Special trans taxi services to keep them safe

[BuzzShitbagBobbly]

Hey BBC, where's our front-page promoted article and video interview about all the things women have done for and by each other, for centuries, to stay safe in public? No?

The "look at poor ickle us suffering from these things nobody has ever had to worry about before" is so infuriating. We have been living this shit forever.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-49516092/the-taxi-service-trying-to-keep-trans-people-safe

So by that logic, presumably you're happy with me saying that you're at greater risk of being in a car accident than being raped by a taxi driver, so why are you bothered about the chances of being raped?

You can say what you like kark.

🤣

And, I for one, fully encourage you.

And two percent will be a woman, so why are you happy to be alone with a woman?

Nope, just if you're going to dig and insinuate at posters you can't really be surprised when it turns out they mis-read what you (supposedly) meant - just come straight out and say what you actually mean instead of insinuating stuff.

🤣

And I personally find it difficult to accept the concept that I'm magically safe from harm if I'm alone with a woman.

No one here has said that. Women do pose a small risk to other women. Dwarfed by the risk the male sex class do. Magic won't help you with a predatory male, either.

Strawperson x I've lost count, but it is basically the same few over and over and over again

And two percent will be a woman, so why are you happy to be alone with a woman?

What women? You're going to have to be more specific. My mum?

98% of the time they'll be male. Stop pretending that's not the case.

Yes, statistically more likely to be male, yes.
So with that being the case, you can either go around segregating yourself, feeling vulnerable, and scared of every man, or you can apply rationality.
I'm going for the latter.

Whether I’m at more or less risk from other things is completely irrelevant.
Risk assessments are not done on the basis of the chances of being bitten by a shark versus whether that bridge can hold 40 cars.

One woman gets in a taxi.
Assess risk based on sex of driver.

It’s not hard.

Don't evade the question. Why are you happy to be alone with a female stranger when there's a two percent chance that she will sexually assault you?

Round and round we go on "Understanding Risk for Dummies". Some people don't seem to have got past the blurb on the back cover yet.

Oh look, it's doing it's rolling emojis, had a bet on with myself, I won
So predictable it's actually funny.

Um, recognising that men commit 98% of all sex crime, and 20% of women will suffer from it, is applying rationality.

Perhaps you meant a different word?

Oh yeah, I forgot you don't like the emojis, roses.

No, I didn't. I don't expect you to get what I actually said going on past experience so not much point even trying lol

You're just as predictable Roses because I had a bet with myself you'd make a comment on Datun's emoji, as you have done before.

Kark your view then is that sex segregation is not important at all when it comes to women's safety? In certain circs.

You know the answer. Because you feel the risk is so negligible that it's not worth rearranging your life so that you're never alone with a female stranger.

And that's precisely the same reason that I, and many, many, many others are quite happy to be alone with a transwoman. Because the chances of them being a rapist are negligible.

X post with Datun 🤣

Which is lower
2% or 98%?

It’s a hard one.

I’m going with 2%.

I have to get a taxi.
Do I choose
98% risk or 2% risk.

I think I’ll go with 2%.

Well yeah, seeing as I've said on the thread I don't put up with the snide attacks on here, was pretty predictable that I'd bring it up lol, don't exactly need a crystal ball

Because the chances of them being a rapist are negligible.

Actually the changes of them being aggressive is statistically the same as other men.

Way more than 20% of women experience sex crime, I'd put it at 100% over a lifetime and most multiple occasions.

Were you just referring to rape?

And that's precisely the same reason that I, and many, many, many others are quite happy to be alone with a transwoman. Because the chances of them being a rapist are negligible.

They are just as likely to be a rapist as any other male person. And no that specific risk isn't "negligible"

So you can just not get in a taxi with them then, can't you?

Why are your emojis and lolz acceptable and Datun's aren't?

Id like 98% if its a lottery win

And 2% if its victim of a crime

Please and thank you