Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #20

1000 replies

nauticant · 16/02/2025 14:41

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It is planned that it will resume on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

However, as a result of problems with the livestreaming, apparently caused by a very large number of observers, remote public access to the hearing was suspended on Tuesday 11 February. It was suggested that it might be reinstated at some point but don't count on it.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse
Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2
Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3
Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4
Thread 5: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5
Thread 6: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269635-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-6
Thread 7: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5270365-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-7
Thread 8: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271511-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-8
Thread 9: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271596-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-9
Thread 10: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271723-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-10
Thread 11: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272046-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-11
Thread 12: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272276-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-12
Thread 13: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272398-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-13
Thread 14: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272939-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-14
Thread 15: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5273119-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-15
Thread 16: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5273636-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-16
Thread 17: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5273827-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-17
Thread 18: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5274332-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-18
Thread 19: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5274571-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-19

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
rebmacesrevda · 17/02/2025 15:26

SP story on BBC home page now (not for long!).
BBC using "the doctor" in lieu of pronouns.

CheekySnake · 17/02/2025 15:33

Bloody sniveling BBC.

'Not registered female at birth.'

Why can't they just say registered as male?
Why do they have to get 'transwoman!' in the first paragraph.
Why bury the fact that he's a bloke right at the end?
Why leave out the fact that Upton and NHS Fife failed to disclose documents that they were told to hand over before the tribunal started?
Why use that blurry photo instead of the one that clearly shows the beard under the foundation?

What is that phrase again - I must not tell lies

eatfigs · 17/02/2025 15:36

lcakethereforeIam · 17/02/2025 14:58

The Guardian has published a couple of letters about the Sonia Sodha article from, bloody hell was it only, yesterday

https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2025/feb/16/female-only-spaces-are-a-safety-issue

The first supportive, the second not so much. I'm intrigued by the note the Guardian have added about it at the end of the page

The second letter on this page was amended on 16 February 2025 to better reflect the content of the column on which it comments

It would probably turn out to be nothing much, but I can't help wondering what was changed and why they felt they had to. Especially considering they pick what letters to publish. Did they not have much choice in letters that were against the article?

That's curious. The part of the letter they've elided with "[references to sex crimes]" previously read "the implicit comparison of a trans doctor to a rapist and sex criminal".

Perhaps trying to avoid libel action?

Datun · 17/02/2025 15:36

NebulousDog · 17/02/2025 15:16

Reading through the Guardian/Observer articles upthread reminded me of something I intended to comment on last week when I spent mist of the day without a phone signal.

Chromosomes
Is it my imagination or is it just the transwomen that babble on about chromosomes and sex being a spectrum...clownfish etc?

It becomes an issue for women when there are DSD's competing as women, but doesn't really feature outside cheek-swab testing.

NC didn't really push Dr U on the chromosome "harassment", but I suspect it was a product of his "I'm not a robot" imagination.

The chromosome thing is such a wind up.

Apparently you need skilled expertise to determine peoples sex, but if you start talking about chromosomes, oh my God, the horror.

It's just bullying, plain and simple. As I said on another thread, they are utterly incoherent, but they rely on your coherence in order to leverage it to push their incoherence.

CarefulN0w · 17/02/2025 15:40

Exactly. It has been suggested Dr U wishes to become a parent. If the suggestion is true, will it be complicated for Dr U to find a woman to carry his minions?

Liverstreaming · 17/02/2025 15:47

CarefulN0w · 17/02/2025 15:40

Exactly. It has been suggested Dr U wishes to become a parent. If the suggestion is true, will it be complicated for Dr U to find a woman to carry his minions?

Dr Upton is married to a woman (and claims to be a lesbian). So no issue there.

Presumably they’ll have to toss a coin to decide which one carries the foetus to term though.

FannyCann · 17/02/2025 15:48

Seriestwo · 17/02/2025 14:00

I’m sending a post card to Sandie c/o CEO, or maybe NHS Fife’s press office.

x.com/gussiegrips/status/1891477028014112898?s=46

I just happened to have a couple of handy cards from Sex Matters.

