Macrons to offer 'scientific' court evidence to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says

[SerendipityJane]

Quite unsettling it has to go this far.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg3llj5nxdo

Except you can doctor a DNA report if you have the financial means to do so.

You can’t go back and create evidence that Brigette was born female.

I actually don’t care. I saw a video about this so long ago. I am yet to see any evidence that she’s not a man. Not one photo of her posing in a hospital bed after having given birth has been released.

Brigitte is a sexual predator. She is also an abuser who was caught on camera assaulting her husband on a plane.

As I say, it's a cognitive ability most of us learn as babies, so I'm sorry that this is something you find difficult, as it's quite unusual to be unable to.

Don’t be patronising. I didn’t say I have difficulty distinguishing men from women in the majority of cases. I’m just saying I’m not confident I can always tell ESPECIALLY in cases where people have gone to great lengths to change their appearance. I have also been misgendered on a number of occasions so it is clear to me that people cannot ALWAYS tell. Also I have seen enough threads on here and elsewhere online where other people get it wrong to know that I am not that unusual.

I very much doubt there's any truth in these allegations, or that many people take them very seriously.

If they're prepared to throw money at this then I could easily imagine that DNA testing could be carried out with an independent observer, or even an observer paid to further the interests of Ms Owens, involved at all stages of the process in a way that'd make the results more or less irrefutable.

Jean micheal trogenux appeared in court?!

Well yes that’s that box ticked then. And proves she’s not a man then (that is the brother in question).

Thankyou.

Still though where is her life?! This isn’t only wild conspiracy theorists trying to find her early life. Normal journalists and bibliographers also commented it was blank.

Jeez. You might not have a problem carrying round a card to "prove you're a woman" but ...no.
You can't see a problem with that?!
How do they get that proof? Examined? By who? Every woman has to go to the doctor for it, or what? As if they don't have enough to do, aren't stretched enough.
Also what happened to "we can always tell?!"
Shows what a load of horse shit that statement actually is.
Or is it just "collateral damage" like I've seen said on here before?!

You are aware how old her children are? They were born before the advent of digital photography ( just like my children); and why would the family have any reason to show or share family snaps with the public? Her children were born before she became a public figure.

What about women who can't have kids, or don't want them? Would it be as easy for them? I've given birth more than once, why should my proof be more than someone else's

Omg I must be a man! Four babies and not one photo of me in hospital with a baby.

I assume BM is a similar age to me and we didn't take photos all the time back when my children were born. I don't think any of us realised it meant we were men particularly with leaking breasts and sore stitches.

I have no idea if she is a man although it seems unlikely but a photograph in the maternity ward doesn't seem terribly relevant.

People are muddling up and confusing all sorts of information and issues that are floating around in the social media sphere.

Aristocracy did. When you're the only one in the family who didn't have a litany of various photos taken at the most important milestones as every other sibling of yours clearly did that is one question that would at least be worth asking as it would be rather odd as to why not?

Unfortunately I'm not aristocracy and BM isn't either so not sure what that has to do with anything.

Not one photo of her posing in a hospital bed after having given birth has been released

Oh well, that's it then.
Must be a man. 🙄🤣(sarcasm)
Not sure if there's one of me either.

Hear hear!
Same

He came from money all his siblings had all the milestones of their life photographed yet nothing whatsoever of it's photos , fine it happens, but why, evidence is overwhelming its male. Look that's fine each to their own, it's not a criticism, you just look silly when the evidence is clearly there and your still claiming it's not and it's a Female

The batshittery on display on this thread is <chef’s kiss>

Truly, you are spoiling us

You're wafting again, who knows why as your not disputing any evidence are you?

It might not have been anything more than a normal 'favourite teacher's relationship until he was older. I thought he was 17 when they got together?

I have an ex who had a sexual relationship with his (female) drama teacher when he was 16.

It’s weird and creepy though isn’t it? Everyone immediately recognises it’s weird and creepy when it’s 37 year old male teacher with a 16 year old girl.

‘Evidence’

🤣

There would be hospital records for all her pregnancies surely.

Brigitte's brother is happily making macarons (not to be confused with macrons) in Amiens.

Or me. Plus some people when they're young don't like having theor photo taken.

So his family took photos, obviously years later for photos of him, so her family not doing it proves what?

Just to clarify as you obviously missed it but I don't know if she is a man or a woman but lack of photos proves nothing. You'd be hard pressed to find photos of me as a baby, child or young adult

You actually have not presented one single piece of evidence that BM is male. Let us say that there is a suspicious lack of photographic evidence of BM's early life and accept that there is some sort of cover up - that in itself could be due to reasons other than she is a male. Maybe she is adopted? Maybe she is an alien? Maybe she is a werewolf who couldnt shift into human mode until she married dear Emmanuel?