Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Kellie-Jay's New Political Party

1000 replies

TheBadLuckOfTeelaBrown · 07/12/2022 13:34

I can't see a thread on this, but she is starting a new party and will run in elections.

twitter.com/StandingforXX/status/1600235830475653123?s=20&t=hhlXpo7uErB4FlkFj1nSRA

www.theotherparty.co.uk

OP posts:
Thread gallery
41
BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:16

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:14

Give over a head scarf doesn’t restrict movement and you’re the one making it all about sex. Honestly, did you get your information about Islam from the EDL and HoO webpages? Oh, wait no you got it from KJK who is parroting their stuff….but she doesn’t know who they are or anything about them despite spending hours hanging out with key members, and praising them on SM.

You’ve never given any thought to why some extreme forms of religion mandate covering up for women and girls? You don’t think there’s any room for feminist analysis there? That anyone saying ‘hang on a minute’ is simply prejudiced? For serious?

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:17

beastlyslumber · 09/12/2022 11:15

Oh I've seen them all before. The same things that you endlessly recycle on these threads.

It's all you've got, I know. Let's hope that KJK gets on Joe Rogan next. That will give you something else to froth about. New links to articles saying that KJK is a fascist for talking to someone who is not a fascist! It will be fun.

No, this is my first thread on KJK so the links are all new. But thanks for confessing you didn’t even click on them and yet felt free to LIE and say they are not evidence.

beastlyslumber · 09/12/2022 11:17

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:15

Why do you care? It’s obvious your standards are at the bottom of a mind shaft and any critical thinking is poo poo’d as engaging in purity politics.

A mind shaft? lol

Oh can you do critical thinking? That would be great! Try answering the question then. That would be a demonstration of these critical thinking skills you claim to have. Looking forward to it!

beastlyslumber · 09/12/2022 11:18

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:17

No, this is my first thread on KJK so the links are all new. But thanks for confessing you didn’t even click on them and yet felt free to LIE and say they are not evidence.

Hahahaha

Please. I've seen everything you lot have got a hundred times over.

OldCrone · 09/12/2022 11:19

I have spoken to left wing feminists like myself many times on the issue, and the overwhelming response is they see the concern but they are concerned about being on the wrong side of history.

Are you saying that they're more concerned about how they might look to someone in the future (after they're dead) than they are about children being harmed here and now?

Do they not think that these hypothetical people in the future might look at them and think "Why the fuck were all these self-righteous people worrying how they would look if they said 'men are not women' and ignoring massive holes in child safeguarding and enormous harm done to women and children"?

Do they really think that the 'right side of history' is going to be the one that advocated for mutilating and sterilising children? If so, they're the ones who need to get out of their purity spiralling echo chamber.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:19

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:15

Why do you care? It’s obvious your standards are at the bottom of a mind shaft and any critical thinking is poo poo’d as engaging in purity politics.

You can’t answer then

gotcha

HappinessAlley · 09/12/2022 11:20

Isn't the simple point that JB debated Milo?

Namochang · 09/12/2022 11:21

Just leaving this here again for those who were unable to read it last time.

jeanhatchet.blogspot.com/2019/01/why-i-wont-be-standing-for-women.html?m=1

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:21

HappinessAlley · 09/12/2022 11:20

Isn't the simple point that JB debated Milo?

watch KJK on Benjamin Boyce

does she agree with everything he says?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/12/2022 11:21

I'm not concerned about being on the wrong side of history because all this is batshit and fundamentally an attack on women's rights and reality itself, so I guess I should hand in my "left wing feminist" card.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:22

Namochang · 09/12/2022 11:21

Just leaving this here again for those who were unable to read it last time.

jeanhatchet.blogspot.com/2019/01/why-i-wont-be-standing-for-women.html?m=1

Mmm, jean’s weird vitriol just gets more convincing with repetition 👍

OldCrone · 09/12/2022 11:22

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 10:53

I’m not obsessed with toilets. KJK is so obsessed with toilets she thinks it’s more important than the right to a legal abortion.

Can you post a link to where she said that? Thanks.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/12/2022 11:22

Jean hasn't exactly covered herself in glory over this.

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:23

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:16

You’ve never given any thought to why some extreme forms of religion mandate covering up for women and girls? You don’t think there’s any room for feminist analysis there? That anyone saying ‘hang on a minute’ is simply prejudiced? For serious?

Really, Islam isn’t an “extreme form of religion” any more than any other world religion.

But KJK didn’t ask for ‘feminist analysis’ or say ‘hang on a minute’.

She guessed the age of some girls as 7 (which is an assumption) and said For Fucks Sake, Disgusting, Sexist, and told the school to Sort it Out.

Kellie-Jay's New Political Party
AlisonDonut · 09/12/2022 11:24

HappinessAlley · 09/12/2022 10:56

No-one on this thread has argued against any of those points. Why would they?

It's a pretty simple argument really, it's been reiterated several times, and it's a moral dilemma for everyone to make their own choice. No-one is right or wrong.

So what is it you meant when you said we needed convincing of? Or about?

Please explain what you meant. Thanks.

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:24

OldCrone · 09/12/2022 11:22

Can you post a link to where she said that? Thanks.

It’s been posted FOUR TIMES on this thread in link and screenshot forms.

Namochang · 09/12/2022 11:29

OldCrone · 09/12/2022 11:19

I have spoken to left wing feminists like myself many times on the issue, and the overwhelming response is they see the concern but they are concerned about being on the wrong side of history.

Are you saying that they're more concerned about how they might look to someone in the future (after they're dead) than they are about children being harmed here and now?