Second card to Dr Searle. Can only upload 3 images at once.

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #20
NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #20
NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #20
Theeyeballsinthesky · 17/02/2025 15:48

Murdo Fraser will be on BBC radio Scotland later today

I will be on @BBCRadioScot #DriveTime this afternoon speaking about the @nhsfife Sandy Peggie case #IStandWithSandiePeggie

FannyCann · 17/02/2025 15:48

For Dr Searle

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #20
Waitwhat23 · 17/02/2025 15:53

rebmacesrevda · 17/02/2025 13:23

FMQs at Holyrood on Thursday is viewable online. It's about time Swinney made a stand on this.

Link to Holyrood TV if anyone interested -

https://www.scottishparliament.tv/

Waitwhat23 · 17/02/2025 15:55

Cookiepuss · 17/02/2025 14:27

I'm catching up on this again today as after seeing the update last night that Sandie was going to be hauled into a disciplinary meeting on Friday, I had to step away for the sake of my blood pressure. Unfortunately, it didn't stop me ruminating on a few things which I know have been raised/discussed on here many times.

There seems to be a lot of confusion about the terms "transwoman" and "transman". I have lost count of the number of times I have explained and when the penny drops I get the "woah didn't realise that" in response. The average person just does not understand the difference and generally think a transwoman is a biological woman preferring to be "seen as male".

Complacency - if it doesn't affect someone negatively then they pay less attention. I asked my DH what he would do if a woman was using the male toilets. His response was something along the lines of he has never experienced that and why would a woman want to set foot in the men's anyway as surely they would feel embarrassed. I asked him if it did happen would he find it uncomfortable - he agreed he would but thinks most men would point out the woman was in the wrong place, wait for them to leave and carry on. I asked what he would do if the woman stayed and insisted on using the facilities - he laughed and didn't think that was a likely scenario as surely a woman would feel intimidated/threatened surrounded by men with their genitals on display (oh, the irony)! But the first answer was that it's never happened to him so not something he would worry about = complacency.

I was really concerned to read some comments from medical professionals who admit they and their colleagues are scared of stating what is biological reality (although I fully appreciate why this is). In my view, the silence leads to people thinking if the trained, medical professionals are not speaking out and stating the facts, then it must be OK. Many people are too busy and no doubt have their own personal challenges to even give it headspace.

How the hell have we got to a position where organisations are bending over backwards to appease the delusions of a tiny minority and, in doing so are completely walking over the rights of women.

I feel quite despondent today that nobody with the power to do so is actually standing up and saying WTAF is going on here.

Finally (sorry, long post) thank you for the poems and the rewriting of Uptown Funk which made did make me laugh - genius!!

I think I may have posted this on one of the previous threads but in case anyone missed it -

https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2023/08/07/clarity-matters-how-placating-lobbyists-obscures-public-understanding-of-sex-and-gender/

Merrymouse · 17/02/2025 16:00

eatfigs · 17/02/2025 15:36

That's curious. The part of the letter they've elided with "[references to sex crimes]" previously read "the implicit comparison of a trans doctor to a rapist and sex criminal".

Perhaps trying to avoid libel action?

As far as I can see the only references to 'sex crimes' are

"Peggie says she raised her previous experiences of sexual assault to try to engender understanding, and mentioned a recent case when a male prisoner had been put in a female prison."

and

"The board’s expectation that she should tolerate mixed-sex changing facilities is clearly unlawful, and it put a survivor of sexual assault in a traumatic situation."

and

"There is a cautionary tale from across the Atlantic, where Democrats’ stubborn and unpopular defence of men’s rights to self-identify into women’s sport has dropped the unlikeliest of moral victories into President Donald Trump’s lap, allowing a man accused of serious sexual assault to somehow position himself as a defender of women’s rights."

It's not some vague entity called 'patriarchal oppression' doing the sex crimes. It's men.

standtherebicycle · 17/02/2025 16:02

CheekySnake · 17/02/2025 14:58

have a click on 'LGBTQI+' and then 'resources for protected characteristics'

www.nhsfife.org/about-us/equality-and-human-rights/protected-characteristics/

I did that. Are there resources for any of the other protected characteristics anywhere else? I couldn't find them.

