What I want to know is this - building on NC's line of questioning earlier, is this. Bear with, because none of it makes sense.
LM said she was a 'cis woman' and would be uncomfortable if a 'cis' man walked into a toilet / changing room labelled as single sex. (she went on about caring about victims of sexual violence as a reason why she couldn't go into too much detail at one point but that's incompatible with her beliefs as I'm trying to prove here).
NC then pointed out how did she know he was 'cis' gender so lots of floundering there BECAUSE YOU CAN'T TELL WHICH IS THE POINT.
However, in LM / UCU's view, if the man strips naked but then tells her he's a 'transwoman' complete with penis and balls (as 90%? of them are), will that change her discomfort? According to her trans people felt 'scared' simply being in the room with someone (SB) with GC views and this was unacceptable. Unacceptable for SB to hold (or I'm guessing even be suspected of holding) sex realist beliefs, because of the distress this will cause trans people. (no matter the distress to SB of being ostracised and labelled hateful because of her beliefs that biological sex is real and matters - which the rest of the population mostly also believes).
So if LM happened to convey any of her initial distress in her body language or facial expression, when the man she thought was 'cis' but is actually 'trans' came in and got undressed she is transphobic? And this discomfort will also - presumably - miraculously disappear once the man says he's trans?
IF all this is true - which is the only logically consistent position within her framework of beliefs - this mean the male bodied person, via his transwoman status, is more oppressed than cis LM. This means his perceptions of his gender are more important than LM's perceptions of material reality or gender or anything else really. His perceptions trump hers at all times.
So, does this mean - following to the logical conclusion (thanks for reading this far). If a male bodied convicted sex offender is placed in a woman's prison (as has and is happening). Under gender ideology, even if these convicted sex offenders rape or sexually assault a woman in prison, her perception of the material reality she's been raped and the trauma of that, are LESS IMPORTANT than the male bodied person's feelings of distress she perceives him as male (even though he's raped her with his penis)?
Which boils down to trans people's perceptions and wants trump everyone else's rights at all times.