[quote vivariumvivariumsvivaria]@Calyx72 are you able to share what the post was about? Was it about the Stonewall podcast, or the open letter to the RCM or similar?
I don't want to get anyone into trouble - but I'm interested in the themes. Very sorry I missed the thread![/quote]
Hiya, I am annoyed at myself that I didn't copy it somewhere as I should have known it would be whisked away.
The original poster (anonymous) asked whether we should be concerned that the CSP are paying and taking advice from Stonewall given that SW have been shown to misrepresent laws (or something like that).
Someone asked why they would be concerned,
Original poster replied with a really well written post, nothing that could be construed as transphobic but putting forward the points that Stonewall may have previously been for LGB but now appear to be pushing T ideology (I am possibly misremembering) and mentioned LGB Alliance in there, also Kathleen Stock and Maya Forstater and women's rights.
Someone replied (not anonymous but with a username) who was obviously a TRA with a long (very long) message just being patronising about the post, all the usual stuff and saying LGB Alliance are a hate group, Kathleen Stock and Maya Forstater are transphobes
I answered (anonymously) saying oh here we go, all the usual dismissiveness and saying LGBA are a hate group when they are obviously not. Mentioned women's rights and gender critical views being legally protected as per recent cases. TRA replied again saying GCs are transphobes and saying "concerns" brought up are obviously just transphobic views.
There had been a few more anonymous comments in the GC view and only the one TRA but then it was gone.
So basically a whole thread of various voices and one TRA; pulled and no comeback except to basically reframe our thinking.