CheekySnake · 17/02/2025 16:05

standtherebicycle · 17/02/2025 16:02

I did that. Are there resources for any of the other protected characteristics anywhere else? I couldn't find them.

Nope.

MarkWithaC · 17/02/2025 16:08

eatfigs · 17/02/2025 15:36

That's curious. The part of the letter they've elided with "[references to sex crimes]" previously read "the implicit comparison of a trans doctor to a rapist and sex criminal".

Perhaps trying to avoid libel action?

I read the original version of that letter. I agree the phrase 'implicit comparison of a trans doctor to a rapist and sex criminal" would have given me the twitch if I were a Guardian legal advisor, seeing as SP has said on record in the tribunal that she didn't say/couldn't even remember the details of the crime in the Isla Bryson case.
Also, 'reportedly' in 'as Sandie Peggie reportedly suggested' is doing a lot of heavy lifting, isn't it?

RethinkingLife · 17/02/2025 16:11

Many will know Rhona Hotchkiss as a current director of JKR's Beira's Place. RH also made some excellent contributions about prisons from her time as a Prison Governor.

1/7 Some thoughts on the culpability of the NHS Fife Board in the current debacle. The Board Non-Exec Directors are not employees, they cannot be sacked, only asked by ScotGov to stand down. They sit 4-6 days a month on the Board & are remunerated at around 9k/year

2/7 The Board would not usually be aware of Individual Tribunal/ processes taking place - probably around 4-5 a year for a Board with 10k employees. They should be made aware of any process that could present a reputational or financial risk to NHS Fife though.

3/7 Day to day employment issues are ‘Operational’ as opposed to ‘Strategic’ which is the Board’s area of interest/ influence. However, the progress & details of this Tribunal should now be known to them & being discussed by them.

4/7 Board meetings & minutes thereof are made public. There is no requirement for an HR Director to sit as an Executive Director on NHS Boards. There is no requirement for the Nurse Director to sit on the Board, only the Directors of Medicine, Public Health and the Chief Exec.

5/7 NHS Fife’s website has a section on ‘Protected Characteristics’, the resources listed relate to LGBTQI+ & all of them orgs that are about or focus on the TQI plus. Many of those orgs provide inaccurate information about Equality Law. The Board should have spotted this

6/7 One part of the website is laughably out of date - under Equality & Human Rights, they say “Marriage is defined as a union between a man & a woman” only CP is available to same-sex couples. Someone on the Board should have spotted this

6/7 [sic] All of this points to an organisation guilty of seeking only biased/ partial advice on contentious issues & failing to pay attention to relevant Tribunal & Court judgements in relation to employees. This is most definitely a Board matter

x.com/HotchkissRhona/status/1891471288012587474

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 17/02/2025 16:12

Mollyollydolly · 16/02/2025 22:35

The hospital address is
Sandie Peggie
Victoria Hospital
Hayfield Road
Kirkcaldy KY2 5AH

I'm sending her a good luck card to that address. Feel a bit helpless, just want to show support and show them they're bullying dickheads.

I've sent her a card of support at that address too. This is really unusual for me. I generally don't get round to doing anything.

Mmmnotsure · 17/02/2025 16:14

I haven't sent a postcard in yonks.
Enjoyed sending one today.

mrshoho · 17/02/2025 16:19

Liverstreaming · 17/02/2025 15:47

Dr Upton is married to a woman (and claims to be a lesbian). So no issue there.

Presumably they’ll have to toss a coin to decide which one carries the foetus to term though.

Edited

I suppose as BU is most definitely and unquestionably a biological female there is no way on this green earth that BU will be providing the sperms to make the said baby.

Waitwhat23 · 17/02/2025 16:23

I'm sending a postcard too. Would love to send this on a postcard (by Wheeshtcraft on Twitter) but will restrain myself!

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #20
TriesNotToBeCynical · 17/02/2025 16:24

NebulousDog · 17/02/2025 15:16

Reading through the Guardian/Observer articles upthread reminded me of something I intended to comment on last week when I spent mist of the day without a phone signal.

