Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Hospital refuses to operate after woman requests all-female care

917 replies

Imnobody4 · 19/10/2022 17:06

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11316141/Hospital-bans-sex-assault-victim-op-female-care-request.html

I feel quite sick at this.

She was stunned then to receive an email from the hospital's chief executive Maxine Estop Green telling her the operation was off.

She told her the hospital 'did not share her beliefs' and she should make alternative arrangements for her surgery.

The message added the hospital was committed to protecting staff from what it described as 'unacceptable distress'.

Emma urged them to reconsider, adding in a further message she thought they had misunderstood her requests, which she said were entirely within the law.

The hospital said it would offer a private room but would NOT facilitate her requests for single-sex care after her operation.

It also mentioned her comment about pronouns and said it had a responsibility to protect staff from 'discrimination and harassment'.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 22/10/2022 18:37

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

She did. It was a private hospital.

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:40

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 22/10/2022 18:37

She did. It was a private hospital.

Even if Hospital being paid, no obligation for them to oblige

RufustheFloralmissingreindeer · 22/10/2022 18:50

Oh good lord 😀

TheClogLady · 22/10/2022 18:57

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:40

Even if Hospital being paid, no obligation for them to oblige

But there is a legal obligation not to discriminate on the basis of a protected belief.

StrangeLookingParasite · 22/10/2022 19:05

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

Oh for fucking fuck's sake.

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 19:12

TheClogLady · 22/10/2022 18:57

But there is a legal obligation not to discriminate on the basis of a protected belief.

It's not a protected belief

TheClogLady · 22/10/2022 19:14

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 19:12

It's not a protected belief

What isn’t?

VestofAbsurdity · 22/10/2022 19:18

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.

You might want to commit this quote to memory @hotdiggetydog it would be useful for you.

beastlyslumber · 22/10/2022 19:20

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

God give me strength.

What are you, then? Stupid, a misogynist, or both?

oviraptor21 · 22/10/2022 19:21

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 19:12

It's not a protected belief

Says someone who clearly has not been following the last year or so of tribunal rulings.

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 19:22

Sorry for the errors

SelfPortraitWithFoxInSmokingJacket · 22/10/2022 20:09

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

Actual LOL.

ApocalipstickNow · 22/10/2022 21:49

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 22/10/2022 18:37

She did. It was a private hospital.

Maybe Super Private?

DewinDwl · 22/10/2022 22:21

hotdiggetydog · 22/10/2022 18:35

She should go private if she wants a bespoke arrangement

Oh fuck here we go again 😆

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 22/10/2022 23:02

More irony from Montgomerie.

Text for those using screenreaders:

Easy to stand and hold a sign calling to take people's healthcare away in front of someone you know won't hurt you and has no power over you.

Hospital refuses to operate after woman  requests all-female care
Coyoacan · 23/10/2022 02:46

hotdiggetydog Apart from the fact that the hospital in question is private, are only wealthy people entitled to be treated with respect in your world?

DaughterofDawn · 23/10/2022 03:46

RoyalCorgi · 19/10/2022 17:43

I wonder if this is one of Billy Bragg's examples of free speech having consequences. The consequence being that a hospital can let you die because you have the wrong opinions.

so so true.

Redebs · 23/10/2022 04:47

There is a specific example in the text of the Equality Act that explains the provision of services to women victims of sexual assault can exclude 'transwomen'.

The act specifical recognises that vulnerable women can be harmed by having 'transwomen' present in therapeutic environments.

DdraigGoch · 23/10/2022 09:29

Rightsraptor · 21/10/2022 21:56

Well now @PurgatoryOfPotholes , isn't that the most interesting Twitter thread you've posted there.

How long will any institution, a hospital anything else, keep up their TWAW nonsense when financial reality bites?

Go woke, go broke.

BordoisAgain · 23/10/2022 10:03

There's a video on twitter showing an anaesthetist orally raping a woman in the middle of her fucking c-section.

But women are wrong to be wary of men whilst in hospital 🙄

334bu · 23/10/2022 10:14

OMG!

nilsmousehammer · 23/10/2022 10:16

BordoisAgain · 23/10/2022 10:03

There's a video on twitter showing an anaesthetist orally raping a woman in the middle of her fucking c-section.

But women are wrong to be wary of men whilst in hospital 🙄

...... I have no words.

You know that quote about 'why aren't women so angry they're burning the whole world down right now?'

Remind me again, why aren't we?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/10/2022 10:51

There is a specific example in the text of the Equality Act that explains the provision of services to women victims of sexual assault can exclude 'transwomen'.

Yes, including those with a GRC.

Datun · 23/10/2022 13:56

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/10/2022 10:51

There is a specific example in the text of the Equality Act that explains the provision of services to women victims of sexual assault can exclude 'transwomen'.

Yes, including those with a GRC.

Yes. It was completely understood, ^obviously%, that there are certain circumstances, where men should not be.

And it's the likes of lobby groups like Stonewall, who have convinced people otherwise.

Just one speech from someone in government authority saying, of course, women should have their own wards, toilets, prisons. And no, that doesn't include transwomen. Get a grip. Otherwise face prosecution for indirect sex discrimination. If even one woman self excludes on the basis that you are including males, that is indirect discrimination.