Do they not think that these hypothetical people in the future might look at them and think "Why the fuck were all these self-righteous people worrying how they would look if they said 'men are not women' and ignoring massive holes in child safeguarding and enormous harm done to women and children"?

Do they really think that the 'right side of history' is going to be the one that advocated for mutilating and sterilising children? If so, they're the ones who need to get out of their purity spiralling echo chamber.

I think their hesitance is a lot more complex of that. And they worry thinking back to the fight against gay rights. That it was ‘harming children’ obviously we know that was wrong and of course being gay didn’t harm anyone. I think they’re drawn in by the mental health aspect, and how difficult it can be for those with gender dysphoria.
I think lots of women find it tough, as we’re conditioned to be nice and the nice thing to do is to say ‘of course these people are trans and they feel this way and they need to be given all the support’. I do think lots of them understand the issue and the dangers of issuing hormones and especially about the men in women’s prisons/sports/changing rooms. I think it’s something where we really need more high profile left wingers to step up and say their concerns.
The only people talking about this issue seem to be on the right side, including news agencies so it makes left wingers feel it’s not ‘their side’. I know a few of my friends would come on board if they felt someone gave them a voice, I think that voice being KJK is going to have the opposite effect on them though.
The problem is this really isn’t a black and white debate. Everyone knows you can’t change sex, everyone knows that giving drugs or surgery to kids is a bad idea, and everyone knows biological disadvantages mean sex segregation is necessarily in cases. But on the flip side there’s the mental health effects etc. The problem is the discussion seems to have gone with a sharp red line down the middle and you’re either a TRA or a TERF, and that’s making it tough.

Sorry, gone off on a tangent.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:29

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:23

Really, Islam isn’t an “extreme form of religion” any more than any other world religion.

But KJK didn’t ask for ‘feminist analysis’ or say ‘hang on a minute’.

She guessed the age of some girls as 7 (which is an assumption) and said For Fucks Sake, Disgusting, Sexist, and told the school to Sort it Out.

covering up little girls is extreme. My Muslim neighbours don’t do it

i had a stand up row with Posie as she then was on here about that tweet

she advocated excluding the girls from school if wearing head coverings

I felt that penalising girls because their parents buy into sexist claptrap is wrong

we both agreed that mandating covering the heads of little girls in public is wrong

see I’m capable of agreeing with someone about some things, disagreeing about others and not thinking they’re the devil

it’s like I’ve got magic fucking powers or something

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/12/2022 11:29

She guessed the age of some girls as 7 (which is an assumption) and said For Fucks Sake, Disgusting, Sexist, and told the school to Sort it Out.

And? I'm sure she can tell roughly how old children are, she has several of her own.

Onnabugeisha · 09/12/2022 11:31

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/12/2022 11:21

I'm not concerned about being on the wrong side of history because all this is batshit and fundamentally an attack on women's rights and reality itself, so I guess I should hand in my "left wing feminist" card.

KJK did long ago. She did a reboot rant in which she rants about left wing women and how apparently they only hate her because she grew up working class (lol) and then waxes eloquent about how great right wing women are.

Which is fine…she’s right wing..nothing wrong with being right wing. But then she rants about no one knows what far right is or what a Nazi is and said she’s willing to ‘stand beside the Devil himself’ to get “her message out” and then pretends she has no idea who Hearts of Oak are despite hanging out repeatedly with fellow Swindonian and darling of HoO, Carl Benjamin.

Reboot of ENTIRE rant "Right Women Are Women"
m.youtube.com/watch?v=RZWu2iODryU

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/12/2022 11:32

she advocated excluding the girls from school if wearing head coverings

I felt that penalising girls because their parents buy into sexist claptrap is wrong

we both agreed that mandating covering the heads of little girls in public is wrong

see I’m capable of agreeing with someone about some things, disagreeing about others and not thinking they’re the devil

it’s like I’ve got magic fucking powers or something

Yes, I'm with you on point one, and with both of you on point two. But I'm sure the fact that you even spoke to her marks you out as a wrong'un.

OldCrone · 09/12/2022 11:33

Namochang · 08/12/2022 21:08

I admire what she’s doing however I can see this ending very badly for the gender critical movement.
The fact she has a very shady history of working with the far right (including those apposing abortion and contraception) will have her ‘pro women’ message invalidated in many minds.
Ive thought about this and I know the saying ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ but actually that square can’t circle here. As our ‘enemy’ is the ideology harming women, their ‘enemy’ is progression.
Tough one, hope it ends well with the message getting across and MPs having to answer questions they avoid, but I can see this going south sadly.
Julie Bindle would have been excellent.

Onnabugeisha · Today 11:10

the fact that the behaviour I deplore in KJK is perfectly fine when exhibited by Julie Bindel. None of us who have concerns about KJK have said anything nice or otherwise about JB. That’s just you engaging in whataboutery and is refusing to take the bait. That’s why our response has been this thread is about KJK not JB.

See quoted post above. This is why Julie Bindel was brought into the discussion.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:33

Cor

you know so much more about Posie’s output than I do

she gets a lot of space in your head

beastlyslumber · 09/12/2022 11:34

Hahaha okay brilliant, thanks for posting that awesome rant. I loved what she said in that video. The fact that you post it as some kind of proof of KJK's badness is hilarious. She takes you people apart in that video.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 09/12/2022 11:35

I'm sure the fact that you even spoke to her marks you out as a wrong'un.

<checks self for horns and other signs of being associated with the shady far right>

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.