Horrible article.
'Which some women might view as a male genitalia' .... because that is what it is, and all women will see it as such, not just some.
Then going on to liken the discomfort of having a penis in a changing room with the discomfort of viewing an elderly women, or disabled woman. My God.
Also, claiming that a trans penis isn't loaded with dangers like a regular male one is nonsense. It's akin that my knife is not a threat but someone else's is. How is a woman supposed to know which is safe? And even if it were safe, why does she have to be exposed to one, or have to subject herself to the gaze of a penis owner?
What an awful lot of trans are forgetting is that the penis owner might not be trans as all. As far as I am aware, and it ought to be patently obvious to trans too, is that there is no objection to trans, it's an objection to penis owners, because penis owners as a group pose a threat. That is me, my son, my male friends... We are not up in arms feeling hard done to. Our sex is aggressive and threatening.
Sure, actual trans (not some faux trans trying to gain access) are in a curious position. They too face the threat of male violence, but their answer is to compromise the safety and comfort of women (who find precious little as it is)?
No, they need to secure their own 3rd space.
And this Cis-women crap. They are women, literally born and bred. Not content to take up their spaces, do they have to take their sex too?