society who have cause to actually use a rape refuge lectured by the otherwise unemployable bourgeois management class fresh from their stonewall course on pronouns.

5/ So often we see those who oppose gender ideology reliant on crowd funds and real solidarity and union ranged against the state funded, the corporate funded, the behemoth government department or indeed the actual Scottish government in the case of FWS.

6/ Trans activism lies like a fish swims from the transubstantiation sex change foundational lie the rotten edifice sits on, but the most obnoxious lie is that it is somehow marginalised or of the streets and there is nothing more contemptuous than this pretence.

7/ Trans activism routinely hires silks to vilify nurses, it cosplays protest all the time knowing the police and government will tolerate it, so it pretends to take corners on two wheels while being on guard rails. It is well fed, well appointed, well funded and comfortable.

8/ It will never match the real marginalisation of the working class nurse who needs an area to change, a female prisoner who has no choice of cell mate or the average Scottish woman fighting her own damned government. And it knows it. This, I think, is it's greatest jealousy.

The only reason why there are court cases and why the parliament needs to agree on it is because the social contract around female spaces has been broken by deluded men and their equally deluded supporters. It worked fine before that.

In what way do you qualify? Being queen means you would have to be the legitimate first born of the former king or queen.

The qualifications for being more like a man or a woman include typical behaviours.

Thank you for your 'legal' opinion. For what it's worth.

To qualify being a woman means you need to have the sort of body that developed to produce eggs. In what way does any man qualify for being a woman irrespective of his "consumerist" choices?

https://girlpowermarketing.com/statistics-purchasing-power-women/

I qualify to be queen the same way a man qualifies to be a woman. It’s an inherent knowing, a sense I was always meant to be a queen. So why are their feelings valid and not mine?

It wasn't only consumerist choices. As I mentioned special interests (like hobbies, activities), & life choices (like employment) are also included.

A link to a site called "girlpowermarketing". Marketing eh, would they still buy these things at higher rates without marketing?

Choice of employment makes you a woman or man? Are we back in 1950?

Ahhh so you believe consumerist choices are purely based on 'brain washing' the programable robots aka 'women'? They aren't capable of autonomous decisions like men hence the difference? Hmmmm?

According to @Gretel346 yes

So if I like F1 am I a man?

Way to tell us you haven't read or comprehended all the previous relevant comments without telling us.

Your consumer choices don't change your sex. I'm in a job that was historically male dominated and still was at the time I first started, this doesn't mean I'm a man.

No. I very much like F1 but have more in common with women's typical interests because of a balance of interests.

From the link provided:

Women purchase over 50% of traditional male products, including automobiles, home improvement products, and consumer electronics.

So consumerist choices are blurred...

Noone is suggesting one common interest makes you the opposite sex.

I have read and comprehended the previous comments, even with my woman brain.

You think that choice of employment has some bearing on your gender. That's utter bollocks and you know it.

So, instead of the much hyped "genital inspections" to enter female only spaces transwomen could just bring their latest credit card statements along to show their consumerist choices as proof why they should be allowed in?

On the contrary, you have not comprehended anything.

Nothing ever makes anyone the opposite sex. You either have a sperm producing body type or an egg producing one, everything else is personality.

I think he uses the phrase ‘from the streets’ to illustrate how pro-trans fans seem to think trans is some bottom up movement of the most oppressed and marginalized people. Hence they can see a physically big male doctor bullying an older, physically small female nurse, and be sad with sympathy for the poor vulnerable doctor whilst angry with the mean, oppressor nurse.

"Women's typical interests". This is outdated sexist nonsense.

Unless you include fanny ping pong, clitoral piercing and giving birth. Woman are really interested in those things.

But who are they buying for is the question. I purchase the majority of products for the household but I don't necessarily use them all. What I have in common with most women is I'm CEO of buying for the home.

Excellent. Your'e almost there in that you get to decide what qualifies as a man or woman to you.