Kelly v Leonardo Employment Tribunal 29th September 10am

[ickky]

Hello

Don't know much about this case other than Naomi Cunningham is representing Ms Kelly.

If you want to observe send an email to

[email protected]

Subject line

Ms BM Kelly v Leonardo UK Limited Employment Tribunal – hearing Case number: 8001497/2024

Ask for the link and pin to observe.

State you are a member of the public and give your full name and the email address you will use to access the tribunal.

Anyone interested?

Ive had to turn volume up very high. All the way up to 11

You’re in?? I’m still WFTCHTJ.
But, if i won, i’ll take it.

All the way?

Ooh, we get to see a different side of the wonderful NC , Although not the J.

So echoey, can anyone understand what the first speaker is saying? NC is clearer, though.

A few options.

Sounds like it's being held in a public lav.

Sound quality is awful. Are they in a public bathroom? :-(

Scratch that. I’m in.

From TT

We begin.
Sound is poor.
dates being discussed,
J - chance to look at drawings, they don't have a scale, something for parties to consider that distances aren't clear.

Bugger one of those was the one with a spelling mistake. Here's a replacement

Also looks like it's being held in a drawing room of fading glory.

Does anyone have a different way into nitter than the usual nitternet or nitterpoast as I can't seem to get access via either? I think there were more ways for the Peggie tribunal.

A few options.

Ooh now let us guess - do we see two women and a child in the picture, or a woman, a bloke and a child? I think we should be told.

From TT

J - can be measured for tomorrow?
J - pages issues is solved. I'll circle back to dates, what is the position on ACAs code, still insisting uppon?
NC - yes
J - in the amendment?
NC - yes
J - that's the specification of that? Changes of claim, lets look

Why why why can't they sort the bloody sound out for these things.

No idea who is talking, and the different view set up is frying my head.

This is going to be painful

Is that the Judge’s voice i can hear?

From TT

ST - no opposition in principle to amendments but may mean further enquiries if something unexpected arises.
dont know how long that will take, would need to be before C finishes.
J - bring any issues of the timetable to my attention.
ST - think C's evidence should be dealt with

I think it is a female judge, and female counsel for Leonardo, and the lovely NC for the claimant. But of course, I may just be pushing my cis heteronormative views on them

From TT

today.
J -
NC - no application from claimant side. one tiny point. para15a dropped off, talking about labeling of doc
J - inferred no intention to adjust
ST - don't think it's of assistance. On the timetable, lets go through today. Just one R witness.
NC - has that changed?

Crikey this is going to be tough to follow. I think the camera is pointing directly at the witness though. Will be interesting. Shame we can't see the respondent's counsel though

I have emailed about the sound quality and the camera angle, making it hard to follow. The witness is front and centre though, which is nice.

terrible sound and vision but v glad to be here

Is Charlotte Elves NC’s junior for this hearing?

Same.

@BoiledBeetle and AI are so clever. Even got Dr Upton on the right.