Chromosomes
Is it my imagination or is it just the transwomen that babble on about chromosomes and sex being a spectrum...clownfish etc?

It becomes an issue for women when there are DSD's competing as women, but doesn't really feature outside cheek-swab testing.

NC didn't really push Dr U on the chromosome "harassment", but I suspect it was a product of his "I'm not a robot" imagination.

Chromosomes are not definitive as to sex at birth. Annoyingly complicated, but true.

NecessaryScene · 17/02/2025 16:25

Chromosomes are not definitive as to sex at birth. Annoyingly complicated, but true.

Yes they are - there's no other factors like incubation temperature or mother's hormone levels involved.

They way they are definitive might be complicated - not as simple as XX/XY in DSD edge cases - but they are definitive.

snickersbarchild · 17/02/2025 16:28

Cookiepuss · 17/02/2025 14:27

I'm catching up on this again today as after seeing the update last night that Sandie was going to be hauled into a disciplinary meeting on Friday, I had to step away for the sake of my blood pressure. Unfortunately, it didn't stop me ruminating on a few things which I know have been raised/discussed on here many times.

There seems to be a lot of confusion about the terms "transwoman" and "transman". I have lost count of the number of times I have explained and when the penny drops I get the "woah didn't realise that" in response. The average person just does not understand the difference and generally think a transwoman is a biological woman preferring to be "seen as male".

Complacency - if it doesn't affect someone negatively then they pay less attention. I asked my DH what he would do if a woman was using the male toilets. His response was something along the lines of he has never experienced that and why would a woman want to set foot in the men's anyway as surely they would feel embarrassed. I asked him if it did happen would he find it uncomfortable - he agreed he would but thinks most men would point out the woman was in the wrong place, wait for them to leave and carry on. I asked what he would do if the woman stayed and insisted on using the facilities - he laughed and didn't think that was a likely scenario as surely a woman would feel intimidated/threatened surrounded by men with their genitals on display (oh, the irony)! But the first answer was that it's never happened to him so not something he would worry about = complacency.

I was really concerned to read some comments from medical professionals who admit they and their colleagues are scared of stating what is biological reality (although I fully appreciate why this is). In my view, the silence leads to people thinking if the trained, medical professionals are not speaking out and stating the facts, then it must be OK. Many people are too busy and no doubt have their own personal challenges to even give it headspace.

How the hell have we got to a position where organisations are bending over backwards to appease the delusions of a tiny minority and, in doing so are completely walking over the rights of women.

I feel quite despondent today that nobody with the power to do so is actually standing up and saying WTAF is going on here.

Finally (sorry, long post) thank you for the poems and the rewriting of Uptown Funk which made did make me laugh - genius!!

Perhaps the song itself should be renamed 'Upton Junk'?

Merrymouse · 17/02/2025 16:33

standtherebicycle · 17/02/2025 16:02

I did that. Are there resources for any of the other protected characteristics anywhere else? I couldn't find them.

Not that I could find.

They seem to have input from outside agencies for Gender Reassignment and Sexual Orientation - there are links to Fife Rape and Assault centre under Sexual Orientation (not clear why this would be the only link) and the whole page of LGBT resources under Gender Reassignment.

Interestingly the Fife NHS definition of Gender Reassignment is “The process of transitioning from one gender to another gender. This does not have to include any medical treatment, but could simply refer to somebody asking for a new name and pronouns to be used to for them.” (As defined by the Equality and Human Rights Commission)

However, that quote isn't on this ECHR page, which just refers to the Equality Act.

www.equalityhumanrights.com/equality/equality-act-2010/your-rights-under-equality-act-2010/gender-reassignment-discrimination

For everything else, its a few lines of badly edited copy.

To be fair, perhaps the person who created the page is under resourced and did their best. But you can see how they got into a mess.

GrumpyMenopausalWombWielder · 17/02/2025 16:34

https://x.com/ginadavidsonlbc/status/1891523404747907496?s=46

Spineless weasel of a man.

😡

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.