I don’t think it’s relevant to the case, but Jo Grady has tweeted that “UCU and the trade union movement will protect and stand with trans people, whether the law cares or not.”
so not showing much intention to be law abiding.
Can’t imagine FWS making a similar statement.
Energency Demo tomorrow involving unison and unite.
She doesn’t appear to have grappled with the issues addressed by the actual judgement or the fact that the judges were simply interpreting existing legislation - even though that is where she would need to start if she genuinely had an interest in changing the law.