Would they welcome contact from a random mumsnetter, because if so I could add it to a list of bullet points around possible ET panel member, possible issues in DU's work timeline, possible additional 'plaster room in socks' issues that I have put together. Basically a brief set of issues that may vaguely possibly be relevant in the event of appeal or (in extremis) a repeat ET-hearing. But so far I have been far too embarassed to even think too long about sending it to anyone, and I wouldn't discuss the most farfetched of the thoughts on here because it wouldn't be appropriate or fair to those involved.
Part of me thinks that nothing I could ever do or say could be as ridiculous as what has happened so far - and there may be a tiny nugget of relevance in the odd thing on the list.
Mostly I am thinking no, dont waste their time, they need and deserve a break from random nutters commenting on the case.
As a related aside, if @anyolddinosaur and anyone else involved in the Victoria Planning Documents/Dr Upton's treasure map discussions from Feb July is still around there is a bit more I would like to say on here about that.