Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose

993 replies

fromorbit · 28/08/2025 09:10

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:

Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times. They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Sarah Phillimore

Because I don’t tweet as a public body, an employer or provider of goods or services. I am not subject to the Equality Act. I tweet as a private individual and I will say again. You can’t change sex. A man cannot be a woman. I cannot be compelled to call a man a woman.

A trans identifying man such as ‘Kate’ who frequently takes to the public stage to urge violence against women and declare his intent to enter women’s spaces, is a dangerous man and one who will attract public comment.

Follow the fun on X
https://x.com/SVPhillimore

Here we are now: Entertain us

I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us

OP posts:
Thread gallery
75
murasaki · 05/09/2025 11:14

MarieDeGournay · 05/09/2025 11:09

I never heard of Sarah Phillimore [I checked, that's the correct spelling of her name] before all this, and it's wonderful to discover yet another fearless, eloquent, knowledgeable articulate woman on the GC sideSmile

There are so many. Compared to the foot stamping gurning toddlers the GI side produces.

SerendipityJane · 05/09/2025 11:23

DrBlackbird · 05/09/2025 08:48

Is there a term for legal mansplaining? The law bits were interesting but the sanctimonious ‘it’s only polite to call people what they want to be called’ shows up how spectacularly uninformed this bloke is on an key issue affecting women’s rights.

I can't afford to discard tools because I don't like their design ....

AnSolas · 05/09/2025 11:28

DrudgeJedd · 05/09/2025 10:27

He's referring to a JKR tweet about him from ages ago, obviously hit a nerve

Must have done to have kept a copy.

Can you imagine the cross if it was used as evidence?
🙊🙈🙊🙊🙊🤣🤣🤣🤣

Helleofabore · 05/09/2025 11:36

MarieDeGournay · 05/09/2025 11:09

I never heard of Sarah Phillimore [I checked, that's the correct spelling of her name] before all this, and it's wonderful to discover yet another fearless, eloquent, knowledgeable articulate woman on the GC sideSmile

She used to be an occasional mn’er.

MarieDeGournay · 05/09/2025 11:40

Helleofabore · 05/09/2025 11:36

She used to be an occasional mn’er.

FiguresWink

DrBlackbird · 05/09/2025 11:58

SerendipityJane · 05/09/2025 11:23

I can't afford to discard tools because I don't like their design ....

Fair enough @SerendipityJane and my comment meant no disrespect to your post. I’m inundated with pronouns and being kind both at work (starting meetings, badges, emails, asking students to declare theirs etc) and, unfortunately, at home.

So my comment is a reaction to this barrister annoyingly also perpetuating the implication that nice respectful people use preferred pronouns without thinking through what doing so actually means. The subtext being if you don’t, you’re a meany. Possibly he means like SP.

The rest was interesting from a legal perspective so I appreciate the link as well as an example of how deep and widespread #bekind has been embedded.

lcakethereforeIam · 05/09/2025 12:03

I didn't realise he'd actually said 'anal leakage'! I thought it was a speech to text fail 😅

SionnachRuadh · 05/09/2025 12:08

lcakethereforeIam · 05/09/2025 12:03

I didn't realise he'd actually said 'anal leakage'! I thought it was a speech to text fail 😅

Back in the day when the SWP owned a print shop, for several years they printed Militant, and there used to be a competition going to see who could get the most absurd reader's letter printed in Militant.

"I used to be a Conservative voter, but one night I bought a saveloy and chips wrapped in a copy of Militant, and as I was walking home eating my tasty dinner, I read Peter Taaffe's column on the British Crisis, and I suddenly realised that we need to nationalise the top 200 monopolies"

It would be terribly naughty for anyone to prank Jolyon in this way.

SerendipityJane · 05/09/2025 14:17

DrBlackbird · 05/09/2025 11:58

Fair enough @SerendipityJane and my comment meant no disrespect to your post. I’m inundated with pronouns and being kind both at work (starting meetings, badges, emails, asking students to declare theirs etc) and, unfortunately, at home.

So my comment is a reaction to this barrister annoyingly also perpetuating the implication that nice respectful people use preferred pronouns without thinking through what doing so actually means. The subtext being if you don’t, you’re a meany. Possibly he means like SP.

The rest was interesting from a legal perspective so I appreciate the link as well as an example of how deep and widespread #bekind has been embedded.

👋

Occasionally there are some interesting nuances pointed out, in a generally agenda-free manner.

If you want to be annoyed, his mate the BlackBeltBarrister seems a little more shrill and his videos have rather OTT titles and can safely be ignored.

I've found that most days in about 2 minutes, I can scroll through my YT feed and by reading the titles be just as informed without watching a single video. Add to that the same time just scrolling down my FB feed and a smattering of moderated USENET posts, and 10 minutes sees me newsed up for the day.

One day we'll invent a machine that could do that for us.

moto748e · 05/09/2025 14:22

One day we'll invent a machine that could do that for us

You say that like it's a good thng!

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 05/09/2025 16:51

fromorbit · 05/09/2025 08:17

The fox killer is panicking. He has put up a whiny Instagram about how evil JKR is and how is going to defy SP and go to court. Watch for some laughs.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOMFW7jjWUZ/?igsh=aXF0amx1am5hZTFp

JM the guy you are supporting is an aggressive fetishist who hates women who is so daft they were pushed out of the Scottish Greens. We kept all the receipts the song about stamping on women etc. You are up against a reasonable sounding forthright disabled female barrister who has won many cases like this. You are GOING TO LOSE!

You might be scared of JKR, but the real problem for you is behind Sarah and JKR is an army of pesky women and sensible men who can spare a few quid to take down sexist losers who target women.

Not only are you going to be humiliated in court, but your defeat is going to fuel the ongoing battle to tell everyone biology is a thing. Without your incompetence the battle to take gender nonsense would be further off track.

Has he never heard of sunscreen? He gets more and more irrational every time he posts, someone needs to tell him to stop the finger wagging too.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/09/2025 16:55

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 05/09/2025 16:51

Has he never heard of sunscreen? He gets more and more irrational every time he posts, someone needs to tell him to stop the finger wagging too.

He looks very silly in that video 😂

yourhairiswinterfire · 05/09/2025 17:39

I wonder if he jabs his finger in the faces of women he looks down on IRL the way he does when he's snarling about them on camera. Looks like his head was literally vibrating with fury at the end of that video.

The man makes my flesh crawl.

SionnachRuadh · 05/09/2025 18:01

He's spent months trying to goad JKR into suing him. #FAFO, Jolyon.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 05/09/2025 18:15

I think it's on.

GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose
GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose
fromorbit · 05/09/2025 19:05

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 05/09/2025 18:15

I think it's on.

Loving the time waiting image.

OP posts:
fromorbit · 05/09/2025 19:18

SionnachRuadh · 05/09/2025 12:08

Back in the day when the SWP owned a print shop, for several years they printed Militant, and there used to be a competition going to see who could get the most absurd reader's letter printed in Militant.

"I used to be a Conservative voter, but one night I bought a saveloy and chips wrapped in a copy of Militant, and as I was walking home eating my tasty dinner, I read Peter Taaffe's column on the British Crisis, and I suddenly realised that we need to nationalise the top 200 monopolies"

It would be terribly naughty for anyone to prank Jolyon in this way.

Hoaxing Maugham would be funny.

Maybe we could trick him into supporting some kind of fake awful abusive man who hates women and who lies about everything especially about the frequent complaints he make. Someone so outrageously terrible and unconvincing that it would make Maugham look like an absolute clown for supporting him and would destroy any legitimacy he has left. Then get him into a situation where the whole thing becomes public record so everyone could laugh at him.

Oh wait...

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/09/2025 19:46

ISWYDT

SionnachRuadh · 05/09/2025 19:51

The video worries me though. If Jolyon isn't careful he's going to harrumph himself to death.

fromorbit · 06/09/2025 09:22

Sarah Phillimore

1h
This is a very good and actually quite upsetting point. Maugham has raised a million pounds. Every penny will go to fund his ego when it could have established a dedicated service for trans identifying men facing abuse and violence.
Quote
Audrey Ludwig MBE
They could also practically fund specialist DV and homeless shelters for trans identified people. I’m hearing hard pressed charities saying we have no money for dedicated services if we exclude those few trans women (who feel unable to use male services) from women’s services.

OP posts:
OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 06/09/2025 09:35

fromorbit · 06/09/2025 09:28

Labour Pains summary of the position of the doomed legal challenges, including ones from GLP, now EHRC has submitted.

Mananadrama: the ongoing Supreme Court lawfare of five male drama queens
https://labourpainsblog.com/2025/09/05/mananadrama-the-ongoing-supreme-court-lawfare-of-five-male-drama-queens/

An excellent post!

Ereshkigalangcleg · 06/09/2025 09:41

ArabellaScott · 06/09/2025 09:35

Ooh, he's got his weird little pointy finger out. Steady on, ladies!
https://share.google/uAocIGXhAxwzLd8eQ

Honestly, what a numpty.

Is “we” the Royal We? Pretty sure the lawsuit will be against him personally.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 06/09/2025 09:47

fromorbit · 06/09/2025 09:28

Labour Pains summary of the position of the doomed legal challenges, including ones from GLP, now EHRC has submitted.

Mananadrama: the ongoing Supreme Court lawfare of five male drama queens
https://labourpainsblog.com/2025/09/05/mananadrama-the-ongoing-supreme-court-lawfare-of-five-male-drama-queens/

That is very very funny